Jump to content

User talk:KJ6MYQ

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Files for upload

[edit]

Hello, and thank you for your request at Files for upload! Unfortunately, your request has been declined. The reason is shown on the main FFU page. The request will be archived shortly; if you cannot find it on that page, it will probably be at this month's archive. Regards, Stefan2 (talk) 10:52, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited United States House of Representatives elections in Michigan, 2012, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Third-party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:51, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

KJ6MYQ (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Requesting an IP address block exemption, because I have done nothing wrong. KJ6MYQ (talk) 22:01, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified sock of blocked User:Cmckain. --jpgordon::==( o ) 22:08, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

KJ6MYQ (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Why are my 3000 good edits destroyed by 10 bad ones? My resent edits should at least allow for some leniency. I think I have proven that I can edit Wikipedia productively. KJ6MYQ (talk) 22:29, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Four separate checkusers have now verified your block is correct. --(ʞɿɐʇ) ɐuɐʞsǝp 22:35, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited United States House of Representatives elections in Michigan, 2012, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mike Rogers (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]