User talk:KillingKiddo

December 2018

Hello, I'm Acroterion. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Miley Cyrus, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Acroterion (talk) 04:28, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Jonathan Taylor Thomas. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 03:10, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Where did I provide poor information on Jonathan's page?! It's all true. Do some research yourself. KillingKiddo (talk) 21:14, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The burden is on you to provide reliable sources for material you add. That's why I have removed much of the material you (re-)added to Thomas's page today. —C.Fred (talk) 22:05, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The burden of proof? Look at other celebrities profiles. What other proof did YOU need? Because all of my information comes from over TWO decades of being a Weiss/Thomas fan. All from HIS own lips. So either it's not good enough for you or Weiss/Thomas is lying. KillingKiddo (talk) 23:46, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you review WP:RS. "He said it" isn't good enough for publication here. DonIago (talk) 14:53, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

So are you saying the Emails and notifications I get from Wikipedia are BS? Are you saying my facts aren't facts? From my POV it's all according to YOUR rules! And you do not own nor run Wikipedia. And because of your sour, bitter and lack of guidance attitude is just going to scare people like me away over time. Than who is gonna donate to keep Wikipedia alive? The people you demeaned? No. And thanks to actors like Kevin Smith - more will flock to IMDB - thanks to jerks like you. KillingKiddo (talk) 20:12, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

When you show more interest in being civil I'll be happy to discuss this with you. In the meantime you should review WP:RS. No, emails and notifications you get from Wikipedia aren't reliable sources. DonIago (talk) 01:09, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is ALL on Wikipedia! Fans and/or admires are the ones who submit facts. Seriously. Another person, like you, controls Miley Cyrus' page and didnt want "negative" things of ANY kind on there. She said she controlled it and only wanted positive things on there since Miley is and promotes "positive" (and that was after I read the WP:RS) And I have been civil. I'm not in control of people who appear to be control freaks over celebrity information and/or fun facts just because they didnt "make it" in the world. It's like fighting for the front seat in the short bus.....and I CAN day that. My brother is mentally disabled with a stellar sense of humor. So enjoy whatever "this" is all you want. I'm done. KillingKiddo (talk) 02:54, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Tyler Henry, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 05:37, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is reliable. It's on his Official IG. Without sounding like a *nickname for richard* please tell me how I should've done it. I'm still leaning how WiKi works and I want to do it right. KillingKiddo (talk) 05:40, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:BURDEN. You must provide citations of reliable sources for any content that you add that is likely to be challenged, especially if it involves the biography of a living person. If you do not do so, the content you add can and should be removed, and if you persistently do so you can be blocked from editing. Merely saying "it's reliable" does not make it verifiable. Most of this is already stated (and the policies linked) in the message I left on your Talk page, and I note that this is not your first warning concerning this issue. General Ization ^Talk 06:17, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]