User talk:Martin Petherbridge

After almost four months of editing, an ordinary welcome tag feels out of place. So here is a very informal welcome from me to you! Lova Falk talk 09:04, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Susanna Jones

The article Susanna Jones has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Eeekster (talk) 22:20, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Valerio Varesi

The article Valerio Varesi has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Nat Gertler (talk) 03:27, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Goldfinch (novel)

Hi Martin Petherbridge!

I was reviewing your page about The Goldfinch (novel) and I added some tags to it. Please do not be alarmed by the number of tags since most of them are easily dealt with (e.g. adding links from other articles to your page and vice versa). However, there is a chance that someone will nominate it for deletion because it does not really give an indication of why the book is important and does not have references to establish notability. Please find reliable references and prove it's notability. I would hate to see your page get deleted. Good luck!

Sosthenes12 (talk) 23:34, 26 March 2013 (UTC)Sosthenes12[reply]

I came across this while stub-sorting, started off by adding the ISBN and was about to add a link to a newspaper source about it ... then realised that the article section has much more information about it, so made this into a redirect to that. Eventually, of course, there will be an article, and I've also added it to the disambiguation page at Goldfinch. Incidentally this didn't need to have the disambiguator "(novel)" as there's nothing else in the encyclopedia with the title "The Goldfinch", so I'd moved it before turning it into a redirect. See also Wikipedia:Notability_(books)#Not_yet_published_books.

There's a lot to learn about editing Wikipedia, but it's an interesting journey. Happy Editing! PamD 10:06, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Martin Beck Award, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peter Robinson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:05, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tom Franklin (author)

The article Tom Franklin (author) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Gbawden (talk) 12:56, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tom Franklins

Hallo, As you moved the poker player from the base name to Tom Franklin (poker player) and then created a dab page at Tom Franklin, it's your responsibility to clean up all the incoming links to him which are now pointing to the dab page. This is explained in the message on the screen when you are doing the page move. Please sort this out. Thanks. PamD 23:18, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've merged the two dab pages, but the same still applies: you need to correct the links which used to point to the poker player so that they still point directly to him. Thanks. PamD 23:29, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've now found a navbox template {{1990s WSOP Bracelet Winners}} which seems to account for the vast majority of the links, and edited it - so you only need to mop up any remaining incoming links once the template change has worked through the system. PamD 23:29, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No thank you.

In that case please do not ever again move a page away from the base name and create a disambiguation page at that name, as you are disrupting the encyclopedia by doing so if you do not follow up by fixing the incoming links. When you move the page a message appears on screen explaining that this is your responsibility. I've fixed the remaining few incoming links to Tom Franklin now. PamD 07:06, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No thank you. I don't subscribe to these rules.

Rennie Airth

Hi. Regarding this addition, I was wondering if you have a source. I can't find anything online so I've tagged it, but it occurs to me you might have seen something in a trade publication or something. Rivertorch (talk) 15:14, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Peter May (writer) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

* Entry Island (Quercus) 2014)

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:36, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pierre Lemaitre

The article Pierre Lemaitre has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article. The nominator also raised the following concern:

All biographies of living people created after March 18, 2010, must have references.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. PK T(alk) 12:58, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Pierre Lemaitre

Hello Martin Petherbridge,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Pierre Lemaitre for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Sourov0000 (talk) 22:35, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding future titles

Titles which have not yet appeared must have a reference (a source) in order to be verifiable; you can't just add to a list if they don't exist already. Please provide a verifiable reference for this information before adding it back. Icarus of old (talk) 20:30, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No. I shall continue to add the information. If you want it to be verified so badly, search for it, it's very easily locatable however I am neither a pedant nor jobsworth and refuse to get drawn into a kafkaesque enterprise where i have to prove the existence of facts i know to be true. that's my prerogative. yours is to remove them if you want them to be verified, however your position is a much more philosophically ludicrous one which I leave to you and your selfesteem to look after. and there is no point responding to me i have been doing this for years. if blocked i will sign up again under a different name and carry on.

That's not how Wikipedia works. Read this if you have any questions; it clearly states that the "burden of evidence lies with the editor who adds or restores material." I will get an admin involved if you revert again. All best. Icarus of old (talk) 23:00, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

that's fine by me.

Disambiguation link notification for February 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited So Long, See You Tomorrow (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Maxwell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You appear to be engaged in an edit war

This edit summary shows that you intend to pursue an edit war regarding edits you wish to make to Minette Walters. Since the changes are opposed, you will need to engage in discussion on the talk page to reach some kind of consensus on how the article should read. Bear in mind that that three revert rule is a bright line guideline for when an edit war becomes disruptive, yet an editor can be blocked for edit warring even if they don't hit three reverts within 24 hours. —C.Fred (talk) 21:01, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DRN case closed

Hello, I am MrScorch6200, a volunteer at the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard. You recently filed a request or were a major party in the DRN case titled "Minette Walters". Unfortunately, the case was closed regardless because there was no talk page discussion as required by the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard. When these issues have been addressed, you may refile the DRN request or open a thread on another noticeboard as appropriate. If you have any questions please contact me on my talk page or at the DRN talk page. Thank you! --MrScorch6200 (talk | ctrb) 21:30, 1 August 2014 (UTC) This message has been sent as a courtesy using a standardized template.[reply]

Additional comments by volunteer: The other editor raised the issue on the article's talk page three days ago. Please discuss the issue there.

