User talk:Conam-san

M4V3R1CK32 (talk) 01:48, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Conam-san! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! M4V3R1CK32 (talk) 01:48, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Indonesia women's national under-20 football team results

Hello, Conam-san. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Indonesia women's national under-20 football team results, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:07, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Indonesia women's national under-20 football team results (June 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JalenFolf was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This is a procedural decline with the same reasons as before as this draft was submitted without visual improvement. Please make sure the concerns from the last decline are resolved before resubmitting.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Indonesia women's national under-20 football team results and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jalen Folf (Bark[s]) 04:31, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Lévy Madinda. Giant Snowman 15:36, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Maarten Paes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kediri. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:52, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Zahaby Gholy

Hello Conam-san, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Zahaby Gholy, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zahaby Gholy.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Anwegmann}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Anwegmann (talk) 23:46, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for repeated addition of unsourced content, despite multiple warnings. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Giant Snowman 17:38, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Conam-san (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am fully understand the importance of adhering to Wikipedia's guidelines regarding the verifiability for the need of reliable sources. I have no intention to never provide information without the source nor even dare providing a fake information. ::If you saw my edit history, I've plenty of times provided an actual sources. Although I'm not sure which exact parts that have no sources, it might be the football team coach name or their managerial clubs updates. Usually I often edit these football coaches of certain clubs or national teams name, because it is the most updated one, before I editted it, it was already unsourced to begin with. Because the football federation also tends to not have an updated news within their website or social media. ::Regardless I've learned from my mistake, and will obey the Wikipedia's content policies. In the future if i do make another unintentional mistake like without source, do please just undo my edit instead. As I've always tried my best to contribute the most up-to-date and an accurate helpful information (with the source of course). So I will be pay more attention veryfying the content next time before submitting it. @GiantSnowman: 15:50, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline as this block has expired.Ponyo^{bons mots} 16:12, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Mierza Firjatullah moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Mierza Firjatullah. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it is promotional and reads like an advertisement. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 02:46, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Matthew Baker (soccer, born 2009) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Matthew Baker (soccer, born 2009). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 02:52, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Transfermarkt

Since much of its content is user-edited, Transfermarkt is not considered a reliable source. Please do not cite the website in articles. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 02:29, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tajikistan national under-17 football team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bishan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:52, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]