User talk:Mohan Bose

August 2014

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you recently removed some content from North Bengal with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 07:09, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Institute of Pharmacy, Jalpaiguri may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

The '''Institute of Pharmacy, Jalpaiguri''', is situated in the [[India]]n city of [[Jalpaiguri in the district of [[Jalpaiguri]] in [[West Bengal]], [[India]]. It is situated in the

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:22, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve North Bengal, Bangladesh

Hi, I'm 220 of Borg. Mohan Bose, thanks for creating North Bengal, Bangladesh!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add some reliable sources to this page Or it may be deleted.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. 220 of ^Borg 07:36, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

On second look you appear to be deleting content from North Bengal and pasting it into North Bengal, Bangladesh. Creating a new page or changing the name by cut and paste is not permitted.--220 of ^Borg 08:09, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Mohan Bose, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as North Bengal, Bangladesh, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! 220 of ^Borg 07:39, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Content deletion

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to North Bengal, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. 220 of ^Borg 07:59, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summary

Hi there. When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field – please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you. --220 of ^Borg 08:02, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Overlinking

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In your recent edit to Jalpaiguri, you added links to an article which did not add content or meaning, or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking. Thank you. 220 of ^Borg 08:26, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Article 'ownership'

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. However, please remember that editors do not own articles and should respect the work of their fellow contributors on Jalpaiguri. If you create or edit an article, remember that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Removal of valid maintenance templates, while re-adding un-sourced unencyclopedic content without any explanation, could be classed as disruptive editing, or even vandalism. 220 of ^Borg 07:51, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at North Bengal, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 08:04, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Let's talk

As we seem to be at odds, how about we have a discussion about why you have removed maintenance templates, and re-added un-sourced and possibly promotional edits to the Jalpaiguri page.

Remember Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, and lists of shops in a town aren't very encyclopedic.--220 of ^Borg 08:03, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that you don't want to talk as you are continuing to add promotional material to the page. here. Interesting that Mohan Bose is supposedly the name of the towns Mayor. If true, if you are 'Mohan Bose' you have a Conflict of interest and should not be editing this page in a promotional manner, if at all.--220 of ^Borg 08:23, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Jalpaiguri. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. 220 of ^Borg 08:26, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Jalpaiguri, you may be blocked from editing.
You do realise that the manner of your editing here and refusal to communicate does nothing but show Jalpaiguri in a 'bad light'? 220 of ^Borg 08:50, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Jalpaiguri. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. 220 of ^Borg 09:32, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing

Mohan, User:220 of Borg has been trying to help you by giving you advice on how to edit in Wikipedia, and pointing you toward resources so you can learn how to be a better contributor. I strongly encourage you to heed that advice. Wikipedia is a community of volunteers. Like any community, it has rules to help people get along better. When you ignore those rules, your behaviour is disruptive to the community, and your edits will be reverted. This is a waste of your time and other people's time. If you continue to do this, you will be blocked from editing. Ground Zero | t 11:00, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dhupguri subdivision

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Dhupguri subdivision, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Shyamsunder (talk) 17:05, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Removing maintenance template-Unsourced

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove the maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Institute of Pharmacy, Jalpaiguri.

My edit summary explains why I reverted. Yours doesn't, and is against WP policy. 220 of ^Borg 13:01, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Introducing Unsourced, Promotional content

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Jalpaiguri, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
Once again removing maintenance templates, replacing sourced encyclopedic information such as population numbers with figures that have no source, and adding unsourced, promotional content. 220 of ^Borg 13:17, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Warring, again

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Jalpaiguri. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. 220 of ^Borg 18:45, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked. You have received many warnings that you will be blocked from editing if you continue to edit war, and you went ahead and continued your edits without discussing them on the articles' talk pages. So, as promised, you are blocked from editing. If you use other accounts to continue to ignore Wikipedia's rules, I will block those too. If you continue this behaviour without signing in to Wikipedia, I will protect the articles from editing by unregistered users. You are wasting your time and the time of other editors in attempting to impose your version of these articles on Wikipedia. Wikipedia is a collaborative effort, and you cannot get your own way. you have to work with others to make changes here. Is that clear? Ground Zero | t 20:45, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Nomination for deletion of Template:Railways in Jalpaiguri

Template:Railways in Jalpaiguri has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:19, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dhupguri subdivision

Hello, Mohan Bose,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Hughesdarren and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Dhupguri subdivision, for deletion, because a consensus decision previously decided that it wasn't suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. If you wish to restore a page deleted via a deletion discussion, please use the deletion review process instead, rather than reposting the content of the page.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Hughesdarren (talk) 08:55, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dhupguri subdivision

Hello, Mohan Bose,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username FuzzyMagma and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Dhupguri subdivision, for deletion, because a consensus decision previously decided that it wasn't suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. If you wish to restore a page deleted via a deletion discussion, please use the deletion review process instead, rather than reposting the content of the page.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|FuzzyMagma}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

FuzzyMagma (talk) 19:29, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]