User talk:Meeples
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Boss 302 Mustang
[edit]sorry didn't mean to leave none sense but who ever wrote in the mustang friction section left a wrote a lot of none sense i wasn't trying to argue i was trying to get the point across that this individual is wrong in the throught that bigger engines and numbers should be consider better because they aren't a small engine can be built to put out the same power a big engine does. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.186.189.140 (talk • contribs)
- Please use the article's talk page in the future. ~~ Meeples (talk)(email) 11:04, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi Meeples, I see you removed my comment on Madonnas page, which is fair enough, but I also think that it is plain that the section of the article I commented on is nonsense rantings. It is clearly the opinion (not factual quotings) of a fan, and needs to be cleaned up or removed. Do what you will anyway, and good job keeping the place tidy. x — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.45.196.194 (talk • contribs)
- I'll take a look at the article. Thanks! ~~ Meeples (talk)(email) 12:01, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
I edited the Objectiveness section. I tried not to put any personal comments but a few facts and added sources. If it's out of place, the Criticism section is out of place too. Some artists' articles such as Janet Jackson and Mariah Carey don't even have a Criticism section. It WAS full of rants such as "We all know she can't write lyrics...", "...even for a retard.", "...became the biggest star of the world by hiring the right people..." Some artists' articles such as Janet Jackson and Mariah Carey don't even have a Criticism section. Israell 13:29, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
That's my edit:
However, criticism is often motivated by one's personal opinions, judgements and bias. Madonna's voice has often been criticized but rare were the reviews of her Love Don't Live Anymore cover.
Madonna wrote lyrics such as "Don't go for second best baby. Put your love to the test. You know, you know you've got to make him express how he feels and maybe then you'll know your love is real. -Express Yourself-"[1], "When you walked out my door I knew you'd be back for more. Let's leave the past behind. True love is so hard to find. -Stay-"[2], and "So I went into a bar looking for sympathy, a little company. I tried to find a friend. It's more easily said. It's always been the same. This type of modern life is not for me. This type of modern life is not for free. -American Life-"[3].
Bias, jealousy, and hatred can push someone, even a professional journalist, to write horrible things that they just cannot back up. There is a huge difference between a fact and an opinion. Israell 13:45, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
- I'm sure you've done a considerably better job than I could have. ~~ Meeples (talk)(email) 15:09, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
Kevin Garnett edit
[edit]Sorry, I didn't write "rvv" the first time - the editor before me made a naughty edit.:) (fixed now) cheers--203.214.79.206 12:08, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for setting me straight about this -- I appreciate it. Your warning has been removed, and the proper user notified. ~~ Meeples (talk)(email) 15:09, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
Gemral
[edit]When I messed up your article I was a new member I didn't know what I was doing . I'm so sorry
apology to meeples
[edit]Hi Meeples. I just wanted to say sorry for carrying on too much about you moving my page. I was immature and hope that you can help me if I ever have any questions, because I don't really know much about editing and so on. Sorry again Kate602 02:10, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks Meeples Kate602 02:18, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
It wasn't me spamming Caster Oil
[edit]Regarding the nasty gram I just received when I entered Wiki, it wasn't me spamming the Castor Oil pages. Quite frankly I'm a passive Wiki user and don't even know how to edit a Wiki page.
As you are most certainly aware, a vast majority of the internet users have dynamically assigned IP addresses. Clearly this seems to create a problem in allowing anonymous changes to Wiki, but you should be a little more gentle in you posting lest you discourage the common user from visiting Wiki in the future. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.136.58.42 (talk) 02:29, 14 January 2007 (UTC).
- I am aware of the problem of the wrong user getting such warnings. However, I felt the strength of my warnings were needed because the spamming continued after I first posted a warning. I believe that such warnings are an effective way of actually stopping such activity, and that proved to eventually be the case in this situation. ~~ Meeples (talk)(email) 03:23, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
You helped choose Peloponnesian War as this week's WP:ACID winner
[edit]
AzaBot 12:19, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
Madonna Dispute
[edit]Please come to the Madonna discussion board. There is a dispute going on. Some people felt like the opening paragraphs were glamourizing her but now they are going too far. "fashion icon" was there and was replaced it by "fashion trendsetter". You've had no problem with it. Neither did I. Most people had no problem with it. Now, someone removed it.
