User talk:Mambo420

Welcome!

Hello, Mambo420, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Polytechnic Institute of New York University

Thanks for all your contributions to this article and the other NYU pages. I did notice that you moved the Polytechnic Institute of New York University to a different name. The article name should always be the full official name of the subject and your move changed that. I moved the page back; if you disagree please discuss it on the article talk page. Thanks! --Mblumber (talk) 01:40, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Citation Barnstar
	Thanks for all your hard work cleaning up the alumni on Polytechnic Institute of New York University. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 07:07, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mambo420 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have restlessly made constructive edits and received award/barnstar from an administrator for my hard work. I have received applaud from other editors. I have flawless history. I am a WP:MEAT, who engaged in meatpuppetry unwittingly, on the assumption that it is an acceptable practice.

Decline reason:

That's not a good reason for unblocking. Looks to me like a case of WP:DUCK with socks. Peridon (talk) 19:06, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mambo420 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I never engaged in disruptive editing. Is there any way that I can get unblocked?

Decline reason:

Per comment below — Daniel Case (talk) 16:11, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

By its very definition WP:MEAT is disruptive editing ... care to rephrase? (✉→BWilkins←✎) 10:29, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mambo420 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock me. I made over 450 constructive edits and 0 destructive edits. If you ever see me doing unconstructive editing then block me forever. I won't say a word. The real sockpuppet was my former girlfriend who is still editing Wiki under new names(one of which was bimbo420).

Decline reason:

you are a proven sockpuppet, and will not be unblocked under any circumstance.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 22:45, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mambo420 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been blocked wrongfully. Someone please review my case again.... maybe the admin who gave me the barnstar above--Mambo420 (talk) 23:53, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Looks very plausible behaviorially. To prevent you from wasting more of our time, talk page access revoked. Max Semenik (talk) 09:28, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

My block has no expiry set This is beyond ridiculousness--Mambo420 (talk) 00:11, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I have restored your previous declined unblock requests, which you must not remove while still blocked. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 00:03, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You will not be able to contest a Checkuser result that comes back as Confirmed, Likely, or a result that has the effect of being either of the two. Go away, Mango. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 00:12, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please try to understand that I use the University's computer. Many people use that computer. I made over 500 constructive edits, how can I be a disruptive editor? Besides, if I really wanted to create socks, then why would I even care to get this account unblocked... People just don't understand--Mambo420 (talk) 00:26, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am looking for a happy ending to this misunderstanding--Mambo420 (talk) 00:48, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]