User talk:Mr Stephen/Archive 3

I know Charlie Villanueva very well. I am 100% percent sure of my facts and I was correcting the encyclopedia. DO NOT CHANGE MY STUFF AGAIN —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.33.22.102 (talk • contribs) .

Thanks

Thank you for fixing the vandalism on my user page. --Czj 00:40, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Deletion

sorry prove a point? there is no notability to these articles, and i can see no possible argument to the contray, if an admin disagrees then can feel free to change it to an Afd tag, i'm doing wiki a service by recommending for deletion articles that are jus taking up space, most of which are likely done as school ICT projects. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.26.106.254 (talk • contribs) .

No admin required - any editor can remove the tags - so if YOU want the articles removed, it's upto YOU to AFD them. --Charlesknight 23:34, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

In the past similar schools were put up for Afd and Keep was the outcome because there is not a consensus to delete. The Afd were sometimes heated discussions leaving some users with bad feeling. I see no reason to repeat these Afd on schools when the outcome is likely to be the same. For this reason I request that you please stop nominating them for deletion. --FloNight 02:50, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Hi Mr. Stephen :-) Sorry if my comment here was confusing. I did hijack your user talk to leave a comment related to deletion of school articles. Thanks for letting me borrow it to quickly communicate my thoughts. I'll follow up better in more appropriate places later today. Take care, FloNight 14:49, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Dear Mr. Stephen, I was correct. Oswald Avery really did invent the Chunnel Tube, and was deeply involved in anal intercourse. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 207.165.142.138 (talk • contribs).

anti vandalism

Not sure how to award a barnstar, but thanks anyway for your good work in pursuing 82.26.106.254 who seems to want to eliminate every school-related article on Wiki! What did his teachers do to him I wonder? I think this is not the first time it has happened. If he wants to debate, he should get a username and make himself contactable. School details can be of general use, in fact I have just had to do a number of biographical corrections for a leading political figure because of a misunderstanding due to the lack of web-accessible school history. Hyperman 42 03:28, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

Oswald Avery vandals

No problem. I've got the Oswald Avery page on my watchlist, and am keeping an eye on the three IPs so far. Some sort of tag-team vandalism going on. My guess would be a group of kids in a school computer hall. Whoever they are, they are fast working their way through all the warnings, and the block-bat will come out if they keep going after the Final Warnings. :) - TexasAndroid 20:35, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

i apologize

many aticles contained misinformation or slander so i removed them. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 208.108.100.145 (talk • contribs).

Dates

Certainly for a very long time. It is of course only a guideline. Rich Farmbrough, 15:06 5 December 2006 (GMT).

nigeria

sorry about the nigeria part, my computer has a local area network within more computers in my office and some friends tried to add my sources in the nigeria website because is this how they used to call me. but now its ok since their computer got blocked for vandalism on wikipedia —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Brasileiro1 (talk • contribs) 18:58, 6 December 2006 (UTC).

Keith Sager....

KS was key to passing A Level English- i guess the guy actually does exist, but we attributed all our unknown sources, comments etc to him. His history is a bit of a guess but i mean he's gotta be left on just for comedy value.... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Cammers7 (talk • contribs) 03:13, 7 December 2006 (UTC).

Hey Mr Stephen,

I'd just like to say you're one super cool admin and keep up the good work!

JosaoJosao 09:33, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

Post reply

Thanks for the advice...I'm not 100% certain what all that means, but I'll study up on that and consider using it in the future.EOBeav 23:44, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

Jeffrey Abbott

I posted this on the talk page, (The content of the page is historically accurate and in accordance with wikipedia,the information is verifiable Please note that their is no attempt to link to website for sales or advertising. Can it be expanded? Yes of course and i will be happy to meet any criteria that is needed.)

In the time i scribed my objection THOUGH i requested a "Hold On" the article was deleted.

