User talk:Morphinedarwa

License tagging for File:Tarielashvilicrest.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Tarielashvilicrest.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:05, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Need for sources, edit-warring, and multiple accounts

Wikipedia depends on information being verifiable. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, people can and do come here and post information in articles which is simply wrong, sometimes maliciously, and sometimes in good faith but mistakenly. The only way we can protect Wikipedia against such false claims is by requiring that information be verifiable by means of reliable published sources. We cannot accept information on the basis of the unsubstantiated word of just anyone who creates a Wikipedia account, and says "you don't need reliable published sources for this, because I am telling you it's true".
Even if content is true, we need evidence that it is significant and notable. It is true that there are tulip flowers in my garden, but it would be wholly inappropriate to include that in the Wikipedia article about the town where I live. The way we ensure that information is significant enough for inclusion is requiring significant coverage in reliable sources, so that is a second reason for rejecting information without a reliable source.
When editors disagree about the contents of an article, they should discuss the issues, with a view to trying to reach agreement. It is not a satisfactory method of resolving disputes for editors to keep reverting to their preferred version, so that eventually the most stubborn editor gets his or her way. Repeatedly reverting like that, called edit-warring, is disruptive, and editors who continue to edit-war may be blocked from editing to stop the disruption.
It is clear that your recent editing at Tarielashvili has been closely connected to editing from another account and an IP address. Also, an account which edited in October and November of last year referred to the article, which you created, as "my article". Are you the same person who used the other accounts and edited without using an account? If not, what is your connection to the other person or persons involved? The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 17:11, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ownership of Wikipedia content

You do not own the article Tarielashvili. When you post any content to any Wikipedia page, you are giving it to Wikipedia. If you wish to retain control over what you write, then don't post it to Wikipedia. If you continue to edit disruptively you may be blocked from editing. I also note that you have not answered my questions above. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 21:35, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

First of all i have nothing relative with others and second i have edited things on this page too and thats why im answered to him and 3 yes i wanted to delete this article because im tired of this shit and baby games :) Sincerely Morphine. --Morphinedarwa (talk) 22:00, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you all need more evidence and this why you all have deleted things of this article, than why only of this article? there is 5 other surnames who has only evidence a oral tradition why you all dont delete them too? or there is only lack of evidence on this article?.. thats funny bye. --Morphinedarwa (talk) 22:06, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bek (given name)

The article Bek (given name) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not a name disambiguation, not a notable subject.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 13:07, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]