User talk:Koeho
Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- How to edit a page
- Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Manual of Style
- If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Wikipedia:Topical index.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! - UtherSRG 19:59, Apr 9, 2005 (UTC)
The UT Template was a great idea and it looks really good too.
--Nyr14 03:57, July 12, 2005 (UTC)
It appears User:Nightstallion reverted your edit. The statistics are that 1 in 3 Canadians support Canadian membership. True there are U.S.Americans that support the EU I don't believe that it could be the US could anywhere as high (possible even drowned out by the anti-Euros.) However every little helps and I thank you for your suppport.
Thank you for your proposing a move at WP:RM. Please place a discussion area in Talk:Cyprus so that other users can express their views on your proposed move. Instructions for inserting such area can be found here. Best regards. --Húsönd 14:27, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
- Hi there. Thank you for replying to my comment. I am however afraid that the discussion area on Talk:Cyprus still does not correspond to what users will look for in order to express their opinions. See this one for example. You may insert a discussion area such as that one by placing the following:
==Requested move==
PageName → NewName – {reason for move with signature}
===Survey===
Add "* Support" or "* Oppose" followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>
===Discussion===
Add any additional comments
- Just replace "PageName" with the current name, "NewName" with the name you suggest, and add your reason. Users will then state their opinions. I will actually oppose this move, but I wish you good luck. :-) Best regards.--Húsönd 19:54, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, it's much better now. Sorry for my oppose vote. Best regards.--Húsönd 20:20, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
Regarding Presidential "Exploratory Committees"
[edit]You're invited to comment at Template talk:United States presidential election, 2008 navigation, on this proposal:
And please note this argument on the same talk page. Exploratory equals Candidate.
- Best regards, -- Yellowdesk 13:54, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:2007 CONCACAF Gold Cup Logo.png, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:2007 CONCACAF Gold Cup Logo.png fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:2007 CONCACAF Gold Cup Logo.png, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:2007 CONCACAF Gold Cup Logo.png itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 06:04, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:2007 CONCACAF Gold Cup Logo.png}
[edit]Thank you for uploading Image:2007 CONCACAF Gold Cup Logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
- That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.
Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 21:15, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Logo UTB-TSC.png
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Logo UTB-TSC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:12, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
