User talk:Metalman28048

August 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. I have noticed that some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Amnesiac (album), have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you to seek consensus for certain edits. Thank you. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 14:08, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Ocean Eyes does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! I would usually suggest that this would be genre warring, but in this case, I don't know how the genre was ever added. Please, explain what you're doing. It makes it easier to figure out when looking at the article history. Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:34, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. I have noticed that some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Snot (band), have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you to seek consensus for certain edits. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:48, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012

Please refrain from changing genres without providing a source and without establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. --IllaZilla (talk) 03:25, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, you may be blocked from editing. --IllaZilla (talk) 03:45, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding continued genre changing without discussion or sources. If you choose to continue, as you did at Love in an Elevator, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- WikHead (talk) 12:32, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. A. B. ^{(talk • contribs)} 20:00, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Lights (Ellie Goulding song), without providing a source and without establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. -- WikHead (talk) 23:30, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Love the Way You Lie, you may be blocked from editing. -- WikHead (talk) 03:29, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding continued genre changing without discussion or sources. If you choose to continue, as you did at Pepper (song), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- WikHead (talk) 03:33, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator's warning

Hi. I am an administrator who has been asked to review your account for possible blocking (again). I see that you seem to be engaged in an editing dispute with other editors.

Please make no further edits to any Wikipedia articles for now without first gaining consensus for them on the article talk pages (such as Talk:Love the Way You Lie) from other, established editors. Otherwise, I or another administrator may block this account without further warning.

Thank you,
--A. B. ^{(talk • contribs)} 03:35, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Even after all the warnings, this clearly demonstrates that you wish to continue jumping from article to article changing music genres to suit your own personal point of view. This type of editing behaviour is very disruptive, consumes valuable user resources, and needs to stop immediately. If you are unable to show us that you can edit constructively without repeatedly diddling with genre-fields, I fully support the blocking of your account for the purpose of protecting the encyclopedia. -- WikHead (talk) 05:06, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As promised

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. A. B. ^{(talk • contribs)} 10:46, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Follow-up: when your block expires, my instruction to you above about getting consensus on the talk page before making any edits to an article -- well, it will still apply. Please heed it.

Thanks! --A. B. ^{(talk • contribs)} 20:45, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Check It Out (song), you may be blocked from editing. -- WikHead (talk) 00:01, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. A. B. ^{(talk • contribs)} 00:11, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but you'll keep getting blocked for longer periods of time until you follow my instructions and get consensus on talk pages before making any edits to our articles. --A. B. ^{(talk • contribs)} 00:13, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding continued genre changing without discussion or sources. If you choose to continue, as you did at Friday I'm in Love, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- WikHead (talk) 20:37, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2013

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding continued genre changing without discussion or sources. If you choose to continue, as you did at Working in the Coal Mine, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Despite numerous warnings and multiple blocks, you have continued to change genres in music articles based solely on your own opinions, even as recently as yesterday. This is your one and only warning for the new year: The next time you change a genre without either (A) citing a source for the change or (B) gaining consensus for the change on the article's talk page, I will report you to the Administrator's Noticeboard immediately for ongoing disruption. --IllaZilla (talk) 00:26, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm IllaZilla. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Joe Escalante, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. It is inappropriate of you to add biography articles to categories indicating that the person is a member of a political party based solely on your own interpretation of that person's beliefs. I have reverted you on Joey Ramone, Joe Escalante, and Lee Ving because none of those articles mention or provide sources for any political party affiliations. In the case of living persons, adding political party affiliations without citing any sources is a violation of the BLP policy. --IllaZilla (talk) 00:26, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2013

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Industrial metal, you may be blocked from editing. Myxomatosis57 (talk) 19:57, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding continued genre changing without discussion or sources. If you choose to continue, as you did at And Your Bird Can Sing, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Dan56 (talk) 17:30, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 03:26, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]