User talk:Lkenselaar
An article you recently created, SwiftUI, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 10:47, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
- The page was improperly moved to Draft space, as it does not satisfy WP:DRAFTIFY 2a-ii - "it would have very little chance of survival at AfD." Therefore I have restored it to main space. - Fuzheado | Talk 17:19, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SwiftUI until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.