User talk:Legolas2186/Archive 41
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Legolas2186. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 35 | ← | Archive 39 | Archive 40 | Archive 41 | Archive 42 | Archive 43 | Archive 44 |
Should this article really not be located at Madonna? I find it quite ridiculous that it isn't. What's so harmful about a disambiguation page? I find it hard to believe the reason if because of this. Hell, one of the most common names in the world Britney redirects to Britney Spears, but Madonna can't have Madonna? It's not even like it's only a stage name; it's her legal name. — Status {talkcontribs 17:53, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
- Frankly Zach, I dont give a damn about dabs. They can be anything as long as I don't have to keep on changing them everytime. — Legolas (talk2me) 13:06, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
Blond Ambition World Tour
you can turn the article in GA?Flores,Alberto (talk) 18:50, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
If possible...
... bless me with your precious assistance on the FAC of "Single Ladies". Jivesh1205 (Talk) 17:48, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
- Lol, you made me drop my chicken.. He he, wat kinda? — Legolas (talk2me) 17:55, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
- Avi, reviewers are repeatedly bringing the same thing, especially Efe. I cannot take this anymore. Is it so difficult to read the whole FAC before posting. And everyone is saying in my taste, in my opinion, in my... Am i expected to write the same article in 13 different ways to conform to their individual preferences? Jivesh1205 (Talk) 17:57, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
- What exactly is Mark saying? What doesn't he find appropriate? And NO, you are NOT to modify the article just to suit someone's preference. If you do not find something to be agreeable, just write below it: "I do not find this comment actionable because .. [reason]". Just look at the FAC for Madonna. I had done everything to keep my patience, including breaking my coffee mug. — Legolas (talk2me) 18:02, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
- Lol. Avi, you just cheered me up. Read Efe comments. I have already explained everything to him. But you know how he is. He does not want live performances to be described. He is saying that I have written the background section from my personal understanding (That's what we are supposed to do, right but heaven knows what he wants). He even wants the parodies to be summarized in the lead. What was he thinking while typing that? He wants me to elaborate on Knowles as herself simply because "Single Ladies" is about Sasha. etc etc etc. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 18:05, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
- Please Avi. Please read his comments and see how you can reply him. I have already done that but he won't break like your coffee mug. Lol. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 18:10, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
- I read them. A little far-fetched and yes, the OWN like statements are showing. Your replies are fine and to the point. I also just realized it that Moisejp has commented and supported. This FAC WILL pass. Mark it. :) — Legolas (talk2me) 18:17, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
- Oh thanks. And Sandy suggested a copy-editor to me. He is called Malleus. After talking to him for weeks, he supported. Nikki told me that his vote weighs a lot in an FAC. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 18:19, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
- It really does. After TOny1 left FAC, Malleus and Moni3 do carry a lot of weight. I do wish Andy and KAren would be back full-time though. Sandy and Ucucha are doing wonderful though. Jivesh what will you treat me with after you get your first FA? :) — Legolas (talk2me) 18:20, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
- I have no idea. What do you want? Jivesh1205 (Talk) 18:28, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
- It really does. After TOny1 left FAC, Malleus and Moni3 do carry a lot of weight. I do wish Andy and KAren would be back full-time though. Sandy and Ucucha are doing wonderful though. Jivesh what will you treat me with after you get your first FA? :) — Legolas (talk2me) 18:20, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
- Oh thanks. And Sandy suggested a copy-editor to me. He is called Malleus. After talking to him for weeks, he supported. Nikki told me that his vote weighs a lot in an FAC. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 18:19, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
- I read them. A little far-fetched and yes, the OWN like statements are showing. Your replies are fine and to the point. I also just realized it that Moisejp has commented and supported. This FAC WILL pass. Mark it. :) — Legolas (talk2me) 18:17, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
- Please Avi. Please read his comments and see how you can reply him. I have already done that but he won't break like your coffee mug. Lol. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 18:10, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
- Lol. Avi, you just cheered me up. Read Efe comments. I have already explained everything to him. But you know how he is. He does not want live performances to be described. He is saying that I have written the background section from my personal understanding (That's what we are supposed to do, right but heaven knows what he wants). He even wants the parodies to be summarized in the lead. What was he thinking while typing that? He wants me to elaborate on Knowles as herself simply because "Single Ladies" is about Sasha. etc etc etc. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 18:05, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
- What exactly is Mark saying? What doesn't he find appropriate? And NO, you are NOT to modify the article just to suit someone's preference. If you do not find something to be agreeable, just write below it: "I do not find this comment actionable because .. [reason]". Just look at the FAC for Madonna. I had done everything to keep my patience, including breaking my coffee mug. — Legolas (talk2me) 18:02, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
- Avi, reviewers are repeatedly bringing the same thing, especially Efe. I cannot take this anymore. Is it so difficult to read the whole FAC before posting. And everyone is saying in my taste, in my opinion, in my... Am i expected to write the same article in 13 different ways to conform to their individual preferences? Jivesh1205 (Talk) 17:57, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
Do you know how to reduce the quality of a music file? Jivesh1205 (Talk) 06:14, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Nopes, I always depend on others for it. :D — Legolas (talk2me) 06:20, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Please explain this to me: Well—a few things. Beyonce referring to herself as "it"? Equating herself to bling? Handing herself over to a man who will determine her self-worth through a demeaning, years-long game which can only end with Beyonce emerging triumphant as his symbolic property, or crawling away as a meaningless ex? Jivesh1205 (Talk) 13:35, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- The writer actually feels that the lyrics of the song, where Knowles sings about finding a better man, and just being triumphant and vile, actually portrays women in a derogatory manner. The writer contrasts the general feedback of the song as an empowerment theme, to that of a derogatory pun. — Legolas (talk2me) 13:46, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- I will let you see how I will treat him now. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 13:50, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Are you talking about the red and dirty wig woman's articles that's not even supposed to be C-class and will never pass FAC? I gotcha yo mind! — Legolas (talk2me) 14:03, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Lol. I was talking about the one who wrote that article about Beyonce. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 14:07, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- I know how to turn a situation to my advantage. :D :P — Legolas (talk2me) 14:10, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- You really do because you are the ... BEST. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 14:13, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- I know how to turn a situation to my advantage. :D :P — Legolas (talk2me) 14:10, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Lol. I was talking about the one who wrote that article about Beyonce. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 14:07, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Are you talking about the red and dirty wig woman's articles that's not even supposed to be C-class and will never pass FAC? I gotcha yo mind! — Legolas (talk2me) 14:03, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- I will let you see how I will treat him now. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 13:50, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Hmmm
How about run Madonna for TFA the day the new album comes out? —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 18:43, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
- How do I do that? I have absolutely no clue about TFA. — Legolas (talk2me) 06:21, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- WP:TFAR. You post your nomination for TFA and consensus is developed. Then Raul or Dabomb will schedule it for the main page. —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 11:03, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Follow-up on Jennifer Lopez filmography
I would appreciate it if you were to look over the article one last time before I close the peer review. Thank you, — Status {talkcontribs 01:24, 20 December 2011 (UTC) (This message is being sent to everybody involved in the PR.)