If this does not meet criteria. Please advice at length on what does. If you wish to assist me in getting this correct PLEASE would be greatly appreciated Thanks

Kne01 20:25, 11 December 2006 (UTC) kne01

Your edit to Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism

Your recent edit to Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 14:23, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

No, I was right. VP had got the username wrong & I was correcting it. Ho hum. Mr Stephen 14:28, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Username report

You posted User:Darkherox on WP:AIV for a username violation. Please explain why this is a violation. (I've removed it from the AIV notice board.) — ERcheck (talk) 14:32, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

sorry

i didnt realise i was doing somthing wronng by messing with darkherox page because i know him in real life and i was just teasing him if i knew it was aganst the rules i wouldent have done it sorry :-} Sailor cuteness 19:11, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Sorry i apologize for that. Wendy Alane Wright credits and facts can be VERIFIED at the following websites:

http://www.discogs.com/artist/Wendy+Wright

http://www.popinstituut.nl/biografie/def_la_desh___the_fresh_witness.13954.html

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2397715/ —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Wendyalane (talk • contribs).

I meet 2 of these categories:

1. Has had a charted hit on any national music chart. YES I HAVE.

1. Has been placed in rotation nationally by any major radio network. FEEL THE RHYTHM WAS IN ROTATION NATIONALLY.

ALSO, I HAVE REACHED A LEVEL OF NOTABILITY IN THE DUTCH MUSIC ENCYCLOPEDIA. MY EXISTENCE BY THIS OUTSIDE SOURCE CAN BE VERIFIED:

ALSO THE RECORD I WROTE AND SANG ON "FEEL GOOD" WENT GOLD IN SCANDINAVIA AND HOLLAND.

http://www.popinstituut.nl/biografie/def_la_desh___the_fresh_witness.13954.html

wendy Wendyalane 20:59, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Problems

Hello, Mr. Stephen, We have recently learned that you have changed our edit on the Atlantis page. We hope that this is a joke. If it is not, we will be forced to...silence you, by very unpleasant means. Please, for your own sake, cease these shennanagins. Have a merry Christmas.

Your Friend —The preceding unsigned comment was added by DickLukens (talk • contribs) 14:44, 20 December 2006 (UTC).

Guitar Hero III

An article that you have been involved in editing, Guitar Hero III, has been listed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guitar Hero III. Please look there to see why this is, if you are interested in whether it should be deleted. Thank you. --Lankybugger 19:38, 26 December 2006 (UTC) Lankybugger 19:38, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

Untagged image

An image you uploaded, Image:Sydney Grammar School Logo.png, was tagged with the {{coatofarms}} copyright tag. This tag was deleted because it does not actually specify the copyright status of the image. The image may need a more accurate copyright tag, or it may need to be deleted. If the image portrays a seal or emblem, it should be tagged as {{seal}}. If you have any questions, ask them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. -- 13:47, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Not my upload, I simply reverted some vandalism. User:Mdmanser has fixed the problem. Mr Stephen 14:57, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Your Message

Pardon me, but I am not the one who is undoing someone else's edits repeatedly - "Kolindigo" is! (Or are YOU Kolindigo?) This person has repeatedly deleted the link to the Johnny Weir Fans group because he (or she?) feels that it competes with the Johnny fan club that he belongs to (Rising Star). He has even gone so far as to lie on the discussion page and say the Johnny Weir Fans group is dead and that is why he is deleting it. It is an active club. I keep putting it back up because he keeps deleting it, so clearly Kolindigo is the one engaging in an editing war.

The same goes for the information about the major controversy about Johnny Weir's omission from USFSA's promotional material for 2007 National Championships this year. It was picked up by the media and discussed extensively on figures skating sites, and skating fans bombarded USFSA with letters of protest that resulted in his being added to the website. Clearly, the controversy deserves a mention. It is fact that it happened. Kolindigo is engaging in an editing war by deleting any mention of it over and over again every time it is put up. So why is Kolindigo not stripped of all Wikipedia duties and banned from the site for such poor behavior? Again, unless you are Kolindigo I can see no reason why you are defending this behavior. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.16.74.58 (talk • contribs).

hahaha this thing is so stupid what if i just kept messing with all the articles. I wont do it again but what if someone where to continuosly do this. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.224.35.64 (talk • contribs).

