User talk:LoreleiCampbell
This is LoreleiCampbell's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Raine Study (September 18)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Raine Study and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello! LoreleiCampbell,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 08:37, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Raine Study (October 11)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Raine Study and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Welcome!
[edit]
|
Declare any connection
[edit] Hello LoreleiCampbell. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to Draft:Raine Study, and that you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:LoreleiCampbell. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=LoreleiCampbell|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}
. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. --Worldbruce (talk) 04:13, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi Bruce, I am employed part-time with the Raine Study, so yes you are correct. I need to declare that. The Raine Study however is definitely a worthy wikipedia listing and would not have done this otherwise. I had thought I had posted it as a potential article for creation, not submitted directly so will review what I have done. Thank you though for pointing that out.
This user, in accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, discloses that they have been paid by ACME for their contributions to Wikipedia. |
How can I suggest an article for creation?
[edit]Hoping someone can help me by telling me how I can suggest an article for creation like the following: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Raine_Study
Your submission at Articles for creation: Raine Study has been accepted
[edit]The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Kerry (talk) 22:04, 26 December 2017 (UTC)