User talk:Lmsmartins

Hello, Lmsmartins. You have new messages at Wuhwuzdat's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

GlobeStar Systems

A tag has been placed on GlobeStar Systems, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of GlobeStar Systems and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Wuhwuzdat (talk) 19:48, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of GlobeStar Systems

A tag has been placed on GlobeStar Systems, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

2nd verse, same as the first (recently deleted and user reincarnated page), still reads as SPAM to me, just like it did a few minutes ago

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Wuhwuzdat (talk) 20:30, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reply about GlobeStar

The article was repeatedly removed because it reads like it was written as an advertisement. What is your connection to the company? AKRadecki^Speaketh 20:31, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am a student and im taking a formation course about the software this company is using. I loved it and I think this company diserves a reference on wikipedia. I will try to change the article. I did the article based on IBM Microsoft and Cisco's articles. My apologies if it looks like an advertisement to you. I will change it. Is there any possibility for you to see the changed article before i post it? or can I post it?

Thank you.

Speedy deletion of GlobeStar Systems

A tag has been placed on GlobeStar Systems, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

SPAM is still SPAM, no matter how many cans of it you open....(3rd incarnation of this same SPAM page today)

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Wuhwuzdat (talk) 20:51, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I changed the article. It is not the same. Please review it. It has NOTHING of advertisement. Please review it. Please can you tell me what you think in the NEW article is advertisement? really. please.

Solution

You were warned repeatedly. I was about to block you, but decided to give you the benefit of the doubt, since you're a student and new to wikipedia. Rather than block you, I suggest you work on the article in your sandbox. When you have it ready, let me take a look at it. Please keep in mind that you have to demonstrate notability as we define it, and your article has to be referenced with multiple 3rd party reliable sources. AKRadecki^Speaketh 21:00, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi.

Thank you very much for your oportunity. I am sorry for the article being an advertisement. I will change it and then I will let you know when it is finished so you can take a look at it.

I am trying to enter my sandbox page but it says i am blocked. Can you please unblock it so I can change my article there?

Thank you very much for your support.

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Autoblock #1293742 lifted or expired.

Request handled by: AKRadecki^Speaketh 14:24, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Akradecki!

I changed the article and included all the books, websites and journals i used in my research and joined all them in the "References" heading like you asked me to do so. I am also going to post 2 pictures but i still have to wait 2 days to have the permission to do it.

Please take a look at it and tell me if it's good. Please feel free to give me any suggestions to the article.

Thank you very much.

Lmsmartins (talk) 13:51, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi LMS...it looks much better than it did! Great job on your first Wikipedia article. I hope you won't stop with this one, as there are so many that are still needed. I made a couple of tweaks that I wanted to let you know about. First, I removed the thumb sizing from the image. That's because the system is set up so that people can set user preferences for how big they want images in articles to show up, and hard-coding a pixel size overrides that. Secondly, I removed the bolding on some of the words in the body of the article. Typically, only the subject in the lead paragraph gets bolded. If there is another title that redirects to this article, sometimes that can be bolded at first use, preferably also in the lead paragraph. For all these changes, you can get more info from our Manual of Style. Again, I want to thank you for your time in putting this together, and for having the patience and perseverence to last through the first rocky attempts. Happy editing! AKRadecki^Speaketh 22:12, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your support. Your kind words makes me feel much more motivated to continue my work on wikipedia. :) Thank you! :) Lmsmartins (talk) 01:17, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image use

Kindly note that images which have permission for use only on Wikipedia aren't accepted. Stifle (talk) 18:34, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:GlobeStar logo.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:GlobeStar logo.JPG. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 18:54, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:GlobeStar Systems Logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:GlobeStar Systems Logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:14, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:GlobeStar Systems's Logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:GlobeStar Systems's Logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:14, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:GlobeStarSystemsLogo.JPG)

Thanks for uploading File:GlobeStarSystemsLogo.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:14, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Connexall.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:Connexall.JPG. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:05, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Healthcare software

Category:Healthcare software, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. KarlB (talk) 19:33, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of GlobeStar Systems for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article GlobeStar Systems is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GlobeStar Systems until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 05:23, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Connexall.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Connexall.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:14, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]