User talk:Matthew Sanders 73

Welcome!

Hello, Magic Lantern Art, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! —Paleo Neonate – 07:56, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

Welcome to Wikipedia. I saw that you edited or created Draft:Magic Lantern, and I noticed that your username, "Magic Lantern Art", may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Foobar Museum of Art". However, you are permitted to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you personally, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87".

Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people, and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, or website, regardless of your username. Please also read our paid editing policy and our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please request a change of username, by completing this form, choosing a username that complies with our username policy. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. —Paleo Neonate – 07:56, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Magic Lantern

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Magic Lantern, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. — fortunavelut luna 09:38, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment

First the easy bit. It's possible that Caorongjin may not have noticed your connected contributor notice on your user page, you should put it on the draft's talk page too. Editors will be aware that you can edit with a COI as long as it is declared, but Caorongjin may not have looked at your user page.

What Ammarpad has to say is more important than my comments, but I've removed an (unnecessary) use of Wikipedia as a ref. For the first Charity Commission link, you would do better to link to the financial and documents pages rather than the overview. Organisation annual reports and similar are usually acceptable as sources for financial info since it's really the only source for that, and other sources would have to refer back to it anyway. For your patrons, Vaughan would be better to have a ref other than your own website. I'm not sure what wrong with Mayhew's ref. Although his biography is likely to be written by him, I'm not clear why the reviewer is challenging his seeming uncontroversial claim to be a patron, you will have to ask Ammarpad.

I think that a small charity is always going to struggle a bit to find really good refs, Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:19, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much again for your invaluable help. I will make those changes and see if Will Vaughan can add something to his external site. I'm expecting an independent article in another newspaper later this year so that might also help. I will keep trying till it's right! Matthew Sanders 73 (talk) 08:49, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

- sorry, another question: does a mention on Mumsnet count as a reliable source? https://www.mumsnet.com/things-to-do/introducing-children-art-galleries. Thanks for your advice. Matthew Sanders 73 (talk) 09:04, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't use it, it's a blog, we don't know who posted it, and it's not mentions you need, it's facts about the organisation. If a named art critic talked about you, that might be OK, but an anonymous posting on mumsnet has no value as a source. Incidentally, if you want to be sure that I see replies like the above, link to my user name as I have done with you reviewers above, and make sure you sign the message Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:10, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Jimfbleak, got it, all makes sense. I thought as the Mumsnet page is Mumsnet editorial generated by them as opposed to someone posting on the site it would be ok but I totally take your point. I'll keep on till it's right... Matthew Sanders 73 (talk) 17:30, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Magic Lantern (charity) has been accepted

Magic Lantern (charity), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Ammarpad (talk) 16:55, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Ammarpad: Great news... thank you again for all your time and considered advice, it's greatly appreciated. I will endeavour to improve that article as best I can. Matthew Sanders 73 (talk) 09:16, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]