"commonly referred to as Queen of Pop" was always there. A few people had a problem with "commonly". It was replaced by "sometimes" and now one of them want it "QOP" completely gone... They also removed the "Confessions Tour" info that was there for weeks. Yet, they have no problem with a Forbes info someone added that is less relevant.
Please voice your opinion there. Thanks! Israell 07:18, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
ummm.... i never edited (or did i even view) that episcopal page in baton rouge... 68.155.67.4
Pizza Hut
[edit]I don't understand why you deleted what i said. it's true.205.250.216.143 05:04, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
Tubists or tuba players?
[edit]Removed cfdnotice, cfd has completed. --Kbdank71 16:37, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
In fact, the discussion covers whether the main category and all of its sub-categories should be Category:Tubaists, Category:Tubists or Category:Tuba players, and so on. Please take any views you have to the discussion page there.
I think that people that know what they are talking about should comment, because there are things being written like, "'tubists' seems clearly incorrect ... to judge by the ... comments."
In the absence of knowledgeable discussion, an outcome based on ignorance can result.
I'm not getting the impression that most of the participants are serious tubists. -- Rico 04:17, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
Notability of Julian Cordero
[edit]
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Julian Cordero, by Tecmobowl, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Julian Cordero seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Julian Cordero, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Julian Cordero itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 05:47, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
- This appears to have been cleared up by an admin already. Frankly, I think the notability is questionable, although it seems most athletes have a page of some sort. Could have gone either way in my opinion. ~~ Meeples (talk)(email) 18:06, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Anglican collaboration of the month
[edit] | The current Anglicanism collaboration effort is St. Luke's Church (Smithfield, Virginia) Voting for the next collaboration is going on now. (Vote here) |
Wassupwestcoast 02:50, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
hey you
[edit]¬¬¬¬i would like to protest about what you have said... i did not edit that page... i would like to be a member of wikipedia. can you teach me how? you can contact me at jooliankrestofr_040490@yahoo.com Thank You. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.60.241.75 (talk) 06:45, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
Obama on the Hussein page
[edit]What is there to cite? Hussein is his middle name. Stop bringin political bias into this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.249.185.205 (talk) 05:48, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
- Spelling his name right would be a good first step. ~~ Meeples (talk)(email) 05:53, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
thank you
[edit]mr meeples, and might i add that is a HANDSOME moniker,
i am responding to your dislike of my redefining the word "banshee" to mean what it actually means.
well, i see what you mean, but only because your message helpfully linked me to the definition of vandalism. thank you for including that, i am now aware of the error of my ways, and will continue to do what i want!!!! hahahaa — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.160.70.244 (talk • contribs)
- Glad you like the name. ~~ Meeples (talk)(email) 06:09, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
GoDaddy article
[edit]This anonymous edit was in fact in good faith, contributed to the article, and even came with a descriptive edit summary. Perhaps you should be a little less zealous in your quest to rid Wikipedia of vandalism. --RucasHost (talk) 23:39, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for your comment, but this is not a notable link. ~~ Meeples (talk)(email) 23:46, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
- ORLY? From the article you neglected to read:
- Lyon has since launched the web site NoDaddy.Com to Criticize GoDaddy policies.
