User talk:JuliaBWebster
Hi Julia;
I have removed the CSD template from the above article, as a revalidation showed that the article was not quite as close to the amount of advertisement i originally thought. The main reason for thinking so was the excessive amount of links that directed the user to the website on the company (10+). I removed the excessive links and placed one link to the company website in the "See Also" section to counter this problem. I also cleaned the article up a bit, Wikified it and created an automatic reflist instead of the one you manually created.
Don't let this CSD tag discourage you though, as generally taken it is a good article; it has perfectly Neutral wording, and was also about a topic that was Notable. The only thing a little of was the formatting, but that is frankly quite minor. I also see you are quite a new editor, so in case you have any questions regarding articles, editing or anything else that is Wikipedia related feel free to drop a line on my talk page, and ill help you where i can :). Since i am actually writing now anyway, ill leave a little hint about creating automatic reference lists, since i mentioned that earlier:
Little hint If you place links between <ref>Link here</ref> you only have to add the word: {{reflist}} under the references section to generate the reflist automatically.
With kind regards, and wishing you a happy editing time
Excirial (Talk,Contribs) 18:19, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on "300 Atlanta", requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.
If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of "300 Atlanta" and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Daltxn (talk) 18:58, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Acceptable articles
[edit]Could you help me to determine what is an acceptable article and what is not? You helped me a lot on the 300 Bowling and Entertainment Centers article but I had a CSD placed on the 300 Atlanta article that I just posted about one of the 300 Centers. I'd like to learn what formats, copy, etc. I should start incorporating when I post articles in the future.
Can you help?
JuliaBWebster (talk) 19:17, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
- Sure i can!
- The reason why the second article was deleted is most likely an A7: Not notable issue. One of the reasons that this is placed upon a page is because the subject of an article must be notable, that is, have a reason why it should be on an encyclopedia. In this case the subject of the article on the 300 brand is notable because it follows more or less complies with the notability guidelines in WP:Notable, yet the individual location is not notable (On wikipedia being related to notable things doesn't give notability. So a popstars family should not get individual articles just for being family). One of the easiest ways to check if something is notable is asking yourself: "If i am only discussing the articles subject, is it special for any reason? (Special can also be substituted for: Does it meet the specific guidelines for the subject in WP:Notable?".)
- As for the Wikipedia formatting, its pretty easy to learn, but takes a bit of time to master, and you never seem to get finished learning it :). One of the easiest places to learn about formatting using wiki markup is WP:Markup. This page offers a basic overview of the most used wiki markup; Its doesn't cover any templates that can be used, but 9 out of 10 times those are only used for maintenance work, and not for writing articles.
- Hope that helps, and as always with kind regards,
- Excirial (Talk,Contribs) 19:38, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:300 Logo.jpg)
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:300 Logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:17, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Unspecified source for Image:300_logo_gra_4cp_k+485_r.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:300_logo_gra_4cp_k+485_r.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:46, 5 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MER-C 11:46, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
The article 300 Bowling and Entertainment Centers has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Notability issue raised in 2008. One regional brief news page as only source (the only valid one).
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Keith 09:25, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of 300 Bowling and Entertainment Centers for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 300 Bowling and Entertainment Centers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/300 Bowling and Entertainment Centers until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JayJayWhat did I do? 01:50, 8 July 2014 (UTC)