User talk:Mojarra69

Welcome

Hello, Mojarra69, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 18:10, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

This is Mojarra69's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Search For Synergy (March 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by CommanderWaterford were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Search For Synergy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Search For Synergy, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CommanderWaterford (talk) 14:00, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mojarra69! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CommanderWaterford (talk) 14:00, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Search For Synergy (March 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Padavalamkuttanpilla was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Search For Synergy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Search For Synergy, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Padavalam🌂 ► 15:15, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Search For Synergy (March 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

See WP:NBOOKS

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Search For Synergy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Search For Synergy, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 18:10, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Mojarra69! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Page Creation, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Search For Synergy (April 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nathan2055 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please take a look at the book notability criteria and add additional reliable and independent sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Search For Synergy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Search For Synergy, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 20:18, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Search For Synergy (May 13)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by ReaderofthePack was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: This doesn't pass notability guidelines at this point in time. To establish notability you need coverage in places that are independent of the author, publisher, and anyone affiliated with them, but they must also be a source that Wikipedia would consider reliable.

For example, while reviews can count towards notability, only a certain type of review is usable. Reviews on Amazon or social media type sites like Goodreads are not usable to establish this and by large are not considered to be relevant to Wikipedia unless it's covered heavily in the press. For an example of how social media and merchant reviews would be something that would be covered in an article, see the articles on Saving Christmas and Bend, Not Break.

Reviews on self-published sources like blogs are almost always going to be unusable, as most don't undergo the type of editorial oversight Wikipedia requires or are written by someone who would be considered a reliable source in and of themselves. To that end the one by Robichaud would likely not be considered a RS on Wikipedia since I can't see where the blog or Robichaud have been routinely covered in independent, reliable sources (particularly academic and scholarly sources) to be considered reliable.

You also want to avoid wikis as sources. These are user created and are not going to be seen as a reliable source. Even Wikipedia pretty much can't be used to source itself.

As far as other sources go, avoid using social media or merchant sources as sources. They're considered to be weak sources as a whole and in some cases can come across as promotional. With books it's best to cite the books themselves, rather than a merchant source, particularly as merchant/commerce sites tend to change often.

ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 19:35, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Draft:The Search For Synergy. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Wikipedia is not a venue for promoting your books Theroadislong (talk) 18:08, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:The Search For Synergy has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:The Search For Synergy. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 18:15, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 16:11, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:The Search For Synergy

Hello, Mojarra69. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Search For Synergy, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:01, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Mojarra69! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Adding my Book Series to Wikipedia, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:05, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The Search For Synergy

Hello, Mojarra69. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Search For Synergy".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:15, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Liz. Can you please tell me what I need to get a Wiki page going? If you Google my name, you will see that I have everything I need to have a Wiki page created. Please tell me what I am missing?

https://www.google.com/search?q=brett+salter&rlz=1C1VDKB_enUS1054US1054&oq=brett+salter&aqs=chrome..69i57j46i512j0i512l5j46i175i199i512j0i512l2.1943j0j15&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

Thank you for your time Mojarra69 (talk) 15:23, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]