Rebecca Davison

Hi, i'm trying to write an article on Cristiano Ronaldo's current girlfriend. You say it should be deleted however there are links to Cristiano's past girlfriends, i.e Jordana Jardel and all she is known for is being the sister of a footballer / Cristiano's alleged ex. I know that Rebecca Davison is shooting her first film and has a novel to be released alongside her already pubslished poetry, so surely if an article on Jordana Jarden is eligable then she should be, if not more. Also, it is also been said that Cristiano is now engaged to Rebecca.

Thanks

Mia —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mia33 (talk • contribs).

Thank you for replying however, I am therefore confused as to why this page - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jordana_Jardel is still up. At least Rebecca Davison is making films and about to have a novel published.

Thanks Mia —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mia33 (talk • contribs).

Regarding deletion of the Rebecca Davison article. Now people are mentioning her on ronaldoattack.com —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mia33 (talk • contribs).

I agree with you completely about not posting something relaible and understand wikipedia's policy. I didn't post it with a bad intention, it's something I know to be one hundred percent fact, just because google can't verify something doesn't mean it isn't correct. And more, a girl on that forum is discussing seeing them together and now there are other forums with more people saying the same. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mia33 (talk • contribs).

Re: your pissy little message

I don't care. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Wikipaedo (talk • contribs) 00:58, 9 January 2007 (UTC).

http://www.indopos.co.id/index.php?act=detail_c&id=265799

may I add her to Cristiano's wikipedia page now, at least? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mia33 (talk • contribs).

Stockport

Hi, thank for the message. The problem with your revision is that the constituencies are talking about the Metropolitan Borough of Stockport as opposed to just Stockport - thus that kind of information is more suitable for the borough page (see Metropolitan Borough of Rochdale and/or Metropolitan Borough of Oldham for example), and avoids confusion between the two entities.

You mention consistency - that's what I was intending to achieve - though I perhaps should've trasferred the info to the borough article. Jhamez84 13:52, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

Please dont tell me im adding nonsense to random articles that i have never been on again, i am not vandalising because i have never even seen the article. You should check these things before sending wrong messages

Anon, you received that message because you share an IP address with the individual who did vandalise the article in question. When you did, you also received a message explaining that by creating an account and logging in, you can avoid receiving further messages not intended for you. Flakeloaf 10:34, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

Mr Stephen appears to be an idiot

Please dont tell me im adding nonsense to random articles that i have never been on again, i am not vandalising because i have never even seen the article. You should check these things before sending wrong messages —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.65.53.148 (talk) 10:35, 14 January 2007 (UTC).

User talk:70.132.145.116

I opened up a page that gave me the message referenced above (the User Talk). I have never changed an article and I am curious if someone maybe doing it under my name. can you please respond. Thank you.

andrealers@sbcglobal.net

i don't get why my article is being deleted there's nothing bad on it —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Chriscool334 (talk • contribs).

ya but it tries to get the band more popularity. and i think thats its nice to do that not to just leave the band in the dust —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Chriscool334 (talk • contribs).

well its for people who want to no more about the band... and it gives good info on how they met. it makes a kind of perfect wikipedia page.

I DONT WANT IT DELETED!!! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Chriscool334 (talk • contribs).

why did you delete this page about Archers New Rival i have just created it today and planned to make updates on it there was no reason why you should've deleted it. I just wanted the band to be known —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Chriscool334 (talk • contribs).

i have read the terms and everything else but still i have no clue why it should have been deleted. it explained how they met and how it was formed and if you look in the encyclopedia it would say stuff like that.

