User talk:Micsik Krisztián

July 2023

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Five Nights at Freddy's (film) have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Five Nights at Freddy's (film) was changed by Micsik Krisztián (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.881464 on 2023-07-01T16:10:18+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:10, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Elizabeth Lail edit

I have reverted your addition of a birth date to Elizabeth Lail. IMDb is not a reliable source for use in Wikipedia articles. Please see WP:IMDB for comments about it. You might also want to look at WP:USERGENERATED to see some other sources that are similarly unreliable. Eddie Blick (talk) 21:48, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi Micsik Krisztián! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Wikishovel (talk) 17:20, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for helping! also im a hungarian, so i dont really understand some english words :D Micsik Krisztián (talk) 18:38, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shalka Doctor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Master. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:51, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you have added Creative Commons licensed text to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as The Toymaker (Doctor Who). You are welcome to import appropriate Creative Commons licensed content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Compatibly licensed sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any Creative Commons content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 13:36, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Sutekh (Doctor Who) has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. C F A 💬 16:41, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Recent Creations of Doctor Who related articles

Hi there, I've noticed you've been creating various Doctor Who character related articles recently. While I appreciate the effort, I would advise you to please keep in mind several things going forward.

-You cannot plagiarize on Wikipedia. Recent articles you've heavily worked on (such as The Toymaker (Doctor Who) and Sutekh (Doctor Who)) took large swathes of content from other sources, with the latter being tagged as G7 due to the severity of the violations. Please write content in your own words.

-Make sure you're verifying that the subject meets the general notability guideline. Both The Toymaker and the Shalka Doctor have previously been nominated for deletion and redirected to other pages for not meeting the bar needed to have a separate article, and your current revisions of those articles did not demonstrate anything showing them to be significantly and independently notable of the subject. Please add sources that show an impact from the characters, such sources analyzing them or sources detailing the Reception the character has received. I'd familiarize yourself with how other articles on fictional characters do it (A lot of video game characters tend to be consistently good- with exceptions- so I'd suggest starting there.)

-You should upload images through the Wikipedia File Uploader, and not the Commons. The Commons is only used for images that are not under copyright. Both of your images from the Shalka Doctor are screenshots of his works and very much under copyright. I've nominated both for speedy deletion due to copyright violations. If you wish to use images in the future, use the Wikipedia file uploader and fill in all the required fields before uploading.

I appreciate your efforts regardless, but please do bear this in mind in the future so that your articles will not run afoul with other editors for violating various rules or not meeting quality standards. Happy editing, wishing you the best. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 16:48, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Micsik Krisztián Hi, I notice since I've posted this that you've created another article in the form of The General (Doctor Who). I have reverted this per copyright violations and a lack of significant coverage in sources. I understand that it is likely that you have missed this message, so I have made sure to ping you this time. Please be aware that copyright violations such as these are against Wikipedia guidelines, and can land you in a great deal of trouble. I'd advise reviewing the guidelines if you haven't already, and I'm willing to explain things if you need help, but please be aware that if you keep up with persistent violations, you may wind up in greater trouble. Let me know if you have any questions, or if I can help in any way. All the best. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 20:58, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Right, thanks! :D Micsik Krisztián (talk) 21:59, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is the writing of The Meep is not a copyright violation? Micsik Krisztián (talk) 21:59, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Micsik Krisztián from what I can tell, I don't believe the text was directly copied, so it shouldn't be an issue on that front. However, the Meep's image should not be uploaded via Commons, as the images are both under copyright and do not belong to you. Please use Wikipedia's file uploader for something like that.

However, I don't believe the Meep is meeting the general notability guideline covered above, per its recent articles for deletion nomination. A brief search on my part didn't yield many new sources since the last nomination, and most sources covering the Meep had issues due to the fact very few were covering the Meep independently of The Star Beast. I feel this one should probably be redirected.

I will note this sourcing issue is persistent for other articles you've made (Namely Sutekh and the Toymaker) in that the sources covering them did not cover them independently of their returnee episodes, or had a SUSTAINED issue. Sutekh remains to be seen given his episode only aired a few days ago, but the Toymaker seems to have a similar issue. I definitely think the Toymaker's status will change given he seems to be having an important role in the current seasons of the show.

It's a large part in why a large number of Doctor Who character related articles were removed lately, as they too suffered from notability issues or sustained coverage. I feel some current articles still suffer from this, and lots of them need improvements, but newer articles should try their best to adhere to the standards as best as possible, as standards tend to be stricter on newer articles than on old ones, which many are less likely to check. If you want me to explain sourcing a bit more, let me know, since I understand it can be very confusing if you're unfamiliar with it. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 23:59, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Micsik Krisztián I have redirected The Meep per the fact that it actually did contain copyright violations in its text without proper attribution. Additionally, the images are still copyright violations, as they should be uploaded through Wikipedia's file uploader, and not Commons. I have mentioned these issues with copyright violations in the past, and I am afraid I may have to report this if you do not stop with these copyright violations.

I have additionally redirected the Wrarth Warriors do to the fact that they lack significant coverage in reliable sources, with all coverage pertaining to The Star Beast (Doctor Who episode) with the Wrarth only being an aspect of the episode. Another article you created, which is admittedly out of my scope, Dark Jedi, has also being PROD'd by another user for similar reasons. For reference, IMDB is not a reliable source, as any user can edit it and make unreliable content. If you need help with sourcing, please let me know, and I am willing to explain this in further detail.

While your actions seem to be good faith, if you continue to ignore what I'm saying about copyright violations, I will likely have to report this for consistent disruptive action, as Commons has had to deal with removing all violating images and several editors have had to remove infringing edits in the edit history. Please keep this in mind going forward. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 20:33, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dark Jedi (Star Wars fan film)

The article Dark Jedi (Star Wars fan film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence found of notability for this fan film, no reliable independent sources giving significant attention to this.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 16:33, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Never Hike Alone

The article Never Hike Alone has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NFILM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 19:32, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello to yo both, I've redirected both this and the other related fan film. If you think that was a mistake and significant coverage exists, revert me, no worries. Best,-My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 22:09, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(if you have other sources about him and his so far only unchallenged blue film, that also would help)

Disambiguation link notification for July 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Zorii Bliss, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Del Rey.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:12, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Film series characters originally introduced in a film has been nominated for deletion

Category:Film series characters originally introduced in a film has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 21:03, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Canderous Ordo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Canderous Ordo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canderous Ordo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 23:00, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tor Valum for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tor Valum is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tor Valum until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 23:13, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ongoing discussion at Administrator's Noticeboard

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 23:33, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Star Mississippi 01:43, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vincente DiSanti moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Vincente DiSanti. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it is promotional and reads like an advertisement. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 04:05, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Micsik Krisztián (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Because im trying to editing Wikipedia into good, not for copyright.

Decline reason:

In order to lift the block, we need to be certain that you understand how copyright works on Wikipedia. To allow the reviewing administrator to assess your understanding, please respond to the following questions in your next unblock appeal, explaining in your own words:

What is copyright?
How is Wikipedia licenced?
Why is copyrighted content not allowed on Wikipedia?
Under what circumstances can we use copyrighted content?
How do you intend to avoid violating the copyright policy in the future?

Your answers will enable us to establish whether or not you should be unblocked. Yamla (talk) 09:32, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

As you have continued violating copyright while contesting your block for copyright violations, I have revoked talk page access. I'm afraid this clearly demonstrates you either don't understand copyright or hold copyright in contempt. Either way, we need to leave you blocked to protect the project from your violations. --Yamla (talk) 09:41, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Proposed deletion of Jason Rising

The article Jason Rising has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails gng

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]