User talk:Aum9n

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Matthew Meta! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 331 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Yuji Shimada - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 07:44, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Review of draft article requested

Greetings. I have completed a new draft of Shakespeare authorship question, a problematic article about a minority viewpoint. I would sincerely appreciate input from some uninvolved editors, such as yourself, who would be willing to review the article for its overall structure and format, as well as any NPOV or WEIGHT issues that have not been addressed. Does the article progression make sense? How about the section heads? Are the in-text attributions handled properly? Are there any major issues that jump out at you? Here is the latest draft that I am requesting comments on: [[1]]. If you are able to help in any way, please leave comments here or on my talk page. Thanks.Smatprt (talk) 18:14, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Prod of Abandoned footwear

Hi,

I have removed the prod tag from Abandoned footwear. Articles that have had a previous deletion discussion are not eligible for deletion by prod (see WP:PROD). If you still think the article should be deleted, you should start a new deletion discussion at WP:AFD. Calathan (talk) 04:42, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]