Opinion
Would you mind weighing in your opinion here —Commander (Ping me) 16:36, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Like a Prayer
Legolas, thank you for your note. I was just thinking yesterday, "I've got to get back to Legolas soon—he's probably wondering what's happening." I did read through it once several days ago and you probably noticed I made some small edits. I also noticed a few little things I was going to bring up. I'm going to read through it once more and try to see what else I can catch. Let's see, when can I promise to do that by... How about by Christmas? I'll be in touch again very, very soon! Moisejp (talk) 15:59, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- OMG, I didn't realize that PR was open and that it has been waiting on my comments. I think you mentioned something about a PR a while back, but to be honest I don't know if I've ever participated in one, so I didn't realize exactly how they worked. OK, I will get some comments on there by around Christmas. Talk soon, Moisejp (talk) 16:19, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Legolas, my plan is to spend a bunch of time on "Like a Prayer" on the 24th. Talk to you then! Moisejp (talk) 16:10, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
It hurts so much to be in love with a masterpiece.
It really is. "Masterpiece" was randomly released on an iTunes podcast on the 7th and NOBODY noticed. Well, here we go. The final HQ song. Stunning. GO MADGE! Also confirmed, first song on the album is called "Trust" co-written by Sia (Xtina's You Lost Me) and produced by William Orbit. There's also gonna be a USB version of the album. Interscope is really gettin' to work. — Status {talkcontribs 05:45, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
- YESSS!!!! I can't believe that Madge gave us "Masterpiece". I was more than 100% confirmed that she had lost that edge of balladry. And yeah, I did hear about "Trust". SMH at the premature article creation and the bullshit dumped in it. — Legolas (talk2me) 05:47, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
- I never really got into her ballads until recently, but they SLAYY! Ikr? I was actually reading through it the other day, and the composition is pretty much all speculation. Why does MTV even say that Nicki sings the "L U V Madonna" on the demo when she doesn't? Also, did you hear the leaker of the song got arrested? That's what you get for leaking a Madge song, BITCH! — Status {talkcontribs 00:22, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- Serves the person right. You don't play fool with Madonna and get away can you? Never. Also, the Sia song sounds like another Masterpiece for the album, if its anything closer to "Live to Tell". — Legolas (talk2me) 03:09, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- I never really got into her ballads until recently, but they SLAYY! Ikr? I was actually reading through it the other day, and the composition is pretty much all speculation. Why does MTV even say that Nicki sings the "L U V Madonna" on the demo when she doesn't? Also, did you hear the leaker of the song got arrested? That's what you get for leaking a Madge song, BITCH! — Status {talkcontribs 00:22, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
TLIAT
I was simply trying to neaten the section which stated itself that TLIAT was released as a single. There's no need to threaten to report me when clearly I was not vandalizing the page, it was just my mistake. A condescending, elitist attitude is never attractive but then again I'm not surprised. Maybe you should actually correct the page yourself now instead of just reverting other edits in tune with the page, which says and I quote "It was released as the second single off the album". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 333cale (talk • contribs) 05:27, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
- Other pages business in other pages. And you have just made another account reverting the same edit. I have to raise an SPI. — Legolas (talk2me) 05:45, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
I have nothing to do with any other account editing that page, check the IP... I'm not going to continue bothering to neaten up messy articles like that if "experienced" users like you threaten to report me for an honest mistake. See if I care, really... and you should stop taking pride in wikipedia "authority" by the way. It doesn't scare or impress anyone. 333cale (talk) 01:37, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Byebyebabymusicvideo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Byebyebabymusicvideo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 10:56, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete this please. — Legolas (talk2me) 11:19, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
Merry Christmas!
Merry Christmas to you Legolas and all my friends! I hope you all enjoy this Christmas :) Novice7 (talk) 12:55, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
- Legolas, have you listened to this woman's songs? Novice7 (talk) 12:55, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
- Mery Christmas to you to Mags. Isn't that Namie the K-pop goddess? — Legolas (talk2me) 13:00, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
- The J-pop goddess [1][2] :) Novice7 (talk) 13:13, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
- Mery Christmas to you to Mags. Isn't that Namie the K-pop goddess? — Legolas (talk2me) 13:00, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
Season's Greetings
|
May you have a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year | |
| It's the festive time of the year, and I wish you a Merry Christmas and Happy New Year! If you do not celebrate Christmas, may it be a peaceful time for you, and may the New Year bring you new hopes and good luck. Season's Greetings --&レア (talk) 18:07, 22 December 2011 (UTC)|} |
My Sincere Wishes For This Festive Season
|
★*★*★*★*★*★*★*★* Merry Christmas And Happy New Year 2012 *★*★*★*★*★*★*★*★ | |
| I Wish You And Your Family A Merry Christmas And A Happy New Year 2012. May The New Year Bring Much Happiness, Prosperity, Peace, And Success In Your Life. I Am Very Happy To be Part of Wikipedia And To Have Great Friends Like You. Cheers.
