User talk:Laura P Wright
Welcome!
[edit]
|
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]{{subst:AFC submission/submit}}
to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! - Happysailor (Talk) 12:23, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]{{subst:AFC submission/submit}}
to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Laura P Wright (talk) 15:34, 19 October 2011 (UTC)Thank you for your review of the Smart Inventory Solutions book. I have added additional third-party references, per your suggestion and look forward to your further comments. Best, Laura
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]- Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
Thank you for helping Wikipedia!
Chzz ► 04:40, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of Smart Inventory Solutions for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Smart Inventory Solutions is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smart Inventory Solutions until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Have mörser, will travel (talk) 01:55, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Austin Dog Alliance.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 19:47, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Austin Dog Alliance
[edit]Hello. I am a volunteer for Austin Dog Alliance and created this page with their permission. You commented: "In early 2013, the Alliance will begin offering classes for youth aged 15-19 with disabilities that focus on preparing" => http://austindogalliance.org/ (Entire section is copied literally) "In addition to founding Austin Dog Alliance and leading the growth of the organization as Executive Director" => http://austindogalliance.org/training/our-training-team/ (Entire Leadership section is a very close paraphrase from the website. Lines are either identical or differ one or two words - no change in structure) Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 19:47, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
What evidence do you require to allow me to use this information? Thanks! lpw 20:29, 5 January 2013 (UTC) Laura — Preceding unsigned comment added by Laura P Wright (talk • contribs)
- Hello there Laura,
- Copyright laws don't permit copying content that is marked as being copyrighted directly to Wikipedia(Nor is copying content that isn't specifically marked by a license allowed). Only when content is released specifically under a license allows this (Such as when a page is licensed under CC-BY-SA) it can be copied word for word - in other cases it is a copyright violation. You can, however, use a page as a basis for writing your own text by paraphrasing it. Note that simply changing a word or two is not enough in that case.
- Having said that it is rarely a good idea to use text from an external source directly, as it is rarely written in a way that can be considered encyclopedic. The page you write had the same issue - it was not neutral in several places, and its writing and general structure also had some issues because of that (For example the Leadership section. that took up half the article - this biographical information doesn't belong in a page detailing an organisation).
- What i would advice is gathering reliable sources, and writing an article based on the content of these sources in self-written prose. You may also want to have a look at the Good Article category - the article's in that category and have been checked for their quality, making them excellent examples to model an article after. Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 19:00, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Thank you. I will do that and resubmit later. I appreciate your help. lpw 22:50, 6 January 2013 (UTC) Laura P Wright