Main activity here 64 — 71 caption links a recap clip
Man is evolving to a being qua intellect but most of them have not reached the developmental milestone of overcoming culturally predetermined irrationality. The vast majority still has a level of thinking that accepts a faith, mysticism, or revelation based fundament and rejects finding out as a basis, fail to know they need to try for what post-critcality tries to reach, or asserts none at all like a mere animal with cognition. But this milestone is overdue and imminent, a sudden end to the havoc an immature animal with powerful cognitive abilities wreaks and epoch of an intelligent lifeform per se.
"The criticism of religion is the prerequisite of all criticism." - Marx[1]
Such an overwhelming and egregious wrong, requiring nothing more than a successful moment of self examination, is I believe, bound to be made right sooner rather than later.[2]. An analogy to the toddler that doesn't yet understand the image in the mirror is herself is more or less cogent.[3] Being aware of reality is definitional for intelligent life, a destination of evolution to it, and the right of all, the current tragic situation of a majority of backward individuals and groups at scale notwithstanding.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Regarding this revert, made without an edit summary: you reverted fixes that eliminated two syntax errors on your User page. Do you have a plan to fix those errors yourself? If not, I or some other gnome will eventually come along and repeat the edit. Do you need help understanding why I applied those routine fixes to your user page? – Jonesey95 (talk) 23:23, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Do you need help reading and understanding English? If you persist in vandalizing my user pages I will take it to arbitration. Also are you blind? Can't you see the parameter these edits were trynna add were already there? Lycurgus (talk) 20:09, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please assume good faith, as I did above, and refrain from personal attacks. The thumb option was already present in the relevant File: call, which caused your page to appear on the Linter error list (see the Lint errors section of Page information for your User page), so I removed the extra, non-working option. I also removed a stray closing </center> tag that was not matched with an opening tag. Your revert restored those two errors to the page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 23:24, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I don't see a problem but please stop. Editing other ppls usr pages is creepy, like picking somebody else's boogers oder. I'm not active in main space and not ready for this yet on a personal basis, if the bot doesn error which I'm unclear if it did or not, is OK igess. I removed the stray center after the revert. Lycurgus (talk) 08:51, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
In terms of the Big 5 I have a strong streak of Neuroticism, but Openness is dominant so ima redact the above and trust that the automation will prevent vandalism and bot runners will be expressing the conscientiousness trait. I'm OK with constructive edits. Lycurgus (talk) 06:29, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .
Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.