- From A Big Fan of |
- Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year to you Boy-y-y-y-y-y-y--yyyyyy. May the lights from Beysus Christ's eyes dazzle and surround you in the eternal flame of love, peace and harmony. — Legolas (talk2me) 07:09, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks Avi. That's the BEST (styled) wish I have received yet. :D Jivesh1205 (Talk) 05:39, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
- Are the composition of this and this decent for an FA? Jivesh1205 (Talk) 10:10, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
- Both have nice composition sections, better than some FACs really. But holy moly, reduce the critical reception of BTINH, it crosses way into WP:UNDUE territory. — Legolas (talk2me) 10:16, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
- Ok Avi. Should I remove positive reviews or negative ones or both? Jivesh1205 (Talk) 10:19, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
- Not remove, rather shorten them. REmove instances like where the reviewer is just yapping about the lyrics instead of analyzing it. Or wording like "Wooooh, she's fyreeeee" kinda language. You get my point? — Legolas (talk2me) 10:22, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
- I am not sure but let me do it first. When I finish, have a look when you are free. :)) Jivesh1205 (Talk) 10:26, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
- I have finished. I removed 2200 Kbs. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 05:47, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- Compare the critical reception of BTINH and this and tell me what do you think is missing. Except the addition of a reviewer's image. I want you to do this exercise and write down points. — Legolas (talk2me) 05:52, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
The opening sentence like the song was received with favorable / mixed to positive / mixed / negative blabla. Right? Jivesh1205 (Talk) 05:59, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- Compare the critical reception of BTINH and this and tell me what do you think is missing. Except the addition of a reviewer's image. I want you to do this exercise and write down points. — Legolas (talk2me) 05:52, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- I have finished. I removed 2200 Kbs. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 05:47, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- I am not sure but let me do it first. When I finish, have a look when you are free. :)) Jivesh1205 (Talk) 10:26, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
- Not remove, rather shorten them. REmove instances like where the reviewer is just yapping about the lyrics instead of analyzing it. Or wording like "Wooooh, she's fyreeeee" kinda language. You get my point? — Legolas (talk2me) 10:22, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
- Ok Avi. Should I remove positive reviews or negative ones or both? Jivesh1205 (Talk) 10:19, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
- Both have nice composition sections, better than some FACs really. But holy moly, reduce the critical reception of BTINH, it crosses way into WP:UNDUE territory. — Legolas (talk2me) 10:16, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
Wait. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 06:01, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- No. — Legolas (talk2me) 06:01, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- No idea :( Jivesh1205 (Talk) 06:04, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- Hint. The flow. PS see Gaga's reply about Bee. — Legolas (talk2me) 06:05, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- Isn't it good? You mean the New York one should be moved? I thought it was positive, right? P.S I am so happy.Jivesh1205 (Talk) 06:13, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- Critical reception sections are generally supposed to be about quotes, but if the flow from one review to another is not good, then it becomes a WP:QUOTEFARM. Which has happened here. Check the reviews again, see their similarity, then club them together, making the sentences conjoint and conjugal in the stream. — Legolas (talk2me) 06:18, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- Is it better? Hey you said nothing about the gif? *weeps* Jivesh1205 (Talk) 06:23, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- Even you can say that it makes the flow better. And I'm at office. Can't see gifs :( — Legolas (talk2me) 06:32, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- Okay. Have a look when you are back at home. I do not want to disturb you right now. I know you are working. Lol. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 06:37, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- Even you can say that it makes the flow better. And I'm at office. Can't see gifs :( — Legolas (talk2me) 06:32, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- Is it better? Hey you said nothing about the gif? *weeps* Jivesh1205 (Talk) 06:23, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- Critical reception sections are generally supposed to be about quotes, but if the flow from one review to another is not good, then it becomes a WP:QUOTEFARM. Which has happened here. Check the reviews again, see their similarity, then club them together, making the sentences conjoint and conjugal in the stream. — Legolas (talk2me) 06:18, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- Isn't it good? You mean the New York one should be moved? I thought it was positive, right? P.S I am so happy.Jivesh1205 (Talk) 06:13, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- Hint. The flow. PS see Gaga's reply about Bee. — Legolas (talk2me) 06:05, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- No idea :( Jivesh1205 (Talk) 06:04, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar |
| We don't talk much, but your work doesn't go unnoticed. Can't wait for Hard Candy follow-up. ;) Ben•TalkThatTalk2me 19:29, 23 December 2011 (UTC) |
My Heartfelt Thanks
I express you my heartfelt thanks. ""Single Ladies (Put a Ring on It)" has passed. I am very happy. Your feedback and kind words helped me considerably. Thanks again. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 11:16, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- YESSSS!!!!! "4 Minutes" has a friend now. Beyyy + Madggee... OMG.. KAwaiiii — Legolas (talk2me) 11:20, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- *tears* RiRi has joined them too. —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 11:23, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- Yes. Another one is coming soon. I am very happy. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 11:26, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- Grrr.. I can't see gifs... explain.. else I will give you exams. — Legolas (talk2me) 11:27, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- All we need now is "Bad Romance" and we're done. ;) —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 11:28, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- Lol. I won't Avi. Today is my day to be naughty. :P @ Penguin. include your LTWYL in it. :) Jivesh1205 (Talk) 11:29, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- Yes Jivoo... be as naughty as you want... This is your and Tomica's day. Wish you guys were here when "4 Minutes" was promoted. Would have shared the joy too. WP, "LTWYL" and "Bad Romance" has a chance too I believe. But "Like a Prayer" comes in the beginning. — Legolas (talk2me) 11:31, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- I just hope so... :) —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 11:34, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- Yes Jivoo... be as naughty as you want... This is your and Tomica's day. Wish you guys were here when "4 Minutes" was promoted. Would have shared the joy too. WP, "LTWYL" and "Bad Romance" has a chance too I believe. But "Like a Prayer" comes in the beginning. — Legolas (talk2me) 11:31, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- Lol. I won't Avi. Today is my day to be naughty. :P @ Penguin. include your LTWYL in it. :) Jivesh1205 (Talk) 11:29, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- All we need now is "Bad Romance" and we're done. ;) —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 11:28, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- Grrr.. I can't see gifs... explain.. else I will give you exams. — Legolas (talk2me) 11:27, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- Yes. Another one is coming soon. I am very happy. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 11:26, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- *tears* RiRi has joined them too. —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 11:23, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- Avi, don't make me emotional. We will share your joy when LAP is promoted. We love you Avi. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 11:40, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- Lol, lets see what happens in the FAC. Fingers crossed that I dont have to have a drawn out FAC like SLs and Rehabs. It will be cute. :D — Legolas (talk2me) 11:43, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- You certainly won't be failing on comprehensiveness grounds. lol —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 11:46, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- I echo Penguin's sentiments. Some reviewers are so.... 'out of this world'. (Should I say music world?) Lol. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 11:49, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- This is what I will do to them then. Chillax — Legolas (talk2me) 11:53, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- Not bad. But this is better or this or this. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 12:00, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- Sandy and Ucucha will love that lol. —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 12:00, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- Not bad. But this is better or this or this. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 12:00, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- This is what I will do to them then. Chillax — Legolas (talk2me) 11:53, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- I echo Penguin's sentiments. Some reviewers are so.... 'out of this world'. (Should I say music world?) Lol. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 11:49, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- You certainly won't be failing on comprehensiveness grounds. lol —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 11:46, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- Lol, lets see what happens in the FAC. Fingers crossed that I dont have to have a drawn out FAC like SLs and Rehabs. It will be cute. :D — Legolas (talk2me) 11:43, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- Avi, don't make me emotional. We will share your joy when LAP is promoted. We love you Avi. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 11:40, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
