User talk:Megabits000

Welcome!

Hello, Megabits13, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! HiLo48 (talk) 10:54, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jorge Rivera-Herrans (July 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jorge Rivera-Herrans and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 21:44, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Megabits13! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 21:44, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not make false accusations

I gave a perfectly valid reason for removing the fringe content from the article on prehistoric egypt the article gives far to much emphasis on cherrypicked questionable scholarship in defiance of the scholarly consensus these citations have no place in an encyclopedia and your re-addition of them was most destructive to our encyclopedic neutrality. 75.131.101.131 (talk) 00:31, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i will leave that up there, as i go over the sources (again) Megabits000 (talk) 00:35, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I looked through, and dont see anything supporting your claim. @75.131.101.131 please send me a quote of the part that makes you believe that it is incorrect.

thanks, Megabits000 (talk) 00:56, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

for one it relies on studies that rely heavily on skeletal morphology and craniofacial features which are generally considered outmoded methodologies suitable only for preliminary work. Another is that articles on these subjects make heavy use of a S.O.Y Keita study that compares ancient egyptian DNA to only three reference groups Northern Europeans, East Asians, and Sub Saharan Africans with no references to North Africans or Middle Easterners.75.131.101.131 (talk) 02:25, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@75.131.101.131 this is not a fringe theory, this is a study saying that some scientists say that it may or may not be true. what is the issue? Megabits000 (talk) 02:56, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Trouted

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for: YOUR REASON HERE 2601:601:CA7E:29F0:B54E:1702:B3A0:4415 (talk) 03:35, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@2601:601:CA7E:29F0:B54E:1702:B3A0:4415, following Wikipedia:Cite, pages are to be cited. to your very understandable anger, and distress caused by working for a long and having it reverted, I understand. In case you do not know, in the history on any wikipage, you can see edits, even those that have been reverted. The link to your edit is here, and i will try to help if you have any questions.

Awaiting your reply (unless the Benadryl works fast),

Megabits000 (talk) 03:41, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A large part of the added content came from the same article on the German Wikipedia. However, it appears that the German article doesn't really cite any sources either. -- Cosmic6811 🍁 (T · C) 04:06, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I see that in your edit summary you stated that the information came from the "original source biograophy of Carl Friedrich Wilhelm von Reyher, General der Kavallerie und Chef des Generalstabes der Armee. E.S. Mittler & Sohn, Berlin 1861 and 1869, (books.google.de) by Karl Rudolf von Ollech". Add these as references in the main article. -- Cosmic6811 🍁 (T · C) 04:10, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would try, but citations have never worked for me. like, proper formatting, template, everything, and they still dont work. Im going to delegate this one over to you if thats fine. Megabits000 (talk) 04:15, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I do not understand how you undid my edits. The amount of information I contributed to the article is SIGNIFICANT and worked for HOURS to refine the translation. Please undo your undo. The article was a stub with barely any information and I am working on it significantly.

Regarding the 2024 AHS page

In years past, the page for the upcoming season has almost always created in early December and always after the first TSR forecast is out; therefore I don't see why it's too early to create the page OverlyIdioticLemur (talk) 17:48, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@OverlyIdioticLemur What exactly are you talking about? Megabits000 (talk) 17:01, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]