User talk:Khalid Latouf
January 2018
[edit] | This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page. |
Dear Admin, a bot is now attacking my reasonable edits on the 'Maram Susli' page. I have been reverting 'JJMC89's repeated deletions of my edits. How can I stop these constant reversions?
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Maram Susli has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Maram Susli was changed by Khalid Latouf (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.91669 on 2018-01-20T10:07:09+00:00 .
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:07, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
- You can't stop a bot from operating. But it seems that it's not just the bot, but another editor who also has a problem with your edits. By the edit summaries of the other editor, it looks like you are using Daily Mail as a source, which Wikipedia does not consider a reliable source. You are welcome to inquire about this at WP:ANI. Please provide links if you ask about this at ANI. — Maile (talk) 16:05, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
Susli
[edit]
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.The Daily Mail is not a reliable source, especially for facts about living people. Also, the lead should summarize the article, not cover information not presented elsewhere in the article. — JJMC89 (T·C) 18:08, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
BLPs
[edit]This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.