User talk:Kulcat

IEC on Wikipedia

I suspect that you'd be interested in improving the coverage of the IEC on Wikipedia. Fundamentally, the way to do this is to allow some access to the IEC standards, so that Wikipedia users might summarize them and create properly referenced articles. Right now, because the standards are unavailable, the quality of many IEC (and other standards-body-related) articles is pretty dismal. There's hardly any referencing of facts, and the articles are just a piecemeal of anecdotes collected by various people during the course of their professional activities.

So, I'd be interested in working to improve these articles, if you can provide access to the appropriate primary source documentation (the standards). Now, while you could theoretically do this yourself, you've identified yourself as having a potential conflict of interest (because you represent an agency covered by these articles)—so it would be preferable if a neutral editor did this instead.

Please feel free to respond and ask any questions on this talk page. TheFeds 17:44, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

By the way; see WP:NOSHARE, if multiple people are using this account, and WP:ORGNAME regarding the use of "IEC Central Office" as a username. (Both aren't really permissible; I'll assist you with resolving those issues, if you desire.) TheFeds 17:47, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please look at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. Promotion of sales of your organization's products on the Wikipedia is not acceptable. --Wtshymanski (talk) 18:05, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]