User talk:Kekemato99

August 2012

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to B.A.P. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 02:47, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Daehyun. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 02:48, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at B.A.P shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 02:50, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at B.A.P, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 02:50, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unreliable source

http://exo-bap.tumblr.com/post/22322425492/who-else-thought-daehyun-was-the-visual-of-the is an unreliable source. Please stop adding this information or you will be reported for vandalism. Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 02:59, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

AIV report

You have been reported to Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism due to your disruptive edits and edit-warring. Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 03:46, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator's warning

Hi. I am an administrator who has been asked to review your account for possible blocking. I see that you seem to be engaged in an editing dispute with other editors.

Please make no further edits to any Wikipedia articles for now without first gaining consensus for them on the article talk pages (such as Talk:B.A.P) from other, established editors. Otherwise, I or another administrator may block this account without further warning.

Thank you, --A. B. ^{(talk • contribs)} 03:51, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing, as you did at B.A.P. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. A. B. ^{(talk • contribs)} 03:59, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment for other administrators: if this person repeats this disruptive editing after the current one-week block expires, I recommend blocking this account indefinitely as a vandalism-only account. --A. B. ^{(talk • contribs)} 04:03, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]