Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page Drew Dilkens, may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless used with permission. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:
If you still have questions, there is the Teahouse, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find the pages below to be helpful.
I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 01:04, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Dianna, Thank you for this feedback, would you be able to outline exactly what you removed, so that I may correct accordingly? KyleC199 (talk) 15:10, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 22:10, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Your edit to Drew Dilkens has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 21:00, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Diannaa:
I just made edits to the page. I think it should address your copyright concerns (the plaigarism concerns have already been addressed too).
I would really appreciate if you would stop deleting massive blocks of the page. Instead, could you please point out any specific places on the page you still take issue with? I would be more than happy to address your concerns and make alterations if you did so, rather than just deleting everything point blank. I don't think that serves the page well and it's a slap in the face to all the hard work that I have been doing to make Wikipedia a better place and help Windsor residents stay educated.
I have once again removed copyright content copied from https://www.mayordrewdilkens.ca/bio. Your recent addition has a 90% overlap with that page. Please note that I am under no obligation to re-write the content for you or even to work with you to edit it. I also note your multiple attempts to remove sourced criticism of Dilkens from the article. That's not okay.This is your final warning. Further violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy will result in you being blocked from editing. — Diannaa (talk) 19:13, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Respectfully, Diannaa, you're claim that what I have inserted has a 90% overlap with the Mayor's website is factually incorrect. In fact, I rewrote everything.
I am more than happy to leave criticism in the article. I'm just as critical of politicians as the next guy is. That being said, the places in which you have inserted the criticism don't make sense, and since you have no regard for the time I put into the site, I have no regard for yours, either. KyleC199 (talk) 19:29, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Diannaa. This report is helpful for me to view to make sure I can learn from my mistakes and write better.
I just made some more changes to the page, however, only a few; I want to take some time to re-look over other parts. So, I am editing in pieces now.
I added the COVID-19 section back and changed everything so it is in my own words. I also agree that the Bright Lights criticism should not have been removed. In fact, I have actually expanded on that now, and it is included under Road Infrastructure and Flooding section. I think now there is more context in that paragraph.
Please let me know if there are any issues. I am actively trying to play by the rules here. Hopefully, we can work together collaboratively and peacefully. KyleC199 (talk) 13:49, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This is very disappointing, and I think, uncalled for given by recent efforts to be diplomatic. Could you please explain what in my recent edits warranted this? KyleC199 (talk) 13:52, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I have blocked your account, because in spite of repeated warnings, you continued to add copyright material to Wikipedia in violation of our copyright policy. You cannot resume editing until you provide a statement describing how copyright applies to Wikipedia, show that you understand our copyright policy, and make a commitment to follow it in the future. — Diannaa (talk) 14:40, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, KyleC199. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Drew Dilkens, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
Your edit to Drew Dilkens has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 21:00, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
