User talk:Katsumasahiro2

Please leave this page alone

I am waiting to be unblocked. Please stop deleting this page, it doesn't affect you. This is not "long term storage" of anything. --Katsumasahiro2 (talk) 19:51, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

leukemia page.

http://www.medindia.net/news/Wonder-drug-Dasatinib-gives-hopes-to-leukemia-patients-6280-1.htm

Gleevac "But with this drug some patients (20% of CML) did not respond to the drug or initially responded but later became resistant to the drug."

Dasatinib "The mechanism of the drug action is that it attacks and prevents several proteins (BCR-ABL & SRC) in the same time. SRC is believed to help the leukemia cells to take the alternate pathway and become resistant to Gleevec, but Dasatinib prevents the action of SRC."

Talpaz M, Shah NP, Kantarjian H, et al. (June 2006). "Dasatinib in imatinib-resistant Philadelphia chromosome-positive leukemias". N. Engl. J. Med. 354 (24): 2531–41. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa055229. PMID

http://packageinserts.bms.com/pi/pi_sprycel.pdf

May 26, 2009 FDA Grants Full Approval for SPRYCEL® (dasatinib) for the Treatment of Adults with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Who Are Resistant or Intolerant to Prior Therapies Including Gleevec®*

http://www.bms.com/news/press_releases/pages/default.aspx?RSSLink=http://www.businesswire.com/news/bms/20090526006116/en&t=633772913884877820

nothing new

---

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pain_(philosophy)

Wittgenstein's beetle http://www.philosophyonline.co.uk/pom/pom_behaviourism_wittgenstein.htm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Out_of_body_experience

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entheogen

astral projection with no return?

wayfaring, forced shifting

alternate realities, creation through thought

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maya_(illusion)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shamanism

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shapeshifting

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cone_of_power

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transcendence_(religion)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Wayfarer_(Kojin)

Forced Shift

Forced shifting is the focused employment of conscious thought to create an alternate reality and then project astrally into that reality. The concept was developed by Kei Masahiro, a little-known Japanese-American "janitor-philosopher" from Cambridge, Massachusetts. Masahiro, who disappeared from his night rounds in the Fall of 1999, left behind a journal which logged his own experiments with forced shifting. Discovered by his brother in 2008, the journal is to be released to the public before the end of 2009. His brother, originally skeptical of the theory of forced shifting, revisited the concept after receiving a terminal diagnosis of cancer in 2009, and decided to continue the experiments began by Kei Masahiro. Inspired by the fictional worlds created by Kira Takenouchi, Masahiro sought to recreate Atlantis, which

how to confirm,..............

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Katsumasahiro2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I don't know how to do this, but I CAN'T SIGN INTO MY OTHER ACCOUNT. This isn't sock puppetry! That would be someone who signed on with a different name pretending to be someone else! Please unblock this account, I'm trying to update a page! can't sign in with my other account, I forget the password. I made my name OBVIOUS that it was me katsumasahiro, please unblock! And then the person who blocked me, Verygeeky or whoever, has it so I can't contact him, which is downright rude.

Decline reason:

Regardless of whether or not you can remember your prior password, your prior account was blocked for making legal threats: [1], edit warring, sock puppetry, personal attacks, and general incivility. If you wish to be unblocked, you need to convince Wikipedia administrators that these behaviors are not going to continue. You may, of course, use this account as your primary account if you choose, but you may NOT continue to edit while one of your accounts is blocked. Please request an unblock by following the guidelines as spelled out at WP:GAB and convince admins that you will stop the behavior that led to the block on your other account.--Jayron32 02:36, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{unblock|I am not intentionally using multiple accounts but I can't log into Katsumasahiro. Therefore I created a new account with a virtually identical name so it would be CLEAR this was me precisely to avoid such a reaction. I find it surprising you blocked me the instant I appeared on this page and yet now have conveniently disappeared. That's mean.}}

You have three separate unblock requests on this page; this is ridiculous. You need to consolidate them into one request and delete the other two before anyone will consider them. Exploding Boy (talk) 01:49, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Is this right? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Katsumasahiro2 (talk • contribs)

