User talk:Kentexplorer

Welcome!

Hello, Kentexplorer, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Explore kent, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Ironholds (talk) 09:55, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Explore kent

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Explore kent, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

non-notable brand; article written as a guide rather than a neutral encyclopedic page

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Ironholds (talk) 09:55, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Ironholds. A brief mention in the KCC article is all that this subject needs. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 16:08, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted promotional links

I see you spent 4 hours this morning trying to promote KCC. This raises many interesting issues.

Your web site is a nice piece of PR conforming with KCC standards, but like a lot of material produced by KCC omits any useful information. For someone wanting to take a day out, there is not enough detail- it promotes the concept but fails to help the activity. Your budget I presume is justified as it is part of a Health promotion initiative but fails actually to give the information needed to get one obese soul onto the footpath network.
For a comparison see the detail achieved in Stour Valley Walk. Wikipedia is published under a Creative Commons licence- ie you are free to transclude text into you website if the text is attributed. It would be helpful if you and KCC reciprocated, and allowed other free use of your text.
Particularly KCC has copyright ownership of many images that could be donated to Wikipedia commons in the same way the German Government and the US government has. I am particularly interested in the free right to use various logos such as the logo on the Stour Valley Walk sign.
Please don't do this quietly- Britains largest authority give wikipedia the right to use all its images is a story of worldwide importance- a PR coup.
If you have time on you hands- all the Kent walk pages can do with improving.
Look out for some of the Kent images I have placed on Commons- some are already being used by government departments in their brochures- they may be useful to your boss, and they are of course CC-BY and royalty free.

In the meantime the site doesn't give enough page specific information to warrant the links. --ClemRutter (talk) 19:02, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Explore Kent, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam); and,
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. --Orange Mike | Talk 14:10, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Explore Kent

I have nominated Explore Kent, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Explore Kent. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. - Dan Dank55 (push to talk) 19:23, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

April 2009

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia, because it has been identified as an account used for promotion of a company or group, with a username that implies that this has been done by that company or group. See Wikipedia:FAQ/Organization and Wikipedia:Conflict of interest.

This kind of activity is considered spamming and forbidden by policies, and also violates our username policy.

However, if you feel that there has been a mistake in your blocking, please appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below or email the administrator who blocked you. Your reason should include your response to this issue and a new username you wish to adopt that does not violate our username policy (specifically, understand that accounts are for individuals, not companies or groups, and that your username should reflect this). Please check that your new username has not already been taken by checking this list. Mfield (Oi!) 21:22, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]