(→) I hope they are not reading this. Lol, — Legolas (talk2me) 12:01, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- They better not. Chillax is a dialogue by Katrina Kaif in Maine Pyar Kyun Kiya, right? Jivesh1205 (Talk) 12:03, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- Avi, the Beyonentourage just congratulated me on the FAC. I can't deal with this. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 12:07, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- Jivesh, you should let Andrew know about the FAC. —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 12:10, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- Okay. Beyonce just uploaded this. The RedTop Club edit is HEAVEN TO MY EARS. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 12:12, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, Andrew would be so so happy. Also, let Axl know. — Legolas (talk2me) 12:13, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- He is a big fan of the song. He will be very happy. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 12:15, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- Done. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 12:18, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- Lolzzzzzzz. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 13:24, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- If you only see the one at WP:RIHANNA. You need to learn some shade trowin from me. :D — Legolas (talk2me) 13:26, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- Lol. You will never change. And you better not. I agree. Can I get admission to your class? Jivesh1205 (Talk) 13:28, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- Lol, already fail with that red link.... :P — Legolas (talk2me) 13:30, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- Lol. You will never change. And you better not. I agree. Can I get admission to your class? Jivesh1205 (Talk) 13:28, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- If you only see the one at WP:RIHANNA. You need to learn some shade trowin from me. :D — Legolas (talk2me) 13:26, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- Lolzzzzzzz. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 13:24, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- Done. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 12:18, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- He is a big fan of the song. He will be very happy. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 12:15, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, Andrew would be so so happy. Also, let Axl know. — Legolas (talk2me) 12:13, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- Okay. Beyonce just uploaded this. The RedTop Club edit is HEAVEN TO MY EARS. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 12:12, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- Jivesh, you should let Andrew know about the FAC. —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 12:10, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- Avi, the Beyonentourage just congratulated me on the FAC. I can't deal with this. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 12:07, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- I never thought 4 will appear on all those critics year-end lists. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 13:32, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- Oh God... Stan show them Bey-Bey boys how's it done eh? Beysus Christ is nevertheless happy and singing carols with #stupidassman erm Nigga erm... ZZZZZ.. erm Jay-Z. — Legolas (talk2me) 13:34, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- I hate Jay-Z. Avi, do you know (I mean I know you don't for sure but do you have an idea) why 4 was snubbed at the Grammys? There was even a big drama about it on Twitter and MTV wrote an article criticizing the Grammys. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 13:38, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- "I GUESS I GOT MA SWAGGA BACK!" lol —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 13:39, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- What is that word? Beyonce uses it on "Video Phone", right? But what is it? Jivesh1205 (Talk) 13:40, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- "Otis". —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 13:41, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- The word is swagger, means somebody's particular style, creed, rapport etc. Yes, why was 4 snubbed? A critical hit like that is Grammy's fav. — Legolas (talk2me) 13:43, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- Lol. You don't even know that Twitter uproar. And MTV saying "The Grammys think Ms Knowles have enough awards", it's time for others to collect some. Lol. The fact that it made ALL critics year-end lists proves that it was really *snubbed*. And jokes apart, what is Loud doing there? Even Zach asked me that. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 13:46, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- Oh I knew that Twitter uproar. And as to Loud, I have no idea what's it doing there same as I didn't have any idea why Teenage Dream was nominated. — Legolas (talk2me) 13:50, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- Do Grammys take sales into count then? —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 13:52, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- They see commercial aspects its true, but its not a hard and fast rule. The critical measurement is the beneficial factor. — Legolas (talk2me) 13:52, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- TD has only 52/100 at MC. Yes, I think Grammy have become commercial (but that's not Grammy are supposed to be about). I am not asking for a lot. A nomination for 4 in the R&B category would have been fine with me. Nevertheless, 4 is already at 2.2 million in 5 months with three *flop* singles. And nothing for "1+1"? That song is number one on many lists. I don't see Katy Perry there. *confused* But "Firework" deserves some recognition. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 13:55, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- That explains why 21 and Doo-Wops & Hooligans have been so successful. By the way, if Firework were to get any recognition, it were to be for its video, that's all. —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 13:59, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- I don't get the first part of your message? No love for "Firework"? Lol. People in my country love that song. It is the best song Katy Perry has ever done. It has no BS lyrics for once. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 14:03, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- I guess it is good in the sense that it's not about peacocks. lol —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 14:06, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- For me, Teenage Dream is a good album. Lol but I cannot stand "Peacock" and "Circle the Drain". I have grown to love LMFAO PRA and SAINI a lot. Lol. Hey how am I supposed to change the GA template of SL to a star on the top of my user page? Jivesh1205 (Talk) 14:10, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- Let me guess, you have a gif of "Sexy and I know It"? Lol. Love that track. —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 14:11, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- No. I don't. Lol. That video sucks. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 14:13, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- Let me guess, you have a gif of "Sexy and I know It"? Lol. Love that track. —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 14:11, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- For me, Teenage Dream is a good album. Lol but I cannot stand "Peacock" and "Circle the Drain". I have grown to love LMFAO PRA and SAINI a lot. Lol. Hey how am I supposed to change the GA template of SL to a star on the top of my user page? Jivesh1205 (Talk) 14:10, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- I guess it is good in the sense that it's not about peacocks. lol —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 14:06, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- I don't get the first part of your message? No love for "Firework"? Lol. People in my country love that song. It is the best song Katy Perry has ever done. It has no BS lyrics for once. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 14:03, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- That explains why 21 and Doo-Wops & Hooligans have been so successful. By the way, if Firework were to get any recognition, it were to be for its video, that's all. —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 13:59, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- TD has only 52/100 at MC. Yes, I think Grammy have become commercial (but that's not Grammy are supposed to be about). I am not asking for a lot. A nomination for 4 in the R&B category would have been fine with me. Nevertheless, 4 is already at 2.2 million in 5 months with three *flop* singles. And nothing for "1+1"? That song is number one on many lists. I don't see Katy Perry there. *confused* But "Firework" deserves some recognition. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 13:55, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- They see commercial aspects its true, but its not a hard and fast rule. The critical measurement is the beneficial factor. — Legolas (talk2me) 13:52, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- Do Grammys take sales into count then? —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 13:52, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- Oh I knew that Twitter uproar. And as to Loud, I have no idea what's it doing there same as I didn't have any idea why Teenage Dream was nominated. — Legolas (talk2me) 13:50, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- Lol. You don't even know that Twitter uproar. And MTV saying "The Grammys think Ms Knowles have enough awards", it's time for others to collect some. Lol. The fact that it made ALL critics year-end lists proves that it was really *snubbed*. And jokes apart, what is Loud doing there? Even Zach asked me that. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 13:46, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- What is that word? Beyonce uses it on "Video Phone", right? But what is it? Jivesh1205 (Talk) 13:40, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- "I GUESS I GOT MA SWAGGA BACK!" lol —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 13:39, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- I hate Jay-Z. Avi, do you know (I mean I know you don't for sure but do you have an idea) why 4 was snubbed at the Grammys? There was even a big drama about it on Twitter and MTV wrote an article criticizing the Grammys. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 13:38, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- Oh God... Stan show them Bey-Bey boys how's it done eh? Beysus Christ is nevertheless happy and singing carols with #stupidassman erm Nigga erm... ZZZZZ.. erm Jay-Z. — Legolas (talk2me) 13:34, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- I am so happy guys :D I want "LTWYL" and "LAP" come in the box with "Rehab" and "SL" in very soon time. And I am also sure they will. Guys you A my very best Wiki Friends :D ... My life would suck without you ! — Tomica1111 • Question Existing? 14:17, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
Happy holidays!!