Yes. Now you have to wait for the request to be reviewed. This may take a some time, so I suggest you go and do something else for a while. Exploding Boy (talk) 01:54, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

I'll wait. I've already waited 24 hours, you guys can't really be that sadistic.--Katsumasahiro2 (talk) 01:57, 7 August 2009 (UTC)Katsumasahiro2

It's not about sadism. The simple fact is that we're all volunteers, and not every admin watches the unblock requests page. Patience. Exploding Boy (talk) 01:58, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

I find it very interesting, then, that VeryGeeky lept onto me after I had been online less than 3 minutes and then conveniently disappeared. So your suggestion that you're all busy is a bunch of crap. You blocked me the moment I came back online.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Katsumashiro2 (talk • contribs)

You're not helping your case by being rude. While you're waiting you may wish to read the ANI thread about you here. Exploding Boy (talk) 02:01, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

I think I'll pass, since you all are just trying to fuck with me yet again. Look, I'm not trying to be rude, but from day one you all have been nothing but extremely rude and insulting to me, accusing me of creating bogus references and generally making me feel like a worthless piece of crap. So yes, you've made me very angry, and yes, I probably do sound abrupt, but it's only because NOT ONE SINGLE PERSON has been at all courteous to me, except perhaps the marianne person from that yaoi page.--Katsumasahiro2 (talk) 02:04, 7 August 2009 (UTC)Katsumasahiro2 (talk) 02:02, 7 August 2009 (UTC)Katsumasahiro

Really? I don't believe I've interacted with you at all prior to a few minutes ago, and I'm fairly sure I've been courteous. However, it's certainly your prerogative if you feel you must abandon Wikipedia. Exploding Boy (talk) 02:06, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

The first thing you said to me was "You have three separate unblock requests on this page; this is ridiculous." That's not rude? VersiGeek or whoever blocked me THE MINUTE I came online and then disappeared. That's not rude? --Katsumasahiro2 (talk) 02:19, 7 August 2009 (UTC)Katsumasahiro2

Okay I am going to have to override you people and find someone to report this to. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Katsumasahiro2 (talk • contribs)

First, would you please sign your posts by typing four tildes (~) at the end. Second, you could trying appealing to the Arbitration Committee, but given your history, honestly it's unlikely to work since you have thus far failed to convince anyone that the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption (i.e., that the block violates our blocking policy) or that the block is no longer necessary because you understand what you are blocked for, you will not do it again and you will make productive contributions instead. If you're actually serious about wanting to contribute usefully, you should really read WP:AAB and WP:GAB to get more information on the unblock appeal process. Exploding Boy (talk) 02:34, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Clearing an autoblock

Due to the nature of the block applied we need additional information before we can decide whether to unblock you. It is very likely that you are not personally blocked. If you are prevented from editing, it may be because you are autoblocked or blocked because of your IP address. Without further details there is nothing further we can do to review or lift your block. Please follow these instructions:

1. If you have a Wikipedia account, please ensure that you are logged in.
   Your account name will be visible in the top right of this page if you are.
   If it isn't, try bypassing your web browser's cache.
2. Try to edit the Sandbox.
3. If you are still blocked, copy the {{unblock-auto|...}} code generated for you under the "IP blocked?" section. This is usually hidden within the "What do I do now?" section. If so, just click the "[show]" link to the right hand side to show this text.
4. Paste the code at the bottom of your user talk page and click save.

If you are not blocked from editing the sandbox then the autoblock on your IP address has already expired and you can resume editing. —C.Fred (talk) 02:53, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Has Yaoi Press written about KT?