STOP IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

why did you delete it again. it certainly shows importance of the band i have created it today and planned to make updates and revise everything. furthermore i'm right and clearly your wrong. i was not advertising and anyways showing importance is advertising, get it through your head. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Chriscool334 (talk • contribs) 01:04, 29 January 2007 (UTC).

archers new rival

ok now i know —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Chriscool334 (talk • contribs) 23:16, 29 January 2007 (UTC).

LISTEN

I'm getting sick and tired of you do you want me to delete it because your really annoying me —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Chriscool334 (talk • contribs). @ about 23:43 29 January 2007

PNCL TREE

What is this?

I do as i am told, and my pages are deleted before I can return to Wikipedia and change them? What do you have against a company whose mission is he naming pencils, and placing them on Wikipedia?

If you have any suggestions on how I could be able to change the page to meet Wiki standards, I'd love to know.

Help is most appreciated.

P.S. I plan, within the next year i plan to add over a thousand pages, but I just need to know how I can keep them on the site. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by King Semsem (talk • contribs) 04:03, 30 January 2007 (UTC).

wah u gon do i can fukin hack ur server and block u —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 216.99.56.37 (talk • contribs).

The entry for "Coat of Eyes", is in my own words. How can this been restored? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Eaccess07 (talk • contribs).

Why is my article being deleted? I worked at BET and have received credits on the shows that I've worked on. Please feel free to google my name to confirm.Funmikuye 18:45, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Coat of Eyes

Thanks for your message. Please sign your posts to talk pages with four tildes, ie Eaccess07 22:30, 2 February 2007 (UTC). Just to be clear; are you saying that you wrote the text at http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=81530128, you own the copyright in it, and you are willing to realease it under the GNU Free Documentation License?

That's absolutely correct. Thank you Mr. Stephen.

Eaccess07 22:30, 2 February 2007 (UTC)Greg

Swiss Artists

My mistake, I had the text file saved and could have sworn it was on my list of things to do. I even contributed to the AfD! I should know better! --Steve _(Slf67) ^talk 11:47, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Filmogs

		The Original Barnstar
		I saw your work on all those upside-down filmogs - good stuff! Messing with those wikitables is not easy... 82.2.139.211 23:02, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Taking down my Santonio Holmes section

Whether you believe it or not, there actually is a religion that worships Santonio Holmes. There are tons of practicers of the religion on GameFAQs' Madden NFL 07 Message Boards. This is not vandalism, Santonio Holmesism is real.

Thank you. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by TheRabbitMan (talk • contribs) 00:18, 14 February 2007 (UTC).

VP

Please see my response at User talk:AmiDaniel/VP/Discuss Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 01:34, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Archive-y Stuff

I am not sure what you did, buddy.Can you explain a bit clearer?Arcayne 23:44, 16 February 2007 (UTC) It sure is okay. Thanks for the assist. How did you happen to spot it in the first place?Arcayne 23:55, 16 February 2007 (UTC) I have noticed that one of my archives might have had its name changed, as the archive named Interlude Textboxes is now empty, while no edit clearly shows it being removed. I am kinda new at this, and might be missing sth.Arcayne 15:27, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

I appreciate your candor, however everytime Jazz and Jess has been added to wikipedia the reasoning is that it does not fit the criteria of a web comic, however how can it not be a web comic? It is a "comic that is available on the Internet. Exclusively published online for either commercial or artistic reasons." This of course is a para-phrase of the definition of a webcomic on this very website. If it is due to lack of detail then that is purely due to the fact that I am a busy man and cannot make a full blown page in the spare minutes I have during a day.

I apologise if this message comes off as being rude, that is not my intention and I hope this message finds you happy and well. Please reply to me as soon as possible so that we can rectify this situation.

Many thanks —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dante424325 (talk • contribs).

