User talk:Maxkelley550

Per "Darth Sidious" versus "Palpatine"

Hello! As the reverting editor to your edits on Star Wars: Episode III – Revenge of the Sith, I recommend reading the edit summary I made in my reversion of your edit to understand why I have done so, that being that "Palpatine" is the name more commonly used throughout the film in question over "Darth Sidious" and there is a great interest in keeping the plot summary at its more clear and consistent, then perhaps discussing any further desired changes on this topic on that article's talk page! I recommend being cognizant of the BOLD, revert, discuss cycle and the three-revert rule before engaging in further edits before discussing them. Also noticing your edit summary on your edit to Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker, I also recommend you read the policy on ownership of content going into the future. ~Cheers, Ten Ton Parasol 23:58, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Hi, Maxkelley550! I see that you changed all instances of "Palpatine" to "Sidious" in the article Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker, and I wanted to let you know that I've reverted these changes. Mainly because Wikipedia has rules regarding edits for bypassing redirects, and for the usage of common names in articles. Although you didn't do anything wrong here, I've restored the previous version since this would be beneficial to the average reader who wouldn't know much about Star Wars. I hope you understand. If you have any other questions, please feel free to ask it on the Teahouse or on my talk page. Thanks! Chlod (say hi!) 00:00, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

P.S.: Regarding your edit summary, "No one undos these edits of mine. Understand. That's an order", I'd like to inform you that edits may be reverted at any time if they conflict with Wikipedia policies and guidelines. No one owns an article, and a revert can be done if an editor sees that it is the best option for the wiki. Chlod (say hi!) 00:00, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Maxkelley550 I have reverted your edit as per the post above - changing Palpatine to Darth Sidious. Your revert is contrary to WP:BRD and has the potential of contravening WP:3RR and WP:WAR. Please read the articles at these links to understand Wikipedia protocols. If there is anything you don't understand about this revert please start a new post at the article talk page. Thanks. Robynthehode (talk) 21:13, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Galactic Empire (Star Wars), did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dirkbb (talk) 01:24, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jedi. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dirkbb (talk) 01:25, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Mace Windu, you may be blocked from editing. Dirkbb (talk) 01:26, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kylo Ren. Dirkbb (talk) 01:28, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

You've been changing Palpatine to Sidious against clear consensus for a while now. This non-templated warning that I am giving you now will serve as a final warning. If I see you do it again, I will block your account. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:17, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, scratch that. I just remembered about the account Maxikelley62063, which I blocked last year. You are abusing multiple accounts and I am blocking this account right now. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:20, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:21, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]