Has Yaoi Press written anything about KT? I've looked on their website and can't find anything... :( --Malkinann (talk) 02:25, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

I don't know. My point about Yaoi Press was simply that, a previous poster had claimed the entities/websites listed at Yaoi World were "not notable". That would included Yaoi Press and Tina Anderson. My point was that they ARE notable, Yaoi Press and Tina Anderson are both listed here at Wikipedia as notable, so his assertion that those were "personal websites of no repute" was false.--Katsumasahiro2 (talk) 02:32, 7 August 2009 (UTC)Katsumasahiro2

Thank you for treating me like a human being. I appreciate it. The reason I wanted to log in was I have some new research I wanted to post. I don't know if it will do any good but I wanted to at least try. --Katsumasahiro2 (talk) 02:34, 7 August 2009 (UTC)Katsumasahiro

Cool! Tell me more about your new research - I hope it meets the reliable sources guideline. If you could please look on Yaoi Press's site to try to find stuff about KT, I can add it to the article. --Malkinann (talk) 02:40, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

The kind of research we're looking for is a few reliable sources saying why and how KT is important to yaoi, or evidence that she's won a major literary award. Male homosexuality in Japan does not mention KT, nor does Lunsing's paper. John Ratey's paper also does not mention her. --Malkinann (talk) 02:50, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

We have a notable reference, but you refuse to accept it, for some reason.--Katsumasahiro2 (talk) 03:09, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Being notable, as in being worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, and being reliable, as in a trustworthy, reputable source of information, are two different things. The reliability of Yaoi World cannot be assessed against the reliable source guideline at this time as it is unpublished. Until we can adequately determine its reliability, we cannot accept it as a reference. --Malkinann (talk) 03:12, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

You're saying even though the website already states she's received this honor, as well as listing the other yaoi authors and artists who were selected for that issue, that this is isn't reliable until they actually post the issue? --Katsumasahiro2 (talk) 03:15, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

It isn't considered reliable until we can determine how trustworthy Yaoi World is. The guidelines for determining this are available on the reliable source guideline (which I linked you to above). --Malkinann (talk) 03:18, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Part of the problem is that Yaoi World has yet to publish a single issue. If they had been around a while, we could evaluate the announcement against their track record: editorial policy, fact-checking, research, etc. Because they haven't published, there are no articles to evaluate, so we can't assess their reliability. —C.Fred (talk) 03:22, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

By the way, Yaoi Press and these other yaoi sites are all yaoi MANGA sites. Kira Takenouchi was the first author to publish yaoi literary NOVELS, that is, without illustrations. So talking to these manga yaoi companies is pointless. Kira created a whole new genre. What she did had never been done before. --Katsumasahiro2 (talk) 03:20, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

So show me a reliable source that says this - if so, that could pass WP:CREATIVE (part of the notability guidelines) as 'originating a new innovation'. --Malkinann (talk) 03:22, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

There IS no reliable source because it's never been done before! Look at any yaoi title out there. It's manga. --Katsumasahiro2 (talk) 03:24, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

At least, I should add...as far as I know, in the US. Not sure about other countries. That is why she is a "pioneer" of American yaoi. --Katsumasahiro2 (talk) 03:26, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

But how do we know she's a pioneer of American yaoi? Who says she is? —C.Fred (talk) 03:29, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

As far as I know, there are no other yaoi novelists in America. There are yaoi writers--that is, they write the text of yaoi manga--but not yaoi novels with long narrative, complex plots, characterization, etc. These are novels like any other novels, the only difference is there's a lot graphic yaoi sex. It's Yutaka Takehiko of Yaoi World who first called her a pioneer, but you all won't accept him as reliable. So you're saying we have to wait around until some other reliable source notices that Kira created something new before Wikipedia would acknowledge it? --Katsumasahiro2 (talk) 03:35, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Yes. When a few such sources talk about Takenouchi's contribution to the genre, we can even have a Wikipedia article just for her, without the danger of it being deleted. --Malkinann (talk) 03:38, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

I see but...there IS no other reliable source in the genre, because Kira created it. So there's no one to notice what she's done. --Katsumasahiro2 (talk) 03:45, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

That's correct. Seb az86556 (talk) 03:46, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

So, therefore...she can never be acknowledged, unless folks who follow in her footsteps admit she was the first. --Katsumasahiro2 (talk) 03:50, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

