Jump to content

User talk:Matarisvan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

September 2023

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Abaqati family have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:32, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Field hockey at the 2022 Asian Games – Women's tournament, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Navneet Kaur. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Muḥammad ibn Ibrāhīm al-Fazārī, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brill.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kala Nath Shastry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bharati.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Rajiv Malhotra

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Rajiv Malhotra you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AirshipJungleman29 -- AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 20:22, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Rajiv Malhotra

[edit]

The article Rajiv Malhotra you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Rajiv Malhotra for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AirshipJungleman29 -- AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 23:03, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2024 February newsletter

[edit]

The 2024 WikiCup is off to a flying start, with 135 participants. This is the largest number of participants we have seen since 2017.

Our current leader is newcomer Generalissima (submissions), who has one FA on John Littlejohn (preacher) and 10 GAs and 12 DYKs mostly on New Zealand coinage and Inuit figures. Here are some more noteworthy scorers:

As a reminder, competitors may submit work for the first round until 23:59 (UTC) on 27 February, and the second round starts 1 March. Remember that only the top 64 scoring competitors will make it through to the second round; currently, competitors need at least 15 points to progress. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAN, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:58, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Ranks and decorations" edit conflict in Sam Manekshaw webpage

[edit]

Hello User:Matarisvan It has been observed that you have spent considerable time editing the Wikipedia webpage on Sam Manekshaw. In particular, you have chosen to remove the "Dates of Rank" and "Awards and decorations" subsection from the webpage. Kindly remember, the subject person is from the military, thus making the promotions he received and the awards he was conferred upon a part of his history, in a professional context.

For reference, look up to the Wikipedia pages of other military officer, particularly field marshals - like K.M. Cariappa, Sarath Fonseka, Ayub Khan, etc...This is a public webpage, and both his ranks and decorations are public attations to his prowess as a military officer. Do not make edits just because you like to.

Yours sincerely. Silver Pavilion (talk) 13:54, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Discretionary sanctions alert

[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

09:54, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

Disruptive editing

[edit]

Don't call vandalism a "vandalism". You are violating WP:NPA.

You need to stop edit warring at J. Sai Deepak. Whitewashing will not work. Abhishek0831996 (talk) 09:54, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on J. Sai Deepak. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 09:14, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, it was not my intention to engage in edit warring, but the constant vandalism by the user @Abhishek0831996 forced me to do so. I have asked for a third opinion at Wikipedia:Third opinion, but haven't received one yet. Matarisvan (talk) 09:57, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on J. Sai Deepak. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. See talk page. Per ONUS, it is up to you to get consensus. This is being contested. I also see you were previously warned for edit warring a little over a week ago. Please stop. CNMall41 (talk) 20:43, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This comment is a little concerning. As you stated you do not wish to discuss with me I would instead suggest you take it up at ANI if you feel I am out of line. You started a RfC to get consensus and once that is complete we will hopefully have it. Until then, the WP:ONUS is still on you. --CNMall41 (talk) 20:44, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your WikiCup submission: Wikipedia:Peer review/Fountain Fire/archive1

[edit]

Hi Matarisvan, thanks for participating in the WikiCup. You recently submitted Wikipedia:Peer review/Fountain Fire/archive1 for PR points in the WikiCup, but you do not seem to have conducted your review yet. As per Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring#Peer reviews, you may claim points when your review is finished. If you haven't completed your review by 27 February, unfortunately this would not be eligible for points. – Epicgenius (talk) 01:24, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will post my comments there soon. My apologies for the hastiness in updating the submissions before getting the PR done. Matarisvan (talk) 04:29, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2024 March newsletter

[edit]

The first round of the 2024 WikiCup ended at 23:59 (UTC) on 27 February. Everyone with at least 30 points moved on to Round 2, the highest number of points required to advance to the second round since 2014. Due to a six-way tie for the 64th-place spot, 67 contestants have qualified for Round 2.

