User talk:Moreno.W

This is Moreno.W's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Member.buzz (January 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Member.buzz and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Member.buzz, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 17:40, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Member.buzz! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 17:40, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Member.buzz

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Member.buzz, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. KylieTastic (talk) 17:42, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:

Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bishonen | talk 17:42, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Moreno.W (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Moreno.W (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I was not aware that it was not allowed for the username to be the same as the page name

Decline reason:

You forgot to address your inappropriate edits. Yamla (talk) 01:46, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Moreno.W (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Moreno.W (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I was not aware that it was not allowed for the username to be the same as the page name. Also, the page that i uploaded has now been rewritten by someone else to ensure a more objective and wikipedia worthy wording in the article.

Decline reason:

The proposed new username is acceptable. However, the other elements of the block still need to be addressed. You will not be unblocked until:

you agree to avoid creating or directly editing articles related to your organisation (requested edits will still be permitted)
you agree to abide by the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use and disclose your paid relationship in accordance with the paid contributor policy
you indicate what areas of Wikipedia you intend to edit in the future

If you have no interest in editing Wikipedia beyond writing about your organisation, then you will not be unblocked. If this is the case, I recommend you consider alternative outlets. Yunshui ^雲 _水 10:00, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have globally renamed Member.buzz to Moreno.W, and someone else will review your unblock request. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:53, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What is your relationship with Member buzz? —A little blue Bori v^_^v ^Bori! 22:43, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Moreno.W (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not in any way paid to write the article on the organisation, neither am I being paid by the organisation in any other way. This takes care of the 'paid contributor policy'. To be clear, I am not paid in any way by the organization. I also plan on making additional edits to any locations I see fit to edit. Specifically, in the situation of news events that relates to a person or country, by adding or editing the new situation into the page. Thank you.

Decline reason:

You state "I am not paid in any way by the organization"; this leaves open the possibility that you are paid by someone else, such as working for a firm hired by Member buzz for PR or social media work. Based on the now-deleted draft I believe that you have some sort of conflict of interest that you have not adequately disclosed. As noted above, it is unlikely you will be unblocked without an agreement to not edit about Member buzz, and telling what it is you do intend to edit about. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 19:45, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Moreno.W (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

To be even more clear; I am not paid by the organization, nor a PR firm, nor any other person, business or any other place.

Decline reason:

I am declining as per Yunshui above. User has categorically denied a relationship with the subject. Leaving that be for the nonce, I a willing to unblock on the condition the user tell us what constructive edits they would make and on the condition the user agree to not edit about Member.buzz or any related subject. I await an answer to my question below. Any admin may change the condtions for unblocking or unblock at their discretion.-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 23:04, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Silly question

How did you come to choose the name of this company, Member.buzz, as your Wikipedia user name. I will decline on the same terms Yunshui proposed above. You may not edit about Member.buzz. How will you help to improve Wikipedia, the world's larges free-content encyclopedia? All content must be cited from reliable sources that are unconnected with the subject and have a reputation for fact checking.-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 22:57, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The possibility of UPE exists

My delving deeper leads me to question the accuracy of the user's claims of not meeting the requirements for WP:PAID and WP:COI. Unless some other explanation arises.

-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 23:12, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]