Jazz and Jess (webcomic)

Thanks for getting back to me in regard to the Jazz and Jess Wikipedia page.

I have requested on the article for deletion that this page be given more time, this is as we understand the lack of notoriety this page currently has but this wikipedia page is being used so as to a) boost awareness of the page (as it is listed on the on the list of webcomics now) and b) as a reference that we are using when trying to convince sites to advertise the comic.

I will be completely honest with you, I am the writer of the comic, I do not do this for financial gain but purely so I am doing something with writing, an art I love. The comic isn't noticed purely because we do not have th money in which to sell it on other more famous webomic sites and therefore resort to having to visit forums and websites such as "digg it" to namedrop the comic too. This Wikipedia page is part and partial to letting people know what the comic is and where to read it. As it stands we have little other resource until word gets around of the comic. The notoriety will grow purely because there is a wikipedia page for the site, because it is amongst the list of webcomics and then it won't be an issue anymore.

I hope you take this into consideration.

Also I have noticed the new deletion notice state that the page be improved in the process, can you please leand me suggestions on how you think this should be done as I currently have little time to edit the page and neither does the artist.

Thank you for your time and consideration, I hope this message reaches you happy and well.

Kind Regards

Duke Palmer

Thank you

Thanks for alerting me to that vandalism on my userpage. Here's a barnstar. :-) 1ne 23:42, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Bridgetfox318 18:35, 20 February 2007 (UTC)== What??? ==

An unfootnoted random statement about Wilson eating really big sausages as his specialty under the heading "Law Practice" is obviously some sort of vandalism. I have read through the Introduction and Guidelines for editing and can't find your justification for including this. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bridgetfox318 (talk • contribs) 18:30, 20 February 2007 (UTC).

Schools articles deletion

This has surfaced again in a new context. If you're interested, there is a discussion on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/City of Portsmouth Boys' School. Your input could be helpful. Hyperman 42 02:53, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

American Association for Laboratory Animal Science

Hello, you tagged American Association for Laboratory Animal Science for copyright reason. But someone created it again and posted something on the talk page. I dont know what to reply, can you help me? thanks -Sucrine ( ><> talk) 17:56, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Greater Manchester map

Hi! Thanks for the contact and feedback. Quite right, I had included the Eccles to Manchester stretch - it was just transparent! I've since fixed this. I also seem to have worked from an erroneous map myself, as bizzarely, it shows an extra stretch of motorway at the M60/67 junction. I'll change this right away. Jhamez84 21:26, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

none

how can I post picture on the article page ? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Huylam92 (talk • contribs).

Is there anything left to clean up about the mistaken identity? I made no contributions to Napoleon or fantasy football, nor do I recognize the IP address 147.35.248.6. I frankly never actually know what IP addresses the cable company assigns to me, but I assume the address changes dynamically. Can someone simply hijack my name and make all kinds of silly contributions with it? I thought the password would protect that.

My posts have been on mundane things like window screens and muntins. Useful but obscure, but certainly not trash. Check them out.1 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Barrister noir (talk • contribs).

HI

I AM AN AUTOMATED BOT. SORRY FOR THE INCONVIENIENCE. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 199.176.226.33 (talk • contribs).

VandalProof

I tried using VP a few months ago and couldn't get the moderator features to work. I'm not sure if it has been fixed or not. You'd probably have better luck contacting User:AmiDaniel directly as I think he is currently fairly active on WP. Sorry I couldn't be more helpful. --PS2pcGAMER (talk) 23:49, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

Great work

Great work on the Reddish article!!! It's looking truly fantastic. It needs some standardisation to the headings and to satisfy some of the finer cosmetic requirements of WP:MOS and UK geography WikiProject, and then I think it could be recommended for becoming an official good article. The referencing is amazing. Jhamez84 23:43, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

No problem! Thanks for the quick contact! It's mainly minor things I can see, such as unit conversions, Wikilinking, lead standardisation, a tiny amount of gramatical redundancy etc. If you have no objections, I'll take a stab at "recitifying" these issues; they would be cosmetic only, and not compromising the text in any way.