=) Crystal Clear x3 13:33, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- Same to you Crystal. List of accolades received by W.E. seems nearer now. :D — Legolas (talk2me) 13:35, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year !
|
Merry Chrismats and Happy New Year ! |
| Merry Christmas and Happy New Year! May you be surrounded by all the things that bring Christmas cheer. :D ! — Tomica1111 • Question Existing? 20:43, 24 December 2011 (UTC) |
- Merry Christmas and Happy New Year to you too Tomica, although you have already received your best gift. :P — Legolas (talk2me) 05:50, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- Good morning my dearest bro. Avi, can you please tell me whether the rationale of the music sample of "Halo" looks good to you? Jivesh1205 (Talk) 06:12, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- Ask Milburn, he's the best at this thing. — Legolas (talk2me) 06:14, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- Okay. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 06:24, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- There. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 06:38, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- Definitely ... "Rehab" + passing all my exams, would be the best Christmas present this year for me :) ! — Tomica1111 • Question Existing? 08:36, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- There. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 06:38, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- Okay. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 06:24, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- Ask Milburn, he's the best at this thing. — Legolas (talk2me) 06:14, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- Good morning my dearest bro. Avi, can you please tell me whether the rationale of the music sample of "Halo" looks good to you? Jivesh1205 (Talk) 06:12, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Madonna-Truth or Dare-Perfume.jpg
A tag has been placed on File:Madonna-Truth or Dare-Perfume.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{non-free fair use in|article name that the file is used in}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:25, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
Your DYK nom for Truth or Dare (fragrance)
Hi Legolas, I've reviewed your nomination at Template:Did you know nominations/Truth or Dare (fragrance) and there are some issues with paraphrasing and NPOV. Could you please see my comments at the nomination page and reply there? Thanks. Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:36, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
Munchies
Thanks for the brownies! They look delicious. Yum yum! Moisejp (talk) 19:09, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
You have to see this
atrl.net/forums/showthread.php?t=133577
I don't know the one who did it but they are simply... I don't get the word.
Jivesh1205 (Talk) 09:10, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- Umm... shall I realllyyyyyy comment? :P — Legolas (talk2me) 13:37, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- It got closed almost immediately. Lol. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 13:52, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- Jivesh, can you copy-edit Truth or Dare? It won't take time. Please do it for me. — Legolas (talk2me) 13:56, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- Yes. I will. But keep in mind that I ma not great. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 14:02, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- Bakwaas. Now DO YOUR JOB!!! :D — Legolas (talk2me) 14:02, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- Lol. You know that's true. :))) Jivesh1205 (Talk) 14:06, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- She disagrees. — Legolas (talk2me) 14:07, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- You are very nice Avi. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 14:15, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- Am I ready to give up on my R00d Boy surname? :D — Legolas (talk2me) 14:19, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- Yes. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 14:26, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- Done. And see Tom's page. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 14:37, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- Yes. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 14:26, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- Am I ready to give up on my R00d Boy surname? :D — Legolas (talk2me) 14:19, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- You are very nice Avi. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 14:15, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- She disagrees. — Legolas (talk2me) 14:07, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- Lol. You know that's true. :))) Jivesh1205 (Talk) 14:06, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- Bakwaas. Now DO YOUR JOB!!! :D — Legolas (talk2me) 14:02, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- Yes. I will. But keep in mind that I ma not great. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 14:02, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- Jivesh, can you copy-edit Truth or Dare? It won't take time. Please do it for me. — Legolas (talk2me) 13:56, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- It got closed almost immediately. Lol. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 13:52, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
He's learning
[3] —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 14:11, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- Not buying it. Wait till it comes and starts the mad-man jump on my or Axl's talk page. — Legolas (talk2me) 14:13, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- Lol "Go die you piece of shit". Anytime now. —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 14:15, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- Me and Axl, especially him, are medical miracles at the number of times we have died (laughing) on his shit tbf. — Legolas (talk2me) 14:18, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- I wish I could. But he only vandalized me a few times, some of which were censored by Oversighters before I got to read them. This is almost as good though. —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 14:24, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- OMG! Who is this little trouble?:D — Tomica1111 • Question Existing? 14:26, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- Trolls for breakfast? LMAO!! That's just classic. We have such a diva / legend / icon amongst us. Shine under its holy lights Stan, repent for all ya sins. — Legolas (talk2me) 14:27, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- Best part was, when I was on Igloo, I didn't even know I was reverting my own page. xD —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 14:29, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- Lol, YA I don't like IGLOO that much. Twinkle is the best I can deal with. Tomica, Please read WP:Sockpuppet investigations/CharlieJS13 and get enlightened. — Legolas (talk2me) 14:33, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- I hate how TW adds everything to your watchlist and it's so slow! Anyway, we have Brexx, Charlie, Theman, anyone else I need to know about? —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 14:36, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- The original diva Dance-pop (talk · contribs) and ElPilotoDi (talk · contribs), although the later is delegated to iamges only. But no-one can topple Dance-pop. I beg you to go through its history, its the stuff legends are made up of. — Legolas (talk2me) 14:40, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- Lol, "Legalos"? —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 14:42, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- That's not the only buahahahahaha worthy stuff :D — Legolas (talk2me) 14:46, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- His username is enough to laugh about. Hehe. You're right though. His edits are pretty "wtf". —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 14:50, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- That's not the only buahahahahaha worthy stuff :D — Legolas (talk2me) 14:46, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- Lol, "Legalos"? —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 14:42, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- The original diva Dance-pop (talk · contribs) and ElPilotoDi (talk · contribs), although the later is delegated to iamges only. But no-one can topple Dance-pop. I beg you to go through its history, its the stuff legends are made up of. — Legolas (talk2me) 14:40, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- I hate how TW adds everything to your watchlist and it's so slow! Anyway, we have Brexx, Charlie, Theman, anyone else I need to know about? —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 14:36, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- Lol, YA I don't like IGLOO that much. Twinkle is the best I can deal with. Tomica, Please read WP:Sockpuppet investigations/CharlieJS13 and get enlightened. — Legolas (talk2me) 14:33, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- Best part was, when I was on Igloo, I didn't even know I was reverting my own page. xD —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 14:29, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- Trolls for breakfast? LMAO!! That's just classic. We have such a diva / legend / icon amongst us. Shine under its holy lights Stan, repent for all ya sins. — Legolas (talk2me) 14:27, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- OMG! Who is this little trouble?:D — Tomica1111 • Question Existing? 