User talk:Magnatyrannus/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

→

Archive 5

Drmies

@Drmies: Out of curiosity, why are you reverting my sock edits? Those edits were valid. If you need an explanation, here it is - on Protheosodon I was trying to make an inline reference, and on Neodolodus I was trying to add more categories and on the Honda Group, Colombia I was trying to change Olisanophus sanalfonensis to Mesolicaphrium sanalfonense and move Pericotoxodon from the Litoptern section to the Notoungulate section. Please reply and re-revert those problematic reverts. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 14:47, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

• Well, you're blocked for socking, so I really don't have to explain anything to you, but I will: if you have to explain your edits here, in hindsight, then maybe next time you will do it in the edit summary. We all need everyone to explain their edits when they are making them. Drmies (talk) 14:59, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

  Don't worry about any of that now, Larrayal has decided to kindly revert them once my block expires. Also, I apologize if I accidentally offended you. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 02:29, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

About Priosphenodon and Kaikaifilusaurus

Priosphenodon is proposed as a synonym of Kaikaifilusaurus in the description of Patagosphenos, but interestingly that 99% of the subsequent papers and studies continues using the name Priosphenodon avelasi rather than Kaikaifilusaurus calvoi, so it seems not to be a scientific consensus or a direct support. But the merge tag of Priosphenodon is proposed, we usually do formal merging if it was a scientific consensus.

Both taxa were named at the same year, but what I found at Twitter says Kaikaifilusaurus' paper is published months ago before the Priosphenodon paper published. I cannot get the paper of Kaikaifilusaurus but the paper of Priosphenodon is available on Researchgate.

99% of the papers after Patagosphenos uses the name Priosphenodon rather than Kaikaifilusaurus, so for me the synonymy of Priosphenodon seems not to be a scientific consensus. But not too long ago, someone already put the merge tag of the two pages, I've removed the tags because it seems not to be a scientific consensus (at least in my view). Huinculsaurus (talk) 06:26, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

I agree. Until there are more papers discussing the synonymy between Priosphenodon and Kaikaifilusaurus, these taxa shall remain separate. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 16:29, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Also, I apologize about the way I was acting to you on December. I am very sorry for what I've done back then. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 03:57, 18 August 2022 (UTC)