Shaw and Crompton was my pet project which is now GA. I'm keen to see more Greater Manchester articles reaching this standard. Jhamez84 01:14, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

I've made a few changes to the article, though it needs a little more to the wording and paragraphing. Some of it I found difficult to follow.

My main concern is the lead section. I don't have local knowledge, but I think it could do with being re-written, acting more as a standalone summary of the wider article (WP:LEAD). I could post a note on the Greater Manchester WikiProject to obtain some interest? Jhamez84 23:31, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Capitalization

You are misspelling the word. Idiot.

You fucking wikipedia morons! You've decided to set aside the basic rules for capitalization that are taught in the 3rd Grade, and create your own. No wonder well educated people refuse to take wikipedia seriously. 14thArmored 02:31, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Sophie lockrey

Good evening (GMT time); my apologies. I just over-wrote your edit at the above page without realising - I simply noticed the vandalism was still present, and blanked the page before adding {{db-vandalism}}. This was accidental, and I hope you bear no ill feelings!

Don't hesitate to drop me a message at my talk page if you've got any more questions.

Kindest regards,
anthonycfc ^[talk] 23:58, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

I apoligise my "friend" Vinnie wrote that message from my computer so i hope it did no harm. Thank you —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.224.204.137 (talk • contribs).

Yeah I know.

...I do know how to use wikipedia but thanks for reminding me... XP I apologize for being rude to Oliver Cromwell too... heh heh —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 86.11.104.226 (talk • contribs).

Stuart School of Business

Nice catch, and thanks for cleaning that up. I was mostly just trying to keep the main Illinois Institute of Technology article clean, and didn't really go through all that text (except to remove some obviously unimportant or non-encyclopedic stuff, and fix some wiki-formatting).

Thanks! --Duncanr 15:31, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Greater Manchester map settings

Excellent work! I used trial and error to get reasonable results, but these are exacting. Thank you very much. Hopefully this will halt some of the problems seen on article about the northwest of the county.

On another note, any luck with the Reddish article since? I posted it on the GM WikiProject to generate interest, but it seems nobody has touched it, which is a shame. Jhamez84 15:21, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

If you would be kind enough to take a look at Template:Location map West Midlands and improve upon my settings, I, as well as a huge part of the West Midlands, would be eternally grateful! Jhamez84 22:53, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

apologies for recent change to 'bum' atmosphere, i believe my fool of a brother or possibly someone else entirely used my i.p to edit the section.

spamming

I sincerely apologize,

I was not aware that it was against your policies and I assure you that it willn ot happen again.

Best wishes,

Martin —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 58.8.45.43 (talk) 11:28, 1 April 2007 (UTC).

Manchester and Greater Manchester maps

You recently posted a message on my talk page about a "Manchester" map. I haven't altered or edited any "Manchester" map. I think you've got confused with "Manchester" (the city) and "Greater Manchester" (the county).
I did alter the Image:Greater Manchester outline map with UK.png map which was created by User:Jhamez84 to show Horwich's true position in the "county" - Image:Horwich in Greater Manchester.png. It doesn't matter now. The Coordinates and the red pin are now correct. So that can be forgotten.
I do though find it annoying that Greater Manchester is being treated as an extention of Manchester, and that some are dropping the "Greater" bit of the county's name. It would be like discussing a map of Stafford when they really mean Staffordshire.
I hope you'll remember the difference between county and city. Cwb61 (talk) 22:12, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

RE: Rob Van Dam

Yea, I didn't revert back enough edits. The paragraph that user put in (albeit in good faith) is considered week by week and not notable in accordance with WP:PW, so I was trying to revert that, not the spelling correction. Bmg916^Speak_Sign 17:52, 3 April 2007 (UTC)