The following scorers in Round 1 all scored more than 300 points:

In this newsletter, the judges would like to pay a special tribute to Vami_IV (submissions), who unfortunately passed away this February. At the time of his death, he was the second-highest-scoring competitor. Outside the WikiCup, he had eight other featured articles, five A-class articles, eight other good articles, and two Four Awards. Vami also wrote an essay on completionism, a philosophy in which he deeply believed. If you can, please join us in honoring his memory by improving one of the articles on his to-do list.

Remember that any content promoted after 27 February but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss content, not editors

[edit]

TrangaBellam is also mostly a culture war editor, and is trying to remove all traces of non culture war cases from here.

Editor conduct cases shall be discussed at WP:AN and not at article talk-pages. See WP:NPA. TrangaBellam (talk) 23:29, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kayqubadiyya Palace, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brill.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:05, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Peer review of Charles Edward, Duke of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha

[edit]

Hello @Matarisvan, thank you for the help you have given in the peer review. It's been a while since you last edited. Do you want to make any more comments or shall I close up the review? Llewee (talk) 12:29, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited INS Rajput (D51), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page C band.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:08, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2024 April newsletter

[edit]

We are approaching the end of the 2024 WikiCup's second round, with a little over two weeks remaining. Currently, contestants must score at least 105 points to progress to the third round.

Our current top scorers are as follows:

Competitors may submit work for the second round until the end of 28 April, and the third round starts 1 May. Remember that only competitors with the top 32 scores will make it through to the third round. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAN, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs. As a reminder, competitors are strictly prohibited from gaming Wikipedia policies or processes to receive more points.

If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please read Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:05, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm MuffinHunter0. I noticed that you recently removed content from Nirbhay without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Muffin(Spreading Democracy, one edit at a time) 18:37, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please use your sandbox before doing massive deletion of content next time. Muffin(Spreading Democracy, one edit at a time) 18:38, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I had made some grammatical edits but there was an edit conflict as someone had made changes to the article before I could publish. I copied my text and put it into the text box, but because I was editing on a mobile device, only a few lines of my text got copied. I hit publish before reviewing as I thought all the text had been pasted, but the mobile clipboard could hold only a few lines. I will be sure to not try to resolve edit conflicts on mobile devices from now on, thank you. Matarisvan (talk) 18:41, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds good! Guess my warning was a mistake. Please continue improving the quality of the page. Muffin(Spreading Democracy, one edit at a time) 18:51, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2024 May newsletter

[edit]

The second round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 28 April. This round was particularly competitive: each of the 32 contestants who advanced to Round 3 scored at least 141 points. This is the highest number of points required to advance to Round 3 since 2014.

The following scorers in Round 2 all scored more than 500 points:

The full scores for Round 2 can be seen here. So far this year, competitors have gotten 18 featured articles, 22 featured lists, and 186 good articles, 76 in the news credits and at least 200 did you know credits. They have conducted 165 featured article reviews, as well as 399 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 21 articles to featured topics and good topics.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 April but before the start of Round 3 can be claimed during Round 3, which starts on 1 May at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.

If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please see this page. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:37, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FAC

[edit]

Hi. I understand your frustration with the WP:FAC process, but I don't think saying your reviewers have acted in bad faith is a productive way forward. RoySmith (talk) 14:28, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have any frustrations with the FAC process, nor with all reviewers, just the particular one, who has gone to great lengths to derail my nominations for that article. Matarisvan (talk) 14:42, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Dude stop digging your hole deeper. Who on Earth do you think will be interested in reviewing any of your FACs if instead of pointing out possible mistakes in the reviews you start flinging accusations of racism and personal animosity? Your best course of action would be to apologise to SchroCat and mean it. Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI (talk to me!/my edits) 03:05, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you had read my comments fully then you would know I focused more on pointing out mistakes in the review than these so called accusations. That reviewer did not address any of my points, just bemoaned their actual modus operandi being revealed, which is what they did at the last two peer reviews and FACs. Anyways, I will not put up any of my work for FA or FL candidacy until the coordinators are from this cabal. Matarisvan (talk) 03:55, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Doesn't matter if your personal attack was posted with ten other points or if it was there as is. It's still a personal attack. This is not Instagram or YouTube, it is in your best interest to stop arguing. Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI (talk to me!/my edits) 07:38, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Regency of Algiers PRG

