User talk:Kaspatik

Welcome!

Hi Kaspatik! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing!

@Gråbergs_Gråa_Sång Thank you for welcoming me :) Kaspatik (talk · contribs)

I hope you like it here and decide to stay! And sorry for not signing a message asking you to remember to sign your messages. I've never been to Lithuania, mainly because boats from Sweden refuse to go to Vilnius. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 18:04, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Gråbergs_Gråa_Sång Yeah, thank you for the warm welcomes and whoops! Must've forgotten it when I was making that edit haha, shame you can't use ships to Lithuania tho, rip. I haven't gotten used to the whole user talk and other formatting, it just kinda escapes my mind, if you get my drift x) Kaspatik (talk) 18:14, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP:s formatting and strange ways takes time getting used to. One thing: It seems you're trying to WP:PING me, but it hasn't quite worked yet. You can do it like this:

[[User:Gråbergs Gråa Sång]] texttexttext ~~~~ or

{{u|Gråbergs Gråa Sång}} texttexttext ~~~~

You wrote [[user|Gråbergs_Gråa_Sång]] which is slightly different and doesn't work (it becomes a link to the WP-article User). Note also that all this must be done in the same published edit, you can't "repair" a ping later (you can change the text, that doesn't matter). WP:CHEATSHEET may be of help, and if you're up to it, try WP:ADVENTURE. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 18:40, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User: Gråbergs Gråa Sång Yeah, still tryna get used to it but thank you for the help. Regardless of my struggles 😅 Kaspatik (talk) 18:51, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That worked! Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 19:24, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sumotori dreams (September 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sumotori dreams and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:56, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. When I do re-submit it for improving the sources and stuff. Do I need to concern myself with whatever might come afterwards? Atleast when it comes to anything like additional sections in tandem with anyone else, just curious about that is all Kaspatik (talk) 12:02, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kaspatik! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:56, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sumotori dreams (September 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sumotori dreams (September 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Seems notable [1] [2] [3] But the article fails to include these sources or any other SIGCOV of note. It needs to be improved somehow.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sumotori dreams and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 06:32, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]