User talk:Miwiki12

March 2024

Hello, I'm JalenFolf. I noticed that you recently removed all content from Polycarpaea robusta. Please do not do this. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. As a rule, if you discover a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If a page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you wish to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jalen Folf (talk) 20:34, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1) You reverted my deletions in Polycarpaea nivea -> that is not ok -> I gave you the reason for my action:

"Polycarpaea robusta is NOT a synonym, but a separate spec. ->https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:156171-1" -> why do you ignore that ?

=> btw: the creator of this false synonyms was Terriffic Dunker Guy -> awful user, indefinitely blocked !!

So plz reactivate my changes - I'm not in the mood for "forth & back games".

2) I wanted to delete the corresponding redirection from P. robusta to nivea - what I did was apparentely not correct, I apologize - so could you plz help to get rid of this false redirection - thx. Miwiki12 (talk) 14:08, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not answering does not speak in your favor ... Miwiki12 (talk) 19:38, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]