User talk:Mickyounger

Speedy deletion of NetBox Blue

A tag has been placed on NetBox Blue, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Dethme0w (talk) 04:57, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to be able to restore the text from this deleted file if anyone out there in wikiland is listening...

Someone has moved it to User:Mickyounger/NetBox Blue. You may want to consider getting opinions of other editors before moving it to article-space (where it might end up being deleted again.) ~Kylu (u|t) 14:29, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 03:57, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NetBox Blue

I have restored the page NetBox Blue to User:Mickyounger/NetBox Blue. You may want to talk to Orangemike as he was the one who deleted it. Moving it back into the article space without first addressing the concerns will result in it being deleted once again. J Milburn (talk) 12:59, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

this is the proposed new content

NetBox Blue Pty Ltd was founded in Brisbane by Trent Davis in 1999. It is currently a privately owned company, with majority shareholders all being Australian residents. NetBox Blue’s head office is in Milton, Queensland, Australia, with branch offices in Sydney, Melbourne and London. NetBox Blue has shown installations of their flagship product in 15 countries around the world, and currently claims over 54,000 clients.

NetBox Blue develops enterprise class email, internet and network management solutions, primarily designed for small and medium business. The main product from NetBox Blue is the UTM NetBox. This appliance aims to provide users with a simple, holistic solution for many common business problems. All of the sales, product development and support are based in Australia.

The Unified Threat Management solution runs on a hardened Linux kernel, and can be deployed as an IBM System X rack-mounted server, a VMware instance, or a small form-factor tower.

In a typical deployment, the UTM NetBox has many key features such as :

Anti-spam appliances
Antivirus software
Stateful Firewall
Detailed email & network reporting
Secure Virtual private network
Traffic shaping Quality of service QoS
URL filtering
Quota enforcement
Bandwidth Link aggregation

In late 2006, NetBox Blue aligned themselves closely with IBM, and has since then been working with the technical team to optimize the solution. In recent times, NetBox Blue has achieved Premier level business partnership alliance with IBM.

NetBox Blue has recently announced a mobile security sister company, titled Leopard Labs. The Leopard Labs solution "Protect" claims a reliable, flexible and cost effective way to filter unwanted and inappropriate internet content on mobile phones. The solution is said to be unique because it sits on the handset, avoiding the need for a server-side solution. "Protect" enables a company to provide NetBox - like policies to mobile fleets as well as network based PCs.

External Links

ENEX Testlab independent review
NetBox Blue homepage
ABC Radio interview with Trent Davis
Computerworld news article - NetBox Blue becomes IBM Express Advantage Partner
Computerworld news article - Luxury car retailer eliminates spam burn out
ARN news article - NetBox Blue Braggs global sales expansion
Business Strategy Australasia interview with Trent Davis
ARN news article - Security appliance battles porn in Brisbane

1) This still reads like an advertisement or brochure. Purge it of marketing phrasing like "a simple, holistic solution for many common business problems," "achieved Premier level business partnership alliance with IBM" and "is said to be unique ", as well as the use of the word "solution" anywhere in the article. 2) Only one external link to the subject's own website(s) 3) You need to create real footnotes, not just dump a bunch of stuff at the bottom of the page. See WP:CITE for guidance on how to create footnotes for citations. 3a) A reproduction of a press release is never a reliable source, nor is it evidence of notability. 4) The draft language is in the sandbox, User:Mickyounger/NetBox Blue; it's a waste of space to reproduce it on your talk page. I am copying this to the talk page of the draft article, where it belongs. --Orange Mike | Talk 13:55, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of User:Mickyounger/NetBox Blue

A tag has been placed on User:Mickyounger/NetBox Blue, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Alexius08 (talk) 05:03, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Data 3. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Armbrust ^{Talk to me} _Contribs 10:03, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Data 3 concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Data 3, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 20:02, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission Data 3

Hello Mickyounger. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Data 3.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Data 3}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 15:01, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]