- --RucasHost (talk) 00:01, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you. I'm not saying I'm correct here -- although I believe I am -- but I think we're at the point where we need discussion first. ~~ Meeples (talk)(email) 00:58, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
- I think we need some discussion too, and he doesn't seem to be open to it. GreenJoe 01:12, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
- To summarize what I've seen here -- the source you cited in the quote above is a blog -- not valid in this case to show notability. I again say we need discussion, and that's what the talk page is here to do. Let's use it! ~~ Meeples (talk)(email) 01:13, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
We can edit Go Daddy in peace. An admin blocked him. GreenJoe 01:45, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
| You are cordially invited to participate in WikiProject Christianity
The goal of WikiProject Christianity is to improve the quality and quantity of information about Christianity available on Wikipedia. WP:X as a group does not prefer any particular tradition or denominination of Christianity, but prefers that all Christian traditions are fairly and accurately represented. |
|
- Tinucherian (talk) 10:38, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Baseball Newsletter
[edit]
The Baseball WikiProject Newsletter | |
This month's newsletter was designed and written by Wizardman, jj137, and Blackngold29. If you would like to contribute to future newsletters, please contact the Baseball WP outreach dept. |
Baseball has a history unlike any other sport. It has been played in countless countries throughout the decades, and it will undoubtedly continue play for many more. On this eve, some the finest players the sport has to offer will take the field at the Yankee Stadium. Four popes spoke there, Pelé scored goals there, "The Greatest [football] Game Ever Played" was battled out there, John Philip Sousa lead a band there, George Costanza worked there; but what do all these events have in common? They fail to reach the level of greatness that the baseball that was played there did. In 1923, a man named Babe Ruth decided to build a new house, and over the years, that house was a home to some of the greatest baseball ever played. If I were to list out all of these great moments, it would be longer than the bill for the New Yankee Stadium. So I'll sum it up by saying that we can remember these great moments by adding them to this place we've gathered at for future generations to read about, to learn about, to dream about; but more importantly we can watch tonight and we can remember how baseball is unlike anything else that we will encounter in our lives. — Blackngold29 |
-- jj137 (talk) 03:11, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Todd Boyd
[edit]The publishing companies from the 4 books Dr. Boyd has written verify that he has received his Ph.D from the University of Iowa. Short of showing you the actual diploma or Dr. Boyd's records, this is the best way to prove where Dr. Boyd received his Ph.D. 128.125.146.96 (talk) 16:53, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
October Baseball WikiProject Newsletter
[edit]|
The Baseball WikiProject Newsletter | |
List of New York Mets Opening Day starting pitchers, List of Colorado Rockies Opening Day starting pitchers, List of Florida Marlins Opening Day starting pitchers, Nashville Sounds seasons, List of Tampa Bay Rays Opening Day starting pitchers, List of Seattle Mariners Opening Day starting pitchers, List of Boston Red Sox Opening Day starting pitchers, List of Arizona Diamondbacks Opening Day starting pitchers, New York Yankees seasons
All the Way (Eddie Vedder song), Cy Young, Dan Brouthers, Harmon Killebrew, Rickey Henderson, Billy Pierce, Kinston Indians, Three Rivers Stadium, Bill Lange, Calgary Cannons, Hugh Daily, Homer at the Bat This month's newsletter was designed and written by Wizardman, jj137, and Blackngold29. If you would like to contribute to future newsletters, please contact the Baseball WP outreach dept. |
We apologize for not sending out our August newsletter, we have tried to cover some events of the month in this issue. The playoffs have started! The Dodgers and Phillies have won their respective Division Series and will face off in the NL Championship Series. Both series in the American League have yet to be finished. Show your support for your favorite teams by keeping up with their season pages! |
-- jj137 (talk) 00:20, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
Unreferenced BLPs
[edit]
Hello Meeples! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 24 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:
- Julian Cordero - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 06:45, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
Nomination of Julian Cordero for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Julian Cordero is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julian Cordero until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. – Muboshgu (talk) 05:01, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
Ichthus: January 2012
[edit] |
ICHTHUS |
| January 2012 |
In this issue...
- From the Editor
- What are You doing For Lent?
- Fun and Exciting Contest Launched
- Spotlight on WikiProject Catholicism
For submissions contact the Newsroom • To unsubscribe add yourself to the list here
Removal of Old Warning
[edit]The warning on "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:71.31.208.191" is out of date. I got this message randomly when I closed the 'book creator' I accidentally opened up. This user's IP has already changed, so this message is not relevant anymore. I advise the removal of this page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.31.208.191 (talk) 03:28, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
WP:Anglican navbox colour discussion
[edit]Hullo, fellow WikiProject-er. We're having a discussion about the colours of Anglicanism navboxes. Please do come along and weigh in. DBD 18:34, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:10, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Edit-a-thon in Madison
[edit] |
.jpg) |
Meeples, I'd like to invite you to an upcoming edit-a-thon:
- Saturday, March 5th, 9:30 a.m. – noon
- Madison Public Library (Madison, Wisconsin)
- Bring a laptop! There will be snacks and daycare
RSVP on the event page if you plan to attend or have any suggestions. czar 00:53, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
- You received this message because you are a member of Category:Wikipedians in Wisconsin. To opt-in to future Madison event messages, add yourself to the mailing list.