User talk:KIRILL1995/Archive 2

Call out tables & edit summaries

Please have a read of Talk:America's Next Top Model about the new agreed layout of call out tables. Also make sure you use edit summary on all your main space edits. Mt king ^(edits) 20:17, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just to give you fair warning, as you continue to make main space edits without edit summaries, any edits of yours I come across that it is not very clear what you are doing I will just revert. Mt king ^(edits) 01:48, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I will start to revert your edits on sight if you fail to put edit sums. Mt king ^(edits) 06:09, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. this edit is disruptive and re introduced WP:BLP errors.
Either take part in the discussions about the pages or find yourself blocked. Mt king ^(edits) 09:40, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited America's Next Top Model, Cycle 6, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gretel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, KIRILL1995. You have new messages at Mtking's talk page.
Message added 19:12, 27 February 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Have a read of Wikipedia:Verifiability Mt king ^(edits) 19:12, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

See the article talk page, you now need a source that she was in the Call out. Mt king ^(edits) 19:55, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

General Feedback

I have noticed that you make a lot of changes to top model articles. This is good, however you have a very aggressive nature when it comes to editing. Wikipedia is not a race. It is generally encouraged that you find a decent amount of sourcing before making any major or substantial changes. This is especially necessary if there is a dispute. You also refuse to listen to any advice from contributors. Mutual respect is needed to agree on something no? Even if you believe you are right, it is still a little rude to do whatever you want because it should be done that way. I have had trouble with this in the past as well. Feel free to reply.Trafalk09 (talk) 21:35, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

March 2012

Your recent editing history at America's Next Top Model, Cycle 17 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. ApprenticeFan ^work 17:05, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at America's Next Top Model, Cycle 17, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. She took no part in the call out, the fact she was disqualified is not in doubt. Mt king ^(edits) 08:29, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, KIRILL1995. You have new messages at Mtking's talk page.
Message added 08:41, 3 March 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Mt king ^(edits) 08:41, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, KIRILL1995. You have new messages at Talk:America's Next Top Model, Cycle 17.
Message added 09:29, 3 March 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Mt king ^(edits) 09:29, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Russian Call out proof

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wah6BT5pXw8&feature=player_embedded

I think that's proof enough, no? 98.206.38.163 (talk) 16:45, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2012

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to America's Next Top Model, Cycle 18‎ does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! There is an option in "My Preferences" under editing and Advanced options called "Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" Please turn it on. Mt king ^(edits) 00:57, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

America's Next Top Model, Cycle 18

It is not a race to get the info in, I will warn you that I will revert any "winner" unless a source is given. Mt king ^(edits) 00:59, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

America's Next Top Model, Cycle 16

I have reverted your re-insertion of that unsourced section, you will see that it has been unsourced for 11 months, since it is all about living pepole WP:BLP applies and even if it was not, there is the small matter of the WP policy of Verifiability which states "All information in Wikipedia must be verifiable" you are free to re-add the information only when you can provide a reliable source to prove the claims; further re-insertion would be disruptive and likely lead to a block. Mt king ^(edits) 07:38, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hell's Kitchen US Contestant Progress sections

Please revert your change of adding colors to the Best of Best and Best of Worst colors. The consensus that had previously been established for over a year is to not have the colors. I do intend to comply with 3RR, however your edit warring after I brought the debate to the talk page is out of order. That you violated BRD is shameful. Hasteur (talk) 18:39, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And why are you restoring incorrect coding in the table at Hell's Kitchen (U.S. season 7)? You've done this twice now.[1][2] As well as the incorrect code, you've restored a MOS:HASH violation that I've progressively been editing out of the seasons and you restored an incorrect quotation that I recently fixed.[3] Please stop making such edits and start using edit summaries. --AussieLegend (talk) 17:11, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(copied from my talk page)