August 2014

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Minette Walters, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. MarnetteD|Talk 19:26, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Minette Walters. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. MarnetteD|Talk 15:29, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

BTW what ever happened to the book A Dreadful Murder that you were adding a couple years ago?

It was published.

Then what was your "she hasn't written in seven years about? MarnetteD|Talk 15:46, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"she hasn't written a novel in seven years" - A Dreadful Murder is a novella.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Minette Walters. MarnetteD|Talk 15:46, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Brent Rivera

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Brent Rivera, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. (See section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GILO A&E⇑ 13:06, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of winners and shortlisted authors of the Booker Prize for Fiction, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amanda Foreman. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Martin Petherbridge. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ragnar Jónasson

Hello, Martin Petherbridge. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Ragnar Jónasson, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Ragnar Jónasson to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, Mike1901 (talk) 15:39, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Minette Walters, without citing a reliable source using an inline citation that clearly supports the material. The burden is on the person wishing to keep in the material to meet these requirements, as a necessary (but not always sufficient) condition. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. MarnetteD|Talk 15:05, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Minette Walters. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. MarnetteD|Talk 19:11, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Thomas Enger

The article Thomas Enger has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Whispe ring 20:55, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Martin Petherbridge. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of I’ll Be Your Girl

The article I’ll Be Your Girl has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of musical notability. No references.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:55, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of I’ll Be Your Girl for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article I’ll Be Your Girl is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I’ll Be Your Girl until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:39, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Martin Petherbridge. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2019 World Snooker Championship

Hello. This is a message to let you know that we are trying to discourage the practice of adding live updates to the match scores for snooker tournaments, per WP:LIVESCORES which clearly states "The current consensus is to not add visible match or frame scores to an article until the match is completed." Please note this discussion on the matter. Thank you. Rodney Baggins (talk) 22:07, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at The Death of Jesus (book), you may be blocked from editing. Stop continuing to edit war for this article. Per WP:BRD: you edited, you were reverted. The next step is to discuss, which you can do at Talk:The Death of Jesus (book) or here and you can ping all of the editors who have reverted you in the last few days. If you continue to edit war and not communicate, you will be reported to WP:ANEW. I'm offering you a chance to talk about this. Please take it. Red Phoenix ^talk 20:05, 2 January 2020 (UTC) Red Phoenix ^talk 20:05, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Martin_Petherbridge reported by User:Red Phoenix (Result: ). Thank you. Red Phoenix ^talk 19:11, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Putin vandalism

Hi Martin,

You've been on WP longer than I have, and I'm not going to template a regular. However, your recent edits to Vladimir Putin's page were vandalism. They've been reverted.

Thanks. Amccann421 (talk) 20:31, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You're damn right they were. Martin Petherbridge (talk) 20:36, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Javier Marías

On 13 September 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Javier Marías, which you have recently edited. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 12:48, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Walter Satterthwait moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Walter Satterthwait, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. echidnaLives - talk - edits 09:16, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Walter Satterthwait (November 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ingenuity was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I noticed you set the short description to I've got no intention of making the article satisfy your standards. Someone else can do that. We cannot accept an article that is completely unreferenced.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Walter Satterthwait and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 13:22, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Martin Petherbridge! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 13:22, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:10, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Walter Satterthwait

Hello, Martin Petherbridge

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Rsjaffe, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Walter Satterthwait, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. To prevent the deletion, please add a reference to the article. You may remove the deletion tag yourself once the article has at least one reliable source.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rsjaffe}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

— rsjaffe 🗣️ 23:55, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Walter Satterthwait moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Walter Satterthwait, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:30, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Walter Satterthwait 2 (January 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs external news sources that cover Walter's career. This is just a list of works as it stands.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Walter Satterthwait 2 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 20:04, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Walter Satterthwait

Hello, Martin Petherbridge. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Walter Satterthwait, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Walter Satterthwait

Hello, Martin Petherbridge. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Walter Satterthwait".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:25, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

Hello, I'm Gaia Octavia Agrippa. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Charlotte Owen, Baroness Owen of Alderley Edge, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Gaia Octavia Agrippa ^Talk 15:41, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CRYSTALBALL

Hello, please do not add books that have not yet been published to writer's biographies without adding a verifiable reliable source to confirm the book and publishing date. And please do read our policy on "What Wikipedia is not" - specifically the section Wikipedia is not a crystal ball WP:CRYSTALBALL for more information. In a nutshell this policy states: Individual scheduled or expected future events should be included only if the event is notable and almost certain to take place. Dates are not definite until the event actually takes place, as even otherwise-notable events can be cancelled or postponed at the last minute by a major incident. and Wikipedia is not a collection of product announcements. I have noticed that you have done this on multiple writer's articles. I've removed the one that was added to Robert MacFarlane (one of my favorite writers by the way), however I don't have the time to clean up the other other instances where future-events/publications that were added by you. Could you please take the time to revert your own edits? Thank you in advance, your compliance would be much appreciated. Netherzone (talk) 19:59, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

Hello Martin Petherbridge. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Robert MacFarlane (writer), gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Martin Petherbridge. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Martin Petherbridge|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. You continue to add unsourced content to articles to promote books that have not yet been published. Please disclose your connection. Netherzone (talk) 02:33, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Songs of a Lost World moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Songs of a Lost World. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. — MaxnaCarta ( 💬 • 📝 ) 09:21, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]