14:26, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- I wish I could. But he only vandalized me a few times, some of which were censored by Oversighters before I got to read them. This is almost as good though. —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 14:24, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- Me and Axl, especially him, are medical miracles at the number of times we have died (laughing) on his shit tbf. — Legolas (talk2me) 14:18, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- Lol "Go die you piece of shit". Anytime now. —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 14:15, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
(→) And so is his sockpuppeting. Search the database, you will be amazed and just drop dead on teh floor at the sock names. — Legolas (talk2me) 14:52, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- Someone give this poor child an award: [4] [5] —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 14:54, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- Snigger..... Imagnie how I have controlled myself, that too when I was Novice (pun unintended) here. — Legolas (talk2me) 14:55, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- Dude, you've got to go self-nom at RfA. —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 15:01, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- Dear lrod, where is this coming from? Rfa and me are polar opposites just like Malleus and non-controversy are. ^_* — Legolas (talk2me) 15:02, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- LOL. But think about how pleasurable it would be to stick a {{blocked}} on any IP that begins with 86.xx.xx.xx. —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 15:08, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- Meh, if I stick up that always, from where will "Go die you pile of shit" come from? That line has just been inducted into the Wikipedia Abusing Hall of Fame 2011. — Legolas (talk2me) 15:10, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- Put "Go waddle off you fucking penguin" in there too. —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 15:13, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- What about "I swar I will make you drink cum you Mexican fajita, if its the last thing I do"? Worthy of an Oscar? — Legolas (talk2me) 15:14, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- If Toy Story 3 can win one, why not this then? —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 15:18, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- What about "Blah blah blah Legalos... this is madness and I kick you in the death hole"? PS: I wrote this in correct spellings) ^_* — Legolas (talk2me) 15:20, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- I never saw the day a troll would use a 300 reference. Awesome. —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 15:21, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- Please see the sock Dance-pop is back (talk · contribs). *Cries* — Legolas (talk2me) 15:23, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- HEY LOOK AT ME LEGALOS! I AM A SOCKPUPPET! I AM GOING TO GET BLOCKED! —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 15:26, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- This was the reason for my rebirth tres times. — Legolas (talk2me) 15:28, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- Hold on a second. I am going to go fill in a definition for "attention whore" at Urbandictionary.com. —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 15:31, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- The user once came back in one of its avatar, called me LEgalos and said "Yu did vandilism and Im not Dunce-poop" Attention whote much? "Dunce" "Poop"? Enough said. — Legolas (talk2me) 15:45, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- Hold on a second. I am going to go fill in a definition for "attention whore" at Urbandictionary.com. —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 15:31, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- This was the reason for my rebirth tres times. — Legolas (talk2me) 15:28, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- HEY LOOK AT ME LEGALOS! I AM A SOCKPUPPET! I AM GOING TO GET BLOCKED! —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 15:26, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- Please see the sock Dance-pop is back (talk · contribs). *Cries* — Legolas (talk2me) 15:23, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- I never saw the day a troll would use a 300 reference. Awesome. —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 15:21, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- What about "Blah blah blah Legalos... this is madness and I kick you in the death hole"? PS: I wrote this in correct spellings) ^_* — Legolas (talk2me) 15:20, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- If Toy Story 3 can win one, why not this then? —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 15:18, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- What about "I swar I will make you drink cum you Mexican fajita, if its the last thing I do"? Worthy of an Oscar? — Legolas (talk2me) 15:14, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- Put "Go waddle off you fucking penguin" in there too. —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 15:13, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- Meh, if I stick up that always, from where will "Go die you pile of shit" come from? That line has just been inducted into the Wikipedia Abusing Hall of Fame 2011. — Legolas (talk2me) 15:10, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- LOL. But think about how pleasurable it would be to stick a {{blocked}} on any IP that begins with 86.xx.xx.xx. —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 15:08, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- Dear lrod, where is this coming from? Rfa and me are polar opposites just like Malleus and non-controversy are. ^_* — Legolas (talk2me) 15:02, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- Dude, you've got to go self-nom at RfA. —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 15:01, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- Snigger..... Imagnie how I have controlled myself, that too when I was Novice (pun unintended) here. — Legolas (talk2me) 14:55, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
Re
