User talk:Makewaluigigreatagain

November 2018

Hello, I'm Tornado chaser. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Spirit: Stallion of the Cimarron, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Tornado chaser (talk) 14:12, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Makewaluigigreatagain, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Makewaluigigreatagain! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GreenMeansGo (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

December 2018

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Spirit: Stallion of the Cimarron, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 09:17, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Spirit: Stallion of the Cimarron. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. bonadea contributions talk 19:45, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Spirit: Stallion of the Cimarron. bonadea contributions talk 09:29, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have said that you just want to make other fans happy - that's nice, but it doesn't change the fact that you need to tell people where you found the information about the sequel. --bonadea contributions talk 07:00, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Spirit: Stallion of the Cimarron 2

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Spirit: Stallion of the Cimarron 2 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Daiyusha (talk) 07:20, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

You have been blocked for one month from editing for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Your behavior on Bob Avakian was reprehensible. Never do anything like that again. Cullen328 (talk) 00:20, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at [[1]]. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. this comment is not conducive to the COVID 19 pandemic/talk page Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 00:10, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Kinu ^t/_c 00:10, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Given your only edit since your previous block expired, I don't think you're here to contribute constructively anymore. --Kinu ^t/_c 00:11, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]