User talk:Masierra2008

This is Masierra2008's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 26)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

Theroadislong (talk) 16:50, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Masierra2008! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 16:50, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Hello, Masierra2008, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 16:51, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Masierra2008. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Masierra2008. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Masierra2008|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 331dot (talk) 12:58, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You still have not adequately responded or taken action to the inquiry regarding your appearance as an undisclosed paid editor. If you make any additional edits without complying, you may be blocked from editing. DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:51, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Aw... Come on. Okay. That stinks. I don't want to be blocked and lose all my articles. Masierra2008 (talk) 12:39, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You will be blocked if your next edit is anything other than at least an attempt to comply with WP:PAID. 331dot (talk) 12:41, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Sorry... Still learning from my mistakes. No biggie. Masierra2008 (talk) 12:43, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think you're taking this entirely seriously. You were asked by 331dot to make a paid-editing disclosure as your very next edit, and instead you've submitted a sandbox draft User:Masierra2008/sandbox... which is what, exactly? (And why is some of it copied from my user page?) -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:10, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And another thing: what user accounts, other than this Masierra2008 one, do you operate, or have you operated in the past? I'm assuming Mateosierra2K8, but any others? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:12, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have operated @Masierra10 and @Msiecloud and @Masierra722 etc. Masierra2008 (talk) 15:11, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning if you make any further edits without responding to the inquiry you received regarding undisclosed paid editing. 331dot (talk) 19:23, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. You're the boss. Masierra2008 (talk) 20:26, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But I still might need my articles published. Masierra2008 (talk) 20:26, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:Mega Man (film), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Trailblazer101 (talk) 23:06, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Medusa Film (August 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Utopes was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No references. Looks copied as the format for "[ edit , edit source ]" remains.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Medusa Film and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 17:57, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Medusa Film (August 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Medusa Film and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 18:11, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What mistake did I make? Masierra2008 (talk) 19:43, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The notices above have the key requirements in bullet points but in general all new articles on Wikipedia have to show the subject is notable (See WP:N) which in most cases requires significant coverage (WP:SIGCOV) in multiple independent (WP:INDY) reliable sources (WP:RS). Also none of the content is sourced/referenced. KylieTastic (talk) 19:47, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Masierra2008/sandbox

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Masierra2008/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Theroadislong (talk) 13:02, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh no! Thanks for telling me! Masierra2008 (talk) 14:18, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please respond to the comments above regarding paid editing(you may respond below) 331dot (talk) 14:27, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Medusa Film (August 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This could be notable, but the few sources cited offer zero evidence of that.

Most of the content is unreferenced – where is all this information coming from?

And none of the items listed under 'References' are that; they're just links.

See WP:REFB for advice on referencing.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Medusa Film and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:50, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What is going on? I fixed everything I saw. I think it should be published by the time it's ready for you to publish Draft:Medusa Film. Masierra2008 (talk) 20:25, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Huanyu Entertainment (August 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

zero improvement since previous decline.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Huanyu Entertainment and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 20:42, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Awww... I hope Draft:Medusa Film will still be able to be published immediately in no time. Masierra2008 (talk) 20:44, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You need to tell us what your connection is to this film now- see WP:PAID and WP:COI. You also need to clarify if you personally created and personally own the copyright to the company logo. 331dot (talk) 20:49, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay! 😉 Masierra2008 (talk) 13:02, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 28)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:07, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Masierra2008 (talk) 14:02, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

331dot (talk) 15:32, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry, @331dot. Masierra2008 (talk) 23:23, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Masierra2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't understand, like I didn't do anything like vandalism except make my own articles. I did not violate anything. What is the purpose and meaning of this? I'm trying to fix my work and put more stuff so you can accept submit! 😒 Masierra2008 (talk) 16:56, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is not a free webhost. If you wish to be unblocked, convince us you understand what you were doing wrong and tell us what subject areas you'd write about instead. Hint: WP:COI, WP:PROMO. Yamla (talk) 17:01, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Masierra2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Okay, I admit it. I'm sorry for disrespecting Wikipedia and I'm sorry for violating Wikimedia's Foundation's Terms of use, I was trying to make an article. I'm sorry for making promotional edits to topics in which I had a financial stake, even though I'm 16. Can you please give me another chance?Masierra2008 (talk) 14:52, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

What edits do you want to make, if unblocked? PhilKnight (talk) 18:19, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You are not permitted to remove declined unblock requests for your currently active block. Do not do so again. --Yamla (talk) 16:36, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are also not permitted to modify a declined unblock request. Leave them alone. I'm not even sure why you were trying to do that. You already have an open unblock request. If you muck about with your declined unblock requests again, you'll lose access to your talk page. --Yamla (talk) 17:28, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) While waiting for an admin to come along and consider your appeal, why not take this opportunity to list here the other accounts you are operating, or have operated in the past? I asked this before, but you seem to have ignored that question for some reason. Thanks in advance, --DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:52, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. I understand. Masierra2008 (talk) 18:03, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This does not answer the question. --Yamla (talk) 20:04, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Masierra2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