Thanks for the back-handed compliment about Rehab. And why so surprised? I've seen IPs make edits on Gaga articles, you've reverted, then realised they are right. Don't forget. Calvin • Watch n' Learn 14:52, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- And your point is? — Legolas (talk2me) 14:54, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- You shouldn't be so judgmental. But I know you don't care about what people think of you anyway so, I will not waste my energy typing in this thread anymore. It's obvious you don't like me, for no apparent reason, so that's your failing, not mine. Calvin • Watch n' Learn 14:56, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- You wanna know why I said surprisingly? Because most of the time, in any article you edit, I see you making same mistakes over references, MoS, sources, content when me, Jivesh and the rest have probably screamed enough times and pointed out them to you in GAN, GAR, FACs etc. Somehow you don't learn and then portray a high-and-mighty attitude in FACs as if they were born to hand the bronze star to you. Guess what? You either earn it, and if you can't then focus, listen to what others are saying, drop the attitude and challenge yourself to better. Calvin, some articles take really long time to pass a certain level and losing your head over it is not the right thing. Call me a bitch all you want, I won't fluff you up to hand you something that's not true. I don't "hate" you, but frankly I stopped caring long back. — Legolas (talk2me) 15:01, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- Calvin, I hope you at least know that I still consider you as my friend but yes, you changed a lot lately and I don't know why. And Avi is somehow right, in all your GANs that I have reviewed, I have to tell you the same things repeatedly. One day, you will have an or many FACs but as Avi said, it is not easy to get one but it is possible. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 15:05, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) I don't expect anyone to hand me a bronze star. You know how hard I've worked on that article, I've been editing it for 6 months now. It's a long to time to be always improving it and making changes that other people say. Like you, I say things how they are, and on GANs, FACs, whatever, if I don't understand what someone means or if I want to make a suggestion, I will say it. It's a two way street. To be honest, with your edit summaries, conversations with other people and comments about me, I really don't understand why you dislike me so much? I mean, what have I ever done to you? Nothing. I knew it was crap what you wrote on Novice's talk page "Me and Calvin have never really got long, but all that will change soon". I've always had the impression that you haven't wanted to get along, with all the sniggers and whispers about me on here. Calvin • Watch n' Learn 15:10, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- Ya, I did want to go along with you after I came back, but seeing your attitude in every FAC, talk pages etc, I changed my mind. As I said, I really don't care about it anymore and I don't "hate" you, I'm indifferent. Please drop this, I'm good on my own way, and you please be on your way, if ever you think about it, remember, attitude is a BIG thing in FACs and in RL also. — Legolas (talk2me) 15:13, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- (edit conflict)Calvin, I am not taking anyone's side but this ^^^ is false. Avi has changed (positively). And please how many times will I tell you to stop thinking about S&M, it will never pass as long as it remains how it is now. You have to work more on it rather than asking for copy-edits. Too many copy-edits spoil the prose and this is an advice Avi gave me in 2010. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 15:15, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) To be honest, I knew nothing would change. Your perception of how I am in FACs is not what I am like in RL, or even in simple conversation in non-wikipedia related things, but you wouldn't know that as you have made no conscious effort to find out. Perhaps it would be enlightening for you to know other people's perceptions of you on here, but I wouldn't drop other people in it. So clearly, I am not the bad person you think I am. Calvin • Watch n' Learn 15:17, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- Godspeed Calvin, and please tell that other person of yours that I'm not interested in their sandboxing. — Legolas (talk2me) 15:19, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) To be honest, I knew nothing would change. Your perception of how I am in FACs is not what I am like in RL, or even in simple conversation in non-wikipedia related things, but you wouldn't know that as you have made no conscious effort to find out. Perhaps it would be enlightening for you to know other people's perceptions of you on here, but I wouldn't drop other people in it. So clearly, I am not the bad person you think I am. Calvin • Watch n' Learn 15:17, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- (edit conflict)Calvin, I am not taking anyone's side but this ^^^ is false. Avi has changed (positively). And please how many times will I tell you to stop thinking about S&M, it will never pass as long as it remains how it is now. You have to work more on it rather than asking for copy-edits. Too many copy-edits spoil the prose and this is an advice Avi gave me in 2010. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 15:15, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- Ya, I did want to go along with you after I came back, but seeing your attitude in every FAC, talk pages etc, I changed my mind. As I said, I really don't care about it anymore and I don't "hate" you, I'm indifferent. Please drop this, I'm good on my own way, and you please be on your way, if ever you think about it, remember, attitude is a BIG thing in FACs and in RL also. — Legolas (talk2me) 15:13, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) I don't expect anyone to hand me a bronze star. You know how hard I've worked on that article, I've been editing it for 6 months now. It's a long to time to be always improving it and making changes that other people say. Like you, I say things how they are, and on GANs, FACs, whatever, if I don't understand what someone means or if I want to make a suggestion, I will say it. It's a two way street. To be honest, with your edit summaries, conversations with other people and comments about me, I really don't understand why you dislike me so much? I mean, what have I ever done to you? Nothing. I knew it was crap what you wrote on Novice's talk page "Me and Calvin have never really got long, but all that will change soon". I've always had the impression that you haven't wanted to get along, with all the sniggers and whispers about me on here. Calvin • Watch n' Learn 15:10, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- Calvin, I hope you at least know that I still consider you as my friend but yes, you changed a lot lately and I don't know why. And Avi is somehow right, in all your GANs that I have reviewed, I have to tell you the same things repeatedly. One day, you will have an or many FACs but as Avi said, it is not easy to get one but it is possible. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 15:05, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- You wanna know why I said surprisingly? Because most of the time, in any article you edit, I see you making same mistakes over references, MoS, sources, content when me, Jivesh and the rest have probably screamed enough times and pointed out them to you in GAN, GAR, FACs etc. Somehow you don't learn and then portray a high-and-mighty attitude in FACs as if they were born to hand the bronze star to you. Guess what? You either earn it, and if you can't then focus, listen to what others are saying, drop the attitude and challenge yourself to better. Calvin, some articles take really long time to pass a certain level and losing your head over it is not the right thing. Call me a bitch all you want, I won't fluff you up to hand you something that's not true. I don't "hate" you, but frankly I stopped caring long back. — Legolas (talk2me) 15:01, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- You shouldn't be so judgmental. But I know you don't care about what people think of you anyway so, I will not waste my energy typing in this thread anymore. It's obvious you don't like me, for no apparent reason, so that's your failing, not mine. Calvin • Watch n' Learn 14:56, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
What? Calvin • Watch n' Learn 15:21, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
Re: Fame Kills
I'll give it a few weeks since the merge discussion was fairly recent and I don't want the article to be failed again for stability reasons. I wonder why Stephen has such a problem with the article. –Chase (talk / contribs) 20:36, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
Happy holidays
|
Happy holidays. | |
| Best wishes for joy and happiness. Hope you have a great one! Jonayo! Selena 4 ever 00:08, 27 December 2011 (UTC) |
- Happy holidays Ajonba. — Legolas (talk2me) 16:08, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
Closing of the AfD on Gimme All Your Luvin (Madonna song)
Interpret it how you want, I just wanted to bring it to your attention.
- [6] ← Check out the closing statement. Keep in mind that there were 10 opinions for delete and 7 for keep.
- [7] ← Check out our conversation on the matter.
| helpdןǝɥ | 03:53, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
- What to do dear? The artist name alone here is trumping all other rules and regulations. People know that this will be eventually created and that's what seems the case here. — Legolas (talk2me) 16:08, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
Is...
