User talk:TCMagic87

June 2008

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to African American, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 17:40, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Georgia Central.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Georgia Central.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:13, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your edits to September 11, 2001 attacks, Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. RxS (talk) 02:50, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's not legitimate, you inserted a (at best) fringe theory into the lead of an article that's under an Arbcom case [1]. If you feel more content needs to be added please use the talk page. Not only that, you implied certain politicians are guilty of mass murder. There's no legitimate debate among reliable sources that the Bush administration planned the attacks. Your opinion that the constant blaming of Al-Queda for the attacks is nonsense does not constitute a justification for that edit. RxS (talk) 04:01, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Evolution. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dawn Bard (talk) 18:33, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Evolution, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This article deals with the verifiable view of evolution in reliable sources on the topic. Tim Vickers (talk) 18:57, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Barack Obama

Please look at an article's talk page for previous discussion and consensus before making a controversial edit as you did. That's the way it's done on Wikipedia, not to mention common courtesy. Read WP:BLP and WP:CON. Thank you. Ward3001 (talk) 21:11, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Barack Obama, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Newguy34 (talk) 06:24, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Core policies

Content must be

User conduct must

Edits in general should

This list should be enough to keep you out of trouble. Regards, SHEFFIELDSTEEL^TALK 21:14, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Bad boy buggie.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Bad boy buggie.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Hekerui (talk) 12:53, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010

This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as .SILK.-Nedd-, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 01:11, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox tractor

Template:Infobox tractor has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:10, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merging of Template:Infobox tractor

Template:Infobox tractor has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox automobile. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:38, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]