No, not exactly. If someone uninvolved makes that statement. Basically, you're trying to write about Picasso after his first painting. Seb az86556 (talk) 03:53, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

If one (or more) of her novels wins a decent-sized literary award, or if people write academic journal articles about her work, that's another way she could be shown to be notable. Yaoi is a curiosity among academics - it's not such a pipe dream. --Malkinann (talk) 03:55, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

These are all Kira's novels:

[2] --Katsumasahiro2 (talk) 03:41, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

As OpenLibrary can be edited by anyone, like Wikipedia can, we can't use it as a reliable source. --Malkinann (talk) 03:43, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

That wasn't meant to be a source, I'm just showing you her titles. She has these in various stages on her website. We're not talking about just ONE novel here. --Katsumasahiro2 (talk) 03:45, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Ok, cool. Most of those are forthcoming? --Malkinann (talk) 03:55, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Two I know of are published already, the others are in various stages, many are close to publication (and can be read on her website). I'm not sure what to think about those publication dates and am not sure they are accurate. But as you can see the cover art is already completed. --Katsumasahiro2 (talk) 04:02, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

So why not sit back and wait until they are completed? Seb az86556 (talk) 04:08, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

I don't know why I'm even bothering with all this, maybe because I already have so much time invested. Kira apparently doesn't even care whether she's in Wikipedia or not and she actually reprimanded me for my behavior here when my email sent her to this board. It's just I've never known anyone famous before, and I know she may not be famous YET to some people, but she WILL be, to everyone one day, and I want to be part of it. I haven't actually met her but I feel like I know her because I read her blog and am part of her Facebook group. She has nearly 800 friends on FB. Only I'm going to be mad if someone else gets to write the article that "sticks" and it's not me. I guess I'll see you all around. --Katsumasahiro2 (talk) 04:09, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Would be nice if you at least added all this to the deletion discussion, since you've prevented me from making a contribution there. --Katsumasahiro2 (talk) 04:25, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Since you are clearly determined to delete Kira's article, could someone please save on the deletion log page that Katsu Masahiro worked on the page? Is that possible to include in the KT article if it ever comes back up? I know Kira Takenouchi will be back on Wikipedia again eventually, so that when that happens maybe someone will give me some credit for working on it, though I doubt it. I won't likely see that day since I have stage 4 cancer, this is just something I was doing to try and block out the pain. I love Kira Takenouchi. Her stories are the only thing that get me through these days. Sorry I was so rude with everyone but I feel like crap, and having my edits thwarted were more than I could take. --Katsumasahiro2 (talk) 04:55, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Please do not remove prior unblock requests

As instructed in the unblock request template, please do not remove prior declined requests. You may make a new request, but you must leave all declined requests visible until you have been unblocked, so that all admins who respond may review the situation. I have returned your prior declined requests...--Jayron32 02:36, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

What? I never received a decline? --Katsumasahiro2 (talk) 02:39, 7 August 2009 (UTC)Katsumasahiro

I declined your unblock request at 2:14, see [3]. You then deleted my decline at 2:16. See [4]. Please do not do this. --Jayron32 02:47, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

I didn't mean to. I was just trying to post here since I have no where else to post. Why did you decline me?? --Katsumasahiro2 (talk) 02:48, 7 August 2009 (UTC)Katsumasahiro2

Please read above for my response. --Jayron32 02:49, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

I don't see anything? Did you unblock me yet? --Katsumasahiro2 (talk) 03:12, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

You blocked me for having multiple accounts, which was clearly unfair, because I cannot access the first account but took pains to make it clear WHO I was. If I wanted to sign on and pretend to be someone else, I would have used a completely different name, not the same name. I cannot retrieve my password because my email is not confirmed. So you blocked me unfairly, but the reason you gave for blocking me was a lie. You abused the block. Now you say it's for other reasons. Really you are trying to prevent me from contributing to the discussion on delete, that is why you have blocked me. --Katsumasahiro2 (talk) 04:29, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

