User talk:Lostangeles4
I'm not trying to sabotage your article
[edit]I'm trying to make it better to conform to wikipedia reliable source standards. Wikipedia has article standards and guidelines. Also, please stop removing the COI tag or areas to improve tags until they have been indeed improved. Lastly, blogspot is also not an acceptable reliable source. The subject seems fine based on a google search, but the way the article is currently written has problems with sourcing, and others. The tags I added were there to help you understand what needed to be improved. ηoian ‡orever ηew ‡rontiers 08:38, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
I understand .. i'm new out of college … this is my first article .. my 2015 dates were set there just to hold place while i found the most credible information . but i assure you the subject and the information are all correct. i understand what you're saying about blogspot .. and thank you for acknowledging that Kent Hadley was indeed a 1960 Yankee and also Nicky's grandfather please just help me instead of deleting the page immediately
- 1) A quick tip: use four ~ characters after you post on talk pages to sign your signature. Like so ηoian ‡orever ηew ‡rontiers 08:53, 13 February 2015 (UTC) (it will be replaced with your signature). This is considered good practice on wikipedia. 2) If you cannot find reliable sources for certain information, it may be better to leave out the information, or leave a ref-improve tag. 3) In the future, I would recommend creating an article in a sandbox or draft space first, fleshing it out a bit, then creating the article itself. Otherwise, you will get CSD and PROD tags from people who patrol the recently created articles list. Alternatively, use the under-construction template to avoid problems. ηoian ‡orever ηew ‡rontiers 08:53, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
- Oh, and yes I understand wikipedia policies take time to understand at first. You may want to use the template help-me on your own talk page in the future if you have questions and an editor will come along to help answer it. (PPS: Templates are written by surrounding the template name with two of each bracket (the characters in the quotes: '{' '}')ηoian ‡orever ηew ‡rontiers 08:55, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
- Just a quick note for you as well: you should take a look at the notability guidelines for musicians; it details what the musician should accomplish in order to have an article. It looks like a long list, but the musician needs to meet at least one (it's best to have multiple) of those criteria, with reliable sources of course. Another thing to know, notability is NOT inherited. This means that even though T. Mills remixed some of your subject's songs, it does not mean that your subject immediately becomes notable. I'll be keeping an eye on your page as you progress, but for now, it doesn't look like your subject meets the current criteria for an article. Go ahead and prove me wrong with your edits! :) Tek022 | Comments? 09:04, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
- Forums are also not considered reliable sources most of the time. I think you need to take a look at the definition of reliable sources ηoian ‡orever ηew ‡rontiers 09:17, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
- Just a quick note for you as well: you should take a look at the notability guidelines for musicians; it details what the musician should accomplish in order to have an article. It looks like a long list, but the musician needs to meet at least one (it's best to have multiple) of those criteria, with reliable sources of course. Another thing to know, notability is NOT inherited. This means that even though T. Mills remixed some of your subject's songs, it does not mean that your subject immediately becomes notable. I'll be keeping an eye on your page as you progress, but for now, it doesn't look like your subject meets the current criteria for an article. Go ahead and prove me wrong with your edits! :) Tek022 | Comments? 09:04, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
- Oh, and yes I understand wikipedia policies take time to understand at first. You may want to use the template help-me on your own talk page in the future if you have questions and an editor will come along to help answer it. (PPS: Templates are written by surrounding the template name with two of each bracket (the characters in the quotes: '{' '}')ηoian ‡orever ηew ‡rontiers 08:55, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
Nicky was known as the King of Kick Drums in his hometown .. http://www.hotnewhiphop.com/t-mills-kocaine-kisses-song.901538.html < here's a link to prove that he produced this song for T. Mills .. the same artist linked to the article. I'm not sure who you guys are personally .. but you can search "Nicholas Ingram" "Nicky Finest" or "Kent Hadley" and find plenty of links for him .. he's one of the most talented musicians on the rise out of Boise .. i was writing this article as a birthday present for him. We are all really proud of his most recent accomplishment of producing a song with a notable artist "OnCue." The song is called "View From Here" and famous rap producer "Just Blaze" co-produced the record with Nicky Finest
If you guys can please help me link some stuff and make the article completely legitimate and not up for deletion that would REALLY help me out
my search terms are "Nicholas Ingram Boise" "Nicky Finest" "Oncue - This View From Here" .. if you see these things you will realize he is on the rise and deserves to have his accomplishments documented just like his grandfather has. His instagram is " @Nicky_Finest " he has been designing original jewelry and traveling the west coast as you can see from the photos. He's gotten jewelry on a lot of social media famous people down in LA and he will continue to try and work with blogs and others that can create legitimate articles about his story as it unfolds.
PLEASE HELP !
Speedy deletion nomination of Nicky Finest
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Nicky Finest requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jytdog (talk) 11:43, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
[edit]This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. Jytdog (talk) 11:49, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
COI warning
[edit]Hello, Lostangeles4. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.
All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.
If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:
- Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
- Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
- Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.
Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Jytdog (talk) 11:49, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
Lostangeles4, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]Hi Lostangeles4! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! ChamithN (I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:11, 13 February 2015 (UTC) |