[edit]

Hi Matarisvan, how goes it? In the PRG you did for the Regency article, you left a comment "The Igawawen flag on the article and here are very different, consider using the former?". There seems to be some confusion about what it exactly means? Was there a Igawawen flag in the article. Both Nour and myself can't fathom the comment. scope_creepTalk 12:05, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Northrop YF-23, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AWACS.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Regency of Algiers

[edit]

@Matarisvan: Can you expand the lede please per the peer review request. scope_creepTalk 07:47, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Galatian War, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tactics.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Undefined sfn reference in Galatian War

[edit]

Hi, in this edit to Galatian War you use {{Sfn|Hall|1959|pp=115-116}}, but there is no work "Hall 1959" listed. I suspect, from the rest of the edit, you meant to use "Bean 1959", or possibly "Hall 1986". If you could fix this that would be appreciated. DuncanHill (talk) 10:49, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done, it is the latter. I was wondering why there was a harv-error tag on my edit. Thanks for finding that one. Matarisvan (talk) 11:11, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for fixing it so quickly. DuncanHill (talk) 11:18, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2024 July newsletter

[edit]

The third round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 28 June. As with Round 2, this round was competitive: each of the 16 contestants who advanced to Round 4 scored at least 256 points.

The following editors all scored more than 400 points in Round 3:

The full scores for round 3 can be seen here. So far this year, competitors have gotten 28 featured articles, 38 featured lists, 240 good articles, 92 in the news credits, and at least 285 did you know credits. They have conducted 279 featured article reviews, as well as 492 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 22 articles to featured topics and good topics.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 June but before the start of Round 4 can be claimed during Round 4, which starts on 1 July at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether for a good article, featured content, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.

If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please see this page. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:30, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations from the Military History Project

[edit]
 Content Review Medal of Merit (Military history) 
On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Content Review Medal of Merit (Military history) for participating in 11 reviews between April and June 2024. Hawkeye7 (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 05:06, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Many thanks @Hawkeye7! Matarisvan (talk) 13:51, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste {{WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space

In appreciation

[edit]
The Good Article Rescue Barnstar
This is presented to you by the GAR process in recognition of your sterling work in helping Galatian War retain its Good Article status. Please feel free to display the GA icon on your userpage. Keep up the good work! ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 10:50, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Many thanks @AirshipJungleman29! To answer your question if I am still planning to work on the 3 GA reassessments I was working on, I indeed plan to do so. However, the timeline will be a little delayed because I'm working on 2 A class reassessments, these 3 + 1, and an FA reassessment. Also, do you think I could put up this article for FA review? Matarisvan (talk) 13:54, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure—it's not my speciality, so you may want to nominate it for a peer review or MilHist A-class first. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 14:46, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Macandrew

[edit]

Hi, thanks very much for your ACR and FAC reviews for Henry Macandrew. I know this is something you offered at ACR, and wondered whether you might be kind enough to provide a source review at FAC? No problem if you can't! Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 17:08, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Pickersgill-Cunliffe, I will get that done today or tomorrow. Also, I would really appreciate it if you could add your comments at a recent PR I just opened, linked here. Matarisvan (talk) 08:02, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'll take a look probably early next week when I'm off work. Thanks! Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 18:32, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

IP block exempt

[edit]

I have granted your account an exemption from IP blocking. This will allow you to edit the English Wikipedia through full blocks affecting your IP address when you are logged in.

