User talk:Krishna.cell

This is Krishna.cell's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: YMCA Framework (November 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:YMCA Framework and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 13:13, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Krishna.cell! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hitro talk 13:13, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Hitro,

Thank you for reaching out and providing guidance regarding the article draft process. I appreciate the suggestions to visit the Articles for Creation help desk and the Teahouse for further assistance.

This article represents a new concept or thought, and I’m unsure how to navigate the approval process effectively. I’d greatly appreciate any clarification or help in getting it approved. Since this is an initial idea, I’m open to refining and improving it based on feedback.

Thank you for your time and support!

Best Regards

Krishna Reddy Krishna.cell (talk) 14:43, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: YMCA Framework (November 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Qcne were:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:YMCA Framework and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

qcne (talk) 16:12, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: YMCA Framework (November 17)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Qcne was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Wikipedia does not host "new concepts".

qcne (talk) 16:16, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: YMCA Framework (November 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by I dream of horses was:

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Hard to understand, and the citations aren’t formatted correctly.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:YMCA Framework and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 16:26, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: YMCA Framework (November 17)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Qcne was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: You are now becoming disruptive.

qcne (talk) 16:56, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Krishna.cell Stop re-submitting this draft. A rejection means it will not be considered further. qcne (talk) 16:57, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Qcne Thank you for your feedback and clarification regarding the rejection of my draft. I understand that a rejection means it will not be reconsidered in its current form. However, I would appreciate any specific guidance on how I could refine or improve the content to meet Wikipedia’s standards in the future. My intention was to contribute meaningfully to the platform, and I am eager to learn and make adjustments if possible.

If the topic is deemed inherently unsuitable for Wikipedia, I would appreciate confirmation so I can redirect my efforts elsewhere. Thank you for your time and patience. Krishna.cell (talk) 17:04, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Krishna.cell The topic is inherently not notable. You have two fake sources (Jane Doe, and John Smith), which leads me to believe you are using an AI chatbot to write the draft and replies. qcne (talk) 17:05, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Qcne, holy shit, I didn't even notice that. Thanks. Krishna, I'm starting to think you are purposely wasting our time. Drmies (talk) 17:09, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The URLs are made up too, so I think its an AI hallucination. qcne (talk) 17:14, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

you are correct of using AI bot for refrence Krishna.cell (talk) 17:25, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We post articles on topics that have proper secondary sourcing that prove they are notable. What you have proposed looks like something you wrote up yourself, based on your own work, and the three articles you offer don't seem to discuss the actual topic of the article, but rather aspects of the thinking that led to it. Besides, the links you give are all faulty: one goes to the website of a journal, and the other two are simply dead. Drmies (talk) 17:08, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 01:15, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]