But what I meant was, I have created so many accounts that I mean... I can't take a break from it, @Yamla. My answer to what I did is, I created an article that's not supposed to be copyrighted. All I did was try to get someone to submit it, but all I did was make things worse... I just wanted to make a Wikipedia page and not steal people's other stuff. I am truly sorry for unpaid editing violation, I hope you can accept my apology and unblock me. That's all. I feel your feeling. And I just feel sorry as is. I just felt like it was a good idea, but it wasn't. Everyone was right. Wikipedia's not a free web host service. Hope you understand. Masierra2008 (talk) 23:21, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Could you list all the accounts you have created? PhilKnight (talk) 18:19, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I wish @331dot just left me alone and did not block me in the first or second place. 😒 Masierra2008 (talk) 15:18, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I wish @331dot would just leave me alone. 😒 Masierra2008 (talk) 15:17, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Masierra2008 (talk) 23:21, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is there anyway @Yamla can just accept me and get me unblocked? I need to focus on my other articles! Please! Masierra2008 (talk) 15:21, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Incessantly pinging admins is one of the most effective ways of having your user page editing rights revoked. Just FYI. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:23, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, hi @DoubleGrazing. Is there anything I can do to fix things? Masierra2008 (talk) 15:25, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'd be happy to say... It has been a long time since I've been blocked! BTW, what do you mean revoked? Masierra2008 (talk) 15:28, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @DoubleGrazing, what happens if block has already expired in about a few weeks or what happens if I get ignored again? Masierra2008 (talk) 19:06, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I mean. I can't just stay blocked forever. And besides, I've just said sorry to @331dot and @Yamla. Masierra2008 (talk) 19:11, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you ping me or Yamla again, your ability to edit this page will be removed. Yamla may even do so on their own, I don't speak for them. 331dot (talk) 19:13, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What does "ping" even mean? Masierra2008 (talk) 19:15, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I said I'm sorry! Masierra2008 (talk) 19:16, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just unblock me! 😤 Masierra2008 (talk) 19:19, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Someone help me! Masierra2008 (talk) 19:20, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I just want to be editing on Wikipedia again! Masierra2008 (talk) 19:20, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stop. Stop writing posts, go find something else to do. A volunteer admin will eventually review your request. Do not post again unless in response to an inquiry. 331dot (talk) 19:21, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's so weird, how you don't use exclamation points, but okay. I'm done! I'm OUTTA HERE!! 😤😡 Masierra2008 (talk) 19:22, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. @PhilKnight. I have too many accounts. Masierra1, Mateo, @Masierra2008, and Msiecloud. That's how so many accounts I can think of. Masierra2008 (talk) 15:09, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What I wanted to make is an article about a production company that has been founded by someone else and there was no such page. @PhilKnight. Masierra2008 (talk) 15:52, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Don't edit prior declined requests. You may make a new request. I would suggest that you click "edit" and not "reply" to make it. 331dot (talk) 15:24, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Get out of here, @331dot! Masierra2008 (talk) 15:46, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No you! You blocked me indefinitely, so now you're going to pay with another new account! Masierra2008 (talk) 15:47, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I said it once! I said it twice! It's your fault! I can't blame anyone else other than you or me! That's it! Masierra2008 (talk) 15:51, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My apology!

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Masierra2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

But I always want to edit on Wikipedia, all I was doing was submitting Draft:Medusa Film so one of you could submit it.

Decline reason:

This doesn't even begin to inducate that you understand the reasons for the block and won't do the same things again. JBW (talk) 15:58, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@DoubleGrazing, @331dot, @Theroadislong, @KylieTastic, I am sorry and really sorry again for all the yelling, but I just wish that I didn't cause all this. I just need the opportunity to make this clear. Masierra2008 (talk) 16:02, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the yelling, @331dot. You are an admin. I know what you're saying. Masierra2008 (talk) 16:03, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Don't ping me.

And may I suggest nixing this user's TPA, as things are clearly out of control. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:19, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean "ping"? Masierra2008 (talk) 21:11, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ping like ping pong? Masierra2008 (talk) 21:12, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am super confused. That is mentioning you, not pinging you. Masierra2008 (talk) 21:15, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want me to stop mentioning you, that's fine with me. Masierra2008 (talk) 21:20, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can stop mentioning me too, time for talk page access to be revoked, we are being trolled here. Theroadislong (talk) 21:30, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. I was resisting it as they told me to stay away, but..... 331dot (talk) 21:39, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Medusa Film article publish?

Even though I'm blocked, can you still publish the article though? Masierra2008 (talk) 21:14, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

When will my block expire?

I'm not saying you're evil, but I want to say this through. When can I possibly get unblocked? Masierra2008 (talk) 21:21, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the posting of this notice.

331dot (talk) 21:29, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS

UTRS appeal #94133 & UTRS appeal #95433 have been declined. JBW (talk) 16:02, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

... and so has UTRS appeal #95537. JBW (talk) 23:07, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]