{{unblock|The reason give for this block is: Abusing multiple accounts: checkuser block. This is clearly FALSE. I could not sign on with Katsumasahiro so I created a new account, Katsumasahiro2. Why would I create a virtually identical account to be a sock puppet? So I was NOT abusing. You are abusing the block by intentionally blocking me just because you don't like me. You then declined my request to unblock and gave completely new reasons, but the reasons you gave were the SAME exact things all of you have been doing to me, reverting all my edits, being uncivil, insulting me directly and by accusing me FALSELY of sock puppetry (which still irks me), calling the entry on Kira Takenouchi, a great writer, "spam", etc. I agree to play nice, but will you? You all make such a fuss about notability. Let me tell you something, I will never be notable for anything. The reason I care about this entry is I KNOW Kira Takenouchi is notable, and so do a lot of others, she is destined for even greater fame, too. Having a chance to work on her bio is probably the closest I'll ever get to being notable. There are thousands upon thousands of articles here on Wiki that need reliable sources, but they are not deleted. You have honed in on this entry for no good reason, chopped it down until it's a stump, and are prepared to delete it. You should apply the same scrutiny to all the other crap that's here on Wikipedia.}}

I still can't log in. I have been waiting for hours to be unblocked. I can't use my Katsumasahiro account because I can't retrieve my password. When I try, all I get is: Login error Your IP address is blocked from editing, and so is not allowed to use the password recovery function to prevent abuse. --Katsumasahiro2 (talk) 07:18, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Clearing an autoblock

Due to the nature of the block applied we need additional information before we can decide whether to unblock you. It is very likely that you are not personally blocked. If you are prevented from editing, it may be because you are autoblocked or blocked because of your IP address. Without further details there is nothing further we can do to review or lift your block. Please follow these instructions:

1. If you have a Wikipedia account, please ensure that you are logged in.
   Your account name will be visible in the top right of this page if you are.
   If it isn't, try bypassing your web browser's cache.
2. Try to edit the Sandbox.
3. If you are still blocked, copy the {{unblock-auto|...}} code generated for you under the "IP blocked?" section. This is usually hidden within the "What do I do now?" section. If so, just click the "[show]" link to the right hand side to show this text.
4. Paste the code at the bottom of your user talk page and click save.

If you are not blocked from editing the sandbox then the autoblock on your IP address has already expired and you can resume editing. --Closedmouth (talk) 10:47, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Can't edit in the sandbox. I've been blocked, as I've told you all a thousand times. --Katsumasahiro2 (talk) 19:48, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Then is there a particular reason why you won't move to step 3? --Smashville^talk 20:52, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Storing deleted content on your userpages

Please do not use your user space to maintain deleted materials. Please see WP:UP#COPIES: "While userpages and subpages can be used as a development ground for generating new content, [they are] not intended to indefinitely archive . . . previously deleted content or indefinitely archive permanent content that is meant to be part of the encyclopedia. In other words, Wikipedia is not a free web host. Private copies of pages that are being used solely for long-term archival purposes may be subject to deletion." Thanks. Exploding Boy (talk) 19:41, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

This isn't being used for "long-term" archival purposes. I can't even edit in the sandbox, this is the ONLY place I can edit. This is "short-term." You people just can't stop fucking with me can you? --Katsumasahiro2 (talk) 19:47, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

You can maintain the article in a file on your computer; you cannot store deleted materials in your user space in order to circumvent an AFD (Article For Deletion) decision or discussion. Also, I strongly suggest you review our civility policy. Exploding Boy (talk) 19:50, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

I am not CIRCUMVENTING anything, I'm trying to get my references to work properly. --Katsumasahiro2 (talk) 19:52, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