Please read the page Wikipedia:IP block exemption carefully, especially the section on IP block exemption conditions. Inappropriate usage of this user right may result in revocation. I hope this will enhance your editing, and allow you to edit successfully and without disruption. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:27, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Milhist tags

[edit]

You are WILDLY overdoing these, for figures with very little military connection, like the notoriously unwarlike Richard II of England. Please stop. Johnbod (talk) 01:14, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I thought as much, but wanted to err on the safer side. Which ones would you suggest don't come under the WPMH mandate? I'll remove them at once. Matarisvan (talk) 04:13, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kazhdan 1991a

[edit]

You broke it again. DuncanHill (talk) 10:40, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will try to get it fixed soon. Perhaps changing Kazhdan 1991 to 1991a and 1991a to 1991b will work, but I'm not sure. Would you happen to have a solution to this problem that ensures the source is still consolidated? Matarisvan (talk) 11:47, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If I knew what you were trying to do I might. But frankly using sfn refs is just asking for trouble, it's a horrible system. DuncanHill (talk) 17:48, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2024 August newsletter

[edit]

The fourth round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 29 August. Each of the 8 contestants who advanced to Round 4 scored at least 472 points, and the following contestants scored more than 700 points:

Congratulations to our eight finalists and all who participated. Contestants put in extraordinary amounts of effort during this round, and their scores can be seen here. So far this year, competitors have gotten 36 featured articles, 55 featured lists, 15 good articles, 93 in the news credits, and at least 333 did you know credits. They have conducted 357 featured content reviews, as well as 553 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 30 articles to featured topics and good topics.

Any content promoted after 29 August but before the start of Round 5 can be claimed during Round 5, which starts on 1 September at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. If two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether for a good article, featured content, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Remember to claim your points within 14 days of earning them, and importantly, before the deadline on 31 October.

If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please see this page. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:12, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for coordinators is now open!

[edit]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:41, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You've got mail

[edit]
Hello, Matarisvan. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. asilvering (talk) 20:00, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Original Barnstar
For your valuable feedback on Nezak Huns and not missing out on the small details. TrangaBellam (talk) 20:01, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks @TrangaBellam. Please excuse my delayed response. Lmk when you put the article up for GA or FA. Cheers Matarisvan (talk) 04:38, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open!

[edit]

Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open! A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. Register your vote here by 23:59 UTC on 29 September! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:34, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations!

[edit]
 The Coordinator stars 
On behalf of the members of WikiProject Military history, in recognition of your election to the position of Coordinator, I take great pleasure in presenting you with the Coordinator's stars, and wish you the best of luck for the coming year! Hawkeye7 (discuss) 00:09, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks @Hawkeye7! Looking forward to working all out on the project this year. Cheers Matarisvan (talk) 10:42, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

USS Texas (BB-35) A-Class reappraisal

[edit]

I did not add your name to be notified in the discussion of this topic on the coordinator talk page for you to become involved (which you haven't). My purpose was to show you one of the few requests or problems that come up in one form or another that are not well understood - by me after a year as a coordinator and I think by most people as well. The handling of most coordinator tasks that come up can be found in various project review and procedure pages or academy pages. Experienced coordinators often can answer some other questions. I am still not sure where this type of A-class reassessment is covered in enough detail so that anyone who does not have experience in handling it can feel comfortable about setting up or proceeding with one.

You can see by the discussion on this topic that this type of reassessment can be puzzling. I usually try to stay away from A class reassessments. They don't seem to come up very often but it seems that only a few people understand how to handle this since it is not under the general Wikipedia wide processes in the same way that featured article/list and GA reviews and reassessments are handled. It is complicated by the fact that the military history project has retained project control on A-class assessments, which after 3 general reviews, a source review and an image review, must be approved by an uninvolved coordinator. (Experienced users or coordinators usually handle the various reviews.) In turn, that puts the reassessments back into the project for ultimate processing. Even now, I am not quite sure how the A-class reassessments are to be set up and finally reviewed or decided. It may be similar to GA reassessments but require more comment and ultimate decision by an uninvolved coordinator.

