User talk:KateCook

Welcome to Wikipedia, KateCook! Thank you for your contributions. I am Eartha78 and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Eartha78 (talk) 14:17, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Thanks for your edits to Grace Macurdy. It's always nice to see people working on underrepresented areas on wikipedia, and women in classics/ancient history is one which can always do with more work. I mostly work on ancient women, rather thank women scholars, but I've been around wikipedia for a few years now, so if you ever need any help with the wikipedia editing side of things do feel free to ask me. Caeciliusinhorto (talk) 14:17, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Grace Macurdy

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Grace Macurdy you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Iazyges -- Iazyges (talk) 08:21, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Grace Macurdy

The article Grace Macurdy you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Grace Macurdy for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Iazyges -- Iazyges (talk) 14:41, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Amazing work!!!!! Srsval (talk) 21:55, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Grace Macurdy

On 12 August 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Grace Macurdy, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Grace Macurdy shaped the field of classics by pulling together both material and textual evidence as sources in her studies of individual women? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Grace Macurdy. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Grace Macurdy), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

women's classical committee

Thank you for quality articles about women who foster studies of the Classics, such as Grace Macurdy, beginning with Froma Zeitlin, for improving articles on Greek plays, for project work for Women's Classical Committee, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:46, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A year ago, you were recipient no. 1999 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:21, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Elizabeth Hazelton Haight

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Elizabeth Hazelton Haight you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of J Milburn -- J Milburn (talk) 16:21, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Elizabeth Hazelton Haight

The article Elizabeth Hazelton Haight you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Elizabeth Hazelton Haight for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of J Milburn -- J Milburn (talk) 21:01, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Phillis Wheatley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Neoclassical (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:27, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Association for the Higher Education of Women

I see you just converted ''Association for the Higher Education of Women'' at University of Oxford to [[''Association for the Higher Education of Women'']] when you probably meant ''[[Association for the Higher Education of Women]]''. But if you fix the formatting you will then have to think about modifying Association for the Higher Education of Women which is currently a redirect to Queen Margaret College (Glasgow). Regards, Jonathan A Jones (talk) 11:21, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @User:Jonathan A Jones - Yes, sorry, the formatting has gone a little wonky there. That redirect indeed does not look right - I'm aiming to set up some links for the AEW at Oxford, which doesn't currently have its own page but should do since it has a fairly extensive and significant history (it's going on my to-do list, but I hope that putting in a couple of redlinks for now may spur someone else to get to it before I can)! KateCook (talk) 11:39, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

PS I see now that it should be AEW not 'Higher' so that should at least sort the issue out for now - whoever(s) put the original references to the AEW in some of the pages I'm looking at today seems to have got the title of the Association slightly wrong, which is where some issues are arising. I will fix that now KateCook (talk) 11:42, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Great, thanks, thought it was something like that but easier just to encourage you to fix it than mess it up myself! Jonathan A Jones (talk)

Hi, I have looked at the references for University of Oxford#Women's education and found multiple variants such as "Association for Promoting the Education of Women in Oxford"and "Association for the Higher Education of Women in Oxford" as well as "Association for the Education of Women in Oxford", so earlier editors were using names found in reliable sources. It will be good if you can create an article: I think part of the reason that no-one (including myself) has written the article previously is that many sources mention AEW briefly so finding in depth sources is difficult. TSventon (talk) 13:55, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I know what you mean @TSventon: - Vera Brittain's History of Women at Oxford has got a very detailed account of the AEW, as do a couple of similar works written closer to the time, so I think those are going to be better places to look for the in-depth information rather than incidental mentions. I'm currently working on various other edits with the Brittain in hand, so I can certainly try and see if I can put something together in the next week or so. I am a bit busy at the moment, and I don't think it will be that small a job, which has been what put me off doing it immediately - but I agree that it needs doing, and so I suppose I'd better try to find some time! At least if there's a decent account there as a start, others can start adding extra detail.

I've just been looking online and I think I could only put together a short stub based on online sources: the Victoria County History of St Anne's College has some detail as does The University of Oxford: A History (L. W. B. Brockliss). The History of the University of Oxford: Volume VIII: The Twentieth Century focuses on the women's colleges. Her Oxford (Judy Batson) looks useful but isn't previewed on Google books. I am probably stating the obvious but Wikipedia articles should be based on a range of sources, including recent ones. By the way "reply to" only works if you sign your post. TSventon (talk) 15:35, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've now written a short article on the AEW, which leaves plenty of scope for expansion. TSventon (talk) 12:28, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have had another go at the Association for the Education of Women article using more online sources, so it is now a bit longer. Do have a look if you have time. I see you have nominated Emily Penrose for GA, I will see if I can tweak anything. TSventon (talk) 00:51, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much @TSventon - this is definitely on my list as something I need to get to, but everything has been so busy! I've finally got a copy of Her Oxford so that will help to add some things I imagine. I will hopefully be able to take a proper look in the next week or so. KateCook (talk) 10:56, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Janet E. Courtney, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New College (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Froma Zeitlin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:35, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:53, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Emily Penrose

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Emily Penrose you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ealdgyth -- Ealdgyth (talk) 18:40, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Emily Penrose

The article Emily Penrose you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Emily Penrose for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ealdgyth -- Ealdgyth (talk) 11:01, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:35, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]