User talk:Margaret Readdy

Margaret Readdy, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Margaret Readdy! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. We hope to see you there!

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot (talk) 04:34, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Margaret Readdy, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions. To get the most out of Wikipedia, you may benefit from following some of the links below.

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or

or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field.

Happy editing! --Snowysusan (talk) 09:07, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Louis Billera.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Arshad.mohammed18 (talk) 09:14, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Louis Billera, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 23:03, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Richard Ehrenborg

Hello, Margaret Readdy. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Richard Ehrenborg".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 07:39, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Henry Clay High School, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. If content is reverted for cause, do not just replace it. Take it to the article talk page and attempt to gain consensus for it, fix the noted issues or drop it. Wikipedia school articles are not in any way for the school they are about. They exist to summarize what has been written about the school in reliable independent sources. Period. John from Idegon (talk) 01:46, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Hobart High School (Indiana), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Your statement in your edits summary smacks of WP:RIGHTGREATWRONGS. The simple fact is that in the US, sports gets coverage. The student council doesn't. Your choice of articles seems more than a bit POINTy and borderline harrassing. You may want to rethink your plan here. If you somehow believe covering mundane things like the honor society fits within encyclopedic goals, start a discussion at WT:WPSCH. I'd suggest you not follow me around though. See WP:HARASS John from Idegon (talk) 05:51, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Richard Ehrenborg (March 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hasteur was:

Notability seems proven (Named Chair), however all the references come from the University of Kentucky, the subject's employer so I can't in good conscience accept this without some independent sources attesting to the subject's notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Richard Ehrenborg and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Richard Ehrenborg, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hasteur (talk) 04:37, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Richard Ehrenborg has been accepted

Richard Ehrenborg, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 19:03, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]