User talk:MWACHTENDONK

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

MWACHTENDONK (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

67.87.225.29 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Putmedown". The reason given for Putmedown's block is: "disruptive sock".

Blocking administrator: AuburnPilot (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: Sockpuppeting, eh? — Kurykh 00:21, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MWACHTENDONK (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i have never heard of Putmedown a i do not like being called a liar and this is unreasonable without evidence i just logged on and found out i was autoblocked so i used the template and became blocked indefinatly i am sorry for any problems but if this is an ip address problem u should know i use my neighbors wireless network

Decline reason:

Hard to believe considering your first edit was on a RFA nominated by Putmedown.[1] Although theft of service is another original excuse for unblocking — CitiCat^♫ 02:31, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MWACHTENDONK (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i should have the right to support an adminship nomination if i want the user to be an admin and not be accused of sockpuppetry because of it i do not think it is reasonable to block me indefinatly for trying to be unblocked please show me proof of your claims of sockpuppetry and i do not believe using the same ip address as putmedown makes me a sock

Decline reason:

All currently available evidence indicates that you're very likely a sockpuppet. Sorry. – Luna Santin (talk) 01:36, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

fine i am a sock but not of Putmedown to hell with the fucking wikipedia i guess i will go back to vandalizing wikiquote