No. Season 7 is showing in Russia now. Ed didn't called the best in episode 1, as well as Jay in ep. 5 and Ben in ep. 6. I've seen everything. Look at this series and make sure yourself. KIRILL95 (talk) 17:37, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What does any of this have to do with what I wrote above. You've clearly missed the point here. I don't have issue with you fixing incorrect data in cells, the problem is that you are reinserting incorrect table coding, restoring a MOS:HASH violation and restoring inaccurate quotes. By all means, correct errors that you find, but stop reinserting errors. Wholesale reverting such as this, that reverts quite valid edits,[4][5][6] is inappropriate. It makes your edits look like disruptive editing when you don't bother leaving edit summaries that explain why you are doing what you are doing. --AussieLegend (talk) 17:44, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. I really don't understood what you mean. When I returned old verion of table, I retuned it with wrong encoing. Once again, sorry. KIRILL95 (talk) 19:44, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's simple. When editing, don't revert valid edits and use edit summaries. --AussieLegend (talk) 19:55, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Called names in top model

Lilia was called, but not at panel, so either way the color needs to be changed. Also, all the girls that are eliminated outside of judging panel are called in the way Lilia was.

For example Hannah, in Cycle 11 Of ANTM

One of the Jays called Hannah's name, because she would be the contestant going home.

By your logic, the table should look like this:

Order	Episodes
Order	1	2	3	4	5		6	7	9	10	11	12	13
1	Sheena	Marjorie	Lauren Brie	Elina		Clark	Samantha	Marjorie	Analeigh	McKey	Samantha	Analeigh	McKey	McKey
2	Analeigh	Isis	Elina	Lauren Brie		Analeigh	Analeigh	Analeigh	Sheena	Analeigh	McKey	McKey	Samantha	Samantha
3	Nikeysha	McKey	Joslyn	Samantha		Lauren Brie	McKey	McKey	Samantha	Marjorie	Analeigh	Samantha	Analeigh
4	Marjorie	Joslyn	Marjorie	McKey		Sheena	Elina	Samantha	Marjorie	Samantha	Marjorie	Marjorie
5	Samantha	Elina	McKey	Sheena		McKey	Marjorie	Elina	McKey	Elina	Elina
6	Elina	Samantha	Samantha	Joslyn		Marjorie	Lauren Brie	Joslyn	Elina	Sheena
7	Brittany	Brittany	Sheena	Marjorie		Joslyn	Sheena	Sheena	Joslyn
8	McKey	Sheena	Hannah	Clark		Elina	Joslyn	Lauren Brie
9	ShaRaun	Analeigh	Clark	Isis		Samantha	Clark
10	Hannah	Clark	Brittany	Hannah		Isis
11	Lauren Brie	Lauren Brie	Analeigh	Analeigh	Hannah
12	Isis	Hannah	Isis	Brittany
13	Clark	Nikeysha	Nikeysha
14	Joslyn	ShaRaun

2001:558:6033:1E:2162:2060:83D8:30ED (talk) 16:50, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Then so. KIRILL95 (talk) 17:01, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

On Germany's Next Topmodel, Cycle 7 there was an elimination round outside of judging panel where the girls were called in that order with Laura being called last and therefore getting eliminated. It doesn't make sense to erase her name from the table therefore. The same scenario occured on New Zealand's Next Top Model, Cycle 3 with Arohas elimination. Please consider those things before you change COOs by default. Shameless (talk) 12:26, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal for Hell's Kitchen US Series Pages

There is a proposal currently at Talk:Hell's Kitchen (U.S.) concerning preventative semi-protection on previous seasons. Please look at it and provide feedback. Thank you. Hasteur (talk) 16:56, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jfgsloeditor

Since the user has been confirmed as a sock of a banned editor and in-line with WP:DENY, I am proposing to tag the following pages created by this account :

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/America's Next Top Model, Cycle 2

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/America's Next Top Model, Cycle 1

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of America's Next Top Model contestants

for deletion under CSD G5, I am letting you know as you have made a contribution to the page, if you do not want me to then please let me know on my talk page or at the ANI. Mt king ^(edits) 23:31, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hannah Jones's page again?

Someone just ask me on my talk page on how you will remove the "(model)" in the infobox in this page Hannah Jones, i quite keep looking for solution but it ends up nothing! so how will you do it? --Missjenkins (talk) 18:43, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No. What are you? KIRILL95 (talk) 18:48, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Girl With The Best Top Model Freakout

Ahhm KIRILL95 i really need your help with the episode summary of The Girl With The Best Top Model Freakout recap episode i didn't see this episode so can you help me? Thanks --112.198.79.152 (talk) 13:45, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, no, I do not very own English. KIRILL95 (talk) 15:09, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]