... this reliable? The information is true but I cannot find a reliable source for it, nor can I find one which stated that Thierry Mugler designed Knowles' gold dress for the music of "Sweet Dreams". Jivesh1205 (Talk) 13:54, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
- I got the one for the ring. *weeps* Can you find one for the dress please? Jivesh1205 (Talk) 13:58, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
- Let it be. I got one. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 10:06, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
- Hey sorry for not seeing it before. — Legolas (talk2me) 16:08, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
Madonna Masterpiece
When will Wikipedia produce an article on Madonna's latest song 'Masterpiece'?? I mean, it's already released on itunes for download! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.192.129.106 (talk) 02:52, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
- Ummm untill it passes WP:GNG. — Legolas (talk2me) 16:08, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
A mini-favour
Hi Avi. How's it going? I was wondering if I could possibly ask you a mini-favour. (If you don't have the time or inclination, no worries—maybe I can ask someone else.) Could you look at Tute and tell me if you think the game rules are clear? This is an article I've been reviewing for GA. When I started the review I thought, "This one looks like fun—a card game." But I soon found that the rules were kind of complicated, and I've been getting bogged down on it. (I've been actively trying to help the editor to improve it, which I tend to do—which is usually fun, but in this particular case I have reached my limit on it.) It has definitely become clearer than it was, but I kind of need a set of fresh eyes to judge how clear it is. I'm not asking you to edit it, just say whether you can understand the rules well enough. If you can, I may just pass it. If you can't, I may just fail it. I need to finish off the review and be able to move on to other things. One thing I've learned is that I don't want to ever review card game articles again! :P Moisejp (talk) 17:44, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
- I wil surely look at it Moise. Anything for ya friend. — Legolas (talk2me) 16:08, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
I see your note above as I'm posting this, but the concerns appear to have been addressed three weeks ago and the review looks ready to be closed, so hopefully you can get to this soon. If you're unable to I could wrap it up. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 21:51, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
- No no, I am reviewing it as I type here. — Legolas (talk2me) 16:08, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
—Commander (Ping me) 09:54, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
- Looking. — Legolas (talk2me) 16:08, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
This
is exactly what I mean by your rude, ignorant and sarcastic behaviour. And you really expect to believe what you said in the thread above when you write things like this? Calvin • Watch n' Learn 03:36, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
- LMAO!!! I meant to type "Better late than.." and I missed the word late... And you thought I taunted you? Superb like! — Legolas (talk2me) 16:08, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
- Yeahhh, right. Instead of lying, just be honest. People don't like liars. Calvin • Watch n' Learn 02:36, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
- And you're still here I see. — Legolas (talk2me) 06:25, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
- Yeahhh, right. Instead of lying, just be honest. People don't like liars. Calvin • Watch n' Learn 02:36, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
Copy-edit request (one section only)
Avi, please please please c/e this for me and paraphrase quotes if possible. I did what I could. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 17:45, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
- Avi, you now how tricky it can be at times to write a decent composition section. Please tell me... the step word here, is the the one that concerns walking or this one? I would say it is the walking one but please consult the sources in that section and tell me what you think as you are the only Mr. Know It All who I know. Lol. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 17:57, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
- Its actually talking about this. — Legolas (talk2me) 18:07, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
- Wow, that's damn complicated. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 18:14, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
- Its not that complicated. Basically the piano and the steping up beats is what its talking about. — Legolas (talk2me) 06:26, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
- I have written, The piano work is augmented by handclaps and step sounds provided by a stomp box. Good? Jivesh1205 (Talk) 06:44, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
- Its not that complicated. Basically the piano and the steping up beats is what its talking about. — Legolas (talk2me) 06:26, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
- Wow, that's damn complicated. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 18:14, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
- Its actually talking about this. — Legolas (talk2me) 18:07, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
- (→) No problem dear. — Legolas (talk2me) 08:06, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
- I asked a question. Lol. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 08:09, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
- Oops I missed it. Sorry. I think the correct usage is The piano work is augmented by handclaps and beats provided by a stomp box. That way you dont have to link it to Coltrane. REmember, step sounds are basically beats which occur at pristine progression, the process being helped by the stomp box. Leaving it at just beats allows you not to explain it further. LEt's not bog the section down technically. — Legolas (talk2me) 08:12, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
- Sure. You are genius. :P Jivesh1205 (Talk) 08:18, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
- Temme sumthin new *sips wine* :P — Legolas (talk2me) 08:20, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
- New, well I love you a lot. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 08:25, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
- Temme sumthin new *sips wine* :P — Legolas (talk2me) 08:20, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
- Sure. You are genius. :P Jivesh1205 (Talk) 08:18, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
- Oops I missed it. Sorry. I think the correct usage is The piano work is augmented by handclaps and beats provided by a stomp box. That way you dont have to link it to Coltrane. REmember, step sounds are basically beats which occur at pristine progression, the process being helped by the stomp box. Leaving it at just beats allows you not to explain it further. LEt's not bog the section down technically. — Legolas (talk2me) 08:12, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
- I asked a question. Lol. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 08:09, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
Request for Peer review
Hi, I had listed this article for peer review long back. It is yet to receive any suggestions/improvements. Can you spend sometime reviewing this. —Commander (Ping me) 05:58, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
Welcome to the 2012 WikiCup
Hello, and welcome to the 2012 WikiCup! The competition officially begins at the start of 2012 (UTC) after which time you may begin to claim points. Your submission page, where you must note any content for which you wish to claim points, can be found here, and formatting instructions can be found in hidden comments on the page. A bot will then update the main table, which can be seen on the WikiCup page. The full rules for what will and will not be awarded points can be found at Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring. There's also a section on that page listing the changes that have been made to the rules this year, so that experienced participants can get up-to-date in a few seconds. One point of which we must remind everyone; you may only claim points for content upon which you have done significant work, and which you have nominated, in 2012. For instance, articles written or good article reviews started in 2011 are not eligible for points.
This round will last until late February, and signups will remain open until the middle of February. If you know of anyone who may like to take part, please let them know about the comeptition; the more the merrier! At the end of this round, the top 64 scorers will progress to the next round, where their scores will reset, and they will be split into pools. Note that, by default, you have been added to our newsletter list; we will be in contact at the end of every month with news. You're welcome to remove yourself from this list if you do not wish to hear from us. Conversely, those interested in following the competition are more than welcome to add themselves to the list. Please direct any questions towards the judges, or on the WikiCup talk page. Good luck! J Milburn (talk) and The ed17 (talk) 17:54, 31 December 2011 (UTC)