I add this here only as information since I know it is not providing much enlightenment. As I have time, I will try to get a handle on this and let you know if I can say anything more definite. If you need to know any more at this time, Hawkeye7 definitely understands this and maybe a few others, including Hog Farm, do as well. My advice would be to just wait and see how this one is handled for any further explanation.

Congratulations on becoming a coordinator. Donner60 (talk) 05:28, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much @Donner60, and many congratulations on your reelection. I'm thinking of rewriting the article underlying this reassessment myself. I'll post on the review page if I'll be doing it. Looking forward to the work to be done this season and many more upcoming ones. Cheers Matarisvan (talk) 05:35, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I set up the A-class reassessment. There is a procedure I documented. There's some tricky bits, but it is fairly mechanical. I may get the bot to do it in the future; I have to check to see whether the Page Mover bit is required. The handling of A-class goes back before I joined the project. See Wikipedia talk:Content assessment/Archive 5 for the history. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 09:51, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Matarisvan: As information, see Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/USS Texas (BB-35). It shows up on Military history WikiProject, Articles for review list as an A-class review, not separately as a reassessment. I note that Hawkeye7 set the reassessment up for voorts. He copied the points that voorts raised. Then he said he did not agree with one of the points made with the reason. I don't agree with it either. So it now seems clear to me that a coordinator sets up the A-class reassessment for the user who requests it with the rationale provided by that user. Donner60 (talk) 00:45, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In appreciation

[edit]
The Premium Reviewer Barnstar
For your consistent and thorough source reviews for nominations at FAC. I, and I'm sure many others, really appreciate it. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:02, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks @AirshipJungleman29! Looking forward to doing many more and helping out at FAC. Cheers Matarisvan (talk) 17:05, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations from the Military History Project

[edit]
 The WikiChevrons 
On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the WikiChevrons for participating in 23 reviews between July and September 2024. Hawkeye7 (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 00:30, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In appreciation

[edit]
The Good Article Rescue Barnstar
This is presented to you by the GAR process in recognition of your sterling work in helping Siege of Szigetvár retain its Good Article status. Please feel free to display the GA icon on your userpage. Keep up the good work! ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 18:32, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Many thanks, @AirshipJungleman29! Matarisvan (talk) 19:00, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2024 November newsletter

[edit]

The 2024 WikiCup has come to an end, with the final round being a very tight race. Our new champion is AirshipJungleman29 (submissions), who scored 2,283 points mainly through 3 high-multiplier FAs and 3 GAs on military history topics. By a 1% margin, Airship beat out last year's champion, Delaware BeanieFan11 (submissions), who scored second with 2,264 points, mainly from an impressive 58 GAs about athletes. In third place, Generalissima (submissions) scored 1,528 points, primarily from two FAs on U.S. Librarians of Congress and 20 GAs about various historical topics. Our other finalists are: Sammi Brie (submissions) with 879 points, Canada Hey man im josh (submissions) with 533 points, BennyOnTheLoose (submissions) with 432 points, Arconning (submissions) with 244 points, and Christmas Island AryKun (submissions) with 15 points. Congratulations to our finalists and all who participated!

The final round was very productive, and contestants had 7 FAs, 9 FLs, 94 GAs, 73 FAC reviews, and 79 GAN reviews and peer reviews. Altogether, Wikipedia has benefited greatly from the activities of WikiCup competitors all through the contest. Well done everyone!

All those who reached the final will receive awards and the following special awards will be made, based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, these prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round, or in the event of a tie, to the overall leader in this field.

Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2025 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement!

If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:48, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Asking for a favour

[edit]

Hey, @Matarisvan, do you have the time to also comment on my FA nominee? Amir Ghandi (talk) 10:03, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations now open for the WikiProject Military history newcomer of the year and military historian of the year

[edit]

Nominations now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2024! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Nominations are open here and here respectively. The nomination period closes at 23:59 on 30 November 2024 when voting begins. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:21, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Matarisvan&oldid=1258306434"