"Private copies of pages that are being used solely for long-term archival purposes may be subject to deletion." That doesn't apply here, does it? If this had been sitting here for years I would understand your objection. You are obsessed with everything I do. I can't even try to edit my article to make it work on Wikipedia, here in a place where NO ONE will ever find it, for five minutes without one of you coming here trying to throw some grand regulation at me. Then you have the audacity to lecture me about being civil. Try looking in the mirror. --Katsumasahiro2 (talk) 19:56, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Fine. I'm not getting into an edit war with you over this. I have removed the categories because it is not permitted to categorize user pages in the same categories as articles. However, I can't guarantee that another user won't delete the content, especially since the current consensus in the deletion discussion is to delete the article. I am currently trying to find out what's happening with your block, but as I've told you before, incivility will not help your case. Exploding Boy (talk) 20:00, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but I am not being unreasonable by editing on my user page, which is allowed on Wikipedia. All I want to do is be the one to finally post an article on Takenouchi that sticks. Everything on this page is true, all I have to do is find the references to prove it. I've already decided to write her biography and my friends are going to help me form the company to publish it. You all just don't get it, you take everything for granted. You block me for 24 hours. For me that is like blocking me for a year. For me there is no time left. --Katsumasahiro2 (talk) 20:14, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

It's hard not to be uncivil when you're attacked for everything you do. Do you have any idea what it's like to be in so much pain you have to just scream every once in awhile? I find ONE task to occupy me, ONE small thing to try and distract me from this agony, and I'm met with resistance every step of the way. In God's name I beg you all, leave me in peace. I won't be here much longer. --Katsumasahiro2 (talk) 20:17, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

If someone could just remove this block, all I freaking want to do is update the page on leukemia about Dasatinib. --Katsumasahiro2 (talk) 20:20, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

As I've told you, your situation is complicated because this account hasn't actually been blocked and the block on your other account has now expired; I'm working on trying to figure it out, but as I told you before, these things take time. I'm sorry if you're having problems in your life that are making things hard for you, and it may seem as though our policies are unfair, but you really are going to have to try to find a way to be patient and remain civil because, as I keep explaining, it will have a bearing on whether you are ultimately permitted to start editing again. In the meantime, if it is particularly important to you to get the information on Takenouchi out there immediately, you could always find a free webhost. Exploding Boy (talk) 20:28, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Your block

When you try to edit anything besides this talk page, do you get an autoblocked user template message? Or any message? If so, what does it say? Exploding Boy (talk) 20:45, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Question

Your original account wasn't blocked with the message you are cutting and pasting here. Clearly, that is the message being given to you in the autoblock template. What account is it saying you are an alternate user of? --Smashville^talk 20:58, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

It says:

Secure login

You are currently unable to edit pages on Wikipedia.

You can still read pages, but you cannot edit, change, or create them.

Editing from [IP] (your account, IP address, or IP address range) has been disabled by Versageek for the following reason(s):

Abusing multiple accounts: checkuser block

This block has been set to expire: 00:21, 7 September 2009.

Even if blocked, you will usually still be able to edit your user talk page and contact other editors and administrators by e-mail.

Note: If you have JavaScript enabled, please use the [show] links across from each header to show more information. --Katsumasahiro2 (talk) 01:22, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

If it's a checkuser block, that suggests that the IP you're using has been associated with someone who has been abusing multiple accounts.

As I see it, you have only one real option at this point, which is to follow the "Clearing an autoblock" instructions which have already been posted to your page twice.

Without further details there is nothing further we can do to review or lift your block. Please follow these instructions:

1. Ensuring that you are logged in, try editing the Sandbox.

2. If you are still blocked, copy the {{unblock-auto}} code generated for you under the "IP blocked?" section. This is usually hidden within the "What do I do now?" section. If so, just click the "[show]" link to the right hand side to show this text.

3. Paste the code at the bottom of your user talk page and click save.

Thanks. Exploding Boy (talk) 01:50, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

Biographies of living persons policy

Your proposed biography of Kira Takenouchi (for Wikipedia, the one you've been working on here) is not acceptable under our Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons policy. In order to protect the living subjects of a biography on Wikipedia, we absolutely must get it right - anything that is contentious and not sourced to reliable sources must go - it is considered better to have a barebones article or no article at all rather than a contentious, poorly sourced article. This applies regardless of whether the content is in an article, or in a testing ground, such as your user talk page. Please read the biographies of living persons policy carefully - this is to protect Kira Takenouchi. --Malkinann (talk) 03:09, 8 August 2009 (UTC)