User talk:Lengis

Re: Jesus

You are now in violation of WP:3RR. Please stop violating policy. Thanks...KHM03 04:21, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your violation of WP:3RR has been reported. Please stop violating policy. KHM03 04:32, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do not remove warnings from your user talk page. --jpgordon ∇∆∇∆ 04:42, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism?

When you vandalized my user page, you claimed that you had reported me for vandalism. May I ask: what article(s) did I vandalize and to whom was I reported? Just curious. KHM03 05:03, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lengis, threatening to ban people from Wikipedia, particularly when you have no authority or ability to do so, is a violation of numerous Wikipedia policies. In addition, you have violated the Three Revert Rule and have vandalized other Wikipedian's pages. If you continue to do this, you will find that those of us with the authority and ability to ban users will take appropriate action. -- Essjay · Talk 00:05, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Block

You have been blocked for violation of the Three Revert Rule and for vandalism. If you choose to continue this behavior when your block expires, you will be subject to further blocks. -- Essjay · Talk 00:02, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blanking

Blanking your talk page to remove block notices, especially while blocked, is bad form. Please do not do this again. -- Essjay · Talk 04:49, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image

Hi Lengis. You are quite mistaken about the Nintendo images you uploaded for Link (Legend of Zelda). It doesn't matter whether Nintendo distributed these images themselves or not. They are screenshots from copyrighted material and as such, Nintendo owns them in their entirety, regardless of who took the screenshot. To use these images, we have to assert fair use, and the images have to be properly tagged. Having many similar depictions of Link in the same article weakens the case for fair use, and frankly, I don't think that SSBM screenshot adds anything to the article anyway. The images you uploaded have a tagged that falsely pretends that the images are free to use. This is incorrect. I have removed the SSBM screenshot again. Please take some time to read Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and Wikipedia:Image use policy. Afterwards, if you really think the SSBM screenshot is a necessary addition to the article, tag it properly and re-add it. I won't touch it again. Phils 07:59, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Moving pages (Killzone PS3)

Next time you want to move a page, don't cut and paste the contents into it. Up at the top is a "move" tab that will properly move a page. Thunderbrand 02:02, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:104186024_2eb4b5831b.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:104186024_2eb4b5831b.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rette tast 18:35, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Anita Dark for deletion

The article Anita Dark is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anita Dark until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. NW (Talk) 22:43, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Ss astal lvl3.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Ss astal lvl3.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:52, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Primal Rage II.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Primal Rage II.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:43, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]