User talk:Jreferee/Archive 15

Wikipedia:Recent additions 145/History

Repost -- Jreferee t/c 17:08, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Hi - I have an updated version of the DYK tool which addresses nearly all your recent comments. I've created a new history table, see Wikipedia:Recent additions 145/History. There's at least one anomaly I'm still chasing (Boosey & Hawkes). As usual, let me know if there's anything that looks like the tool should have caught. BTW - there are more multiple noms in Wikipedia:Recent additions 147/History than you noticed. I've added two more rows. -- Rick Block (talk) 01:15, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. Hopefully, the updated version of the DYK tool can catch the multiple noms (however they are configured). I'll try to keep an eye out for multiple credits, like this one. I'll get on Wikipedia:Recent additions 145/History and use this thread to post any comments. -- Jreferee t/c 14:05, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

• The bot missed this nom Armed Forces (sports society) probably to the article name change. -- Jreferee t/c 17:08, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for November 19th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 3, Issue 47	19 November 2007	About the Signpost

An interview with Florence Devouard	Author borrows from Wikipedia article without attribution
WikiWorld comic: "Raining animals"	News and notes: Page patrolling, ArbCom age requirement, milestones
Wikipedia in the News	WikiProject Report: History
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 10:17, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Lakes

You know, I think all geographic features such as lakes are notable, however inadequate the article. You might want to restore Siltcoos Lake that you speedy-deleted, and mark it as a stub. DGG (talk) 01:36, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

I see that you've been working on this article, for which thanks; I was trying to find the right stub tab for it, or alternately find some sort of Oregon group and get them to take this on. But thanks for adding the cites, I think that will save it from any further speedy tags. I'll keep looking for a way to get someone to adopt it. Accounting4Taste:talk 01:59, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Wow. You found the right stub, you found the right project, and faster than I could even get started; I can tell this article is in VERY good hands. Thanks again. Accounting4Taste:talk 02:01, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

New pages patrol

After spending a long time on vandalism patrol I'm now trying New pages patrol. You reversed my db-bio nomination on Phil Williams (presenter) and that's fine. Even though I've read CSD, etc. It still takes experience to develop judgment. So I want to learn from my mistake on this one. Is there an objective criterion that I overlooked or is it just a judgment call? Is there any better way for me to learn the criteria and proper judgment except by being bold and continuing on patrol, making CSD calls as I see them? Could you please take a look at[1] and give me your opinion on the three articles I mention there? Thanks. Sbowers3 (talk) 02:00, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

• Phil Williams (presenter) is on TV, so it seems enough importance/signifance. Another admin might have deleted it. Be bold. It's a team effort between those tagging and those deleting. If you tag it wrong and I see a different reason to speedy delete, I'll speedy delete if for the different reason. -- Jreferee t/c 02:05, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Thanks for both answers. Sbowers3 (talk) 02:24, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

You deleted my CheapAssMTA pages BEFORE I could finish the talk page

Why did you do that AFTER I put a HOLDON on the page??? You totally ignored Wikipedia protocol! User:arfon

CheapAssMTA didn't have a holdon template on the page. I deleted it under CSD G11 Blatant advertisement masquerading as an article. See WikiSpam. It also could have been deleted under CSD A7 No reasonable assertion of importance/significance. -- Jreferee t/c 02:41, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

It did have a "hold on", I copied and placed it per the instructions! 2nd, You deleted the page again EVEN THOUGH it was a copy of the Zimbra MTA page... When will that one be deleted????

I leave the CheapAssMTA article for another admin. -- Jreferee t/c 02:57, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

CSD A1 versus CSD A7

I nommed Airgunsmith for speedy delete per A1, and you deleted per A7. Did it qualify under both, or was I mistaken in my nom? Thanks, Mr Which^??? 02:28, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

CSD A1 is for very short article with little or no context for the statements made. There seem to be enough context (although the time element was missing), although reasonable people could disagree. It qualified for A7. -- Jreferee t/c 02:36, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

So you don't feel that my gut feel of an A1 violation was wrong per se, but rather that it was a more clear example of an A7. Is that a fair read of your take? Mr Which^??? 02:38, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Your A1 violation request was fine. Another admin might have deleted it under A1. -- Jreferee t/c 02:55, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your help. I'm still finding my see legs, and I appreciate all the help I can get in IDing candidates for speedy. Mr Which^??? 02:57, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

You might also want to participate at WP:DRV. That's where the speedy deletions are challenged. -- Jreferee t/c 03:01, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Template talk:Did you know backlogged

Template talk:Did you know backlogged, your attention would be appreciated. Benjiboi 17:09, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Privatemusings

An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened, and is located here. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Privatemusings/Evidence. Please submit your evidence within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Privatemusings/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Picaroon (t) 18:53, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

DRV notices

Are you doing these semi-automated? I just saw you leave a notice for RickK, who hasn't been around for a couple of years... EVula // talk // ☯ // 20:15, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. Every now and then, I go through all the DRV listings and then post notices to each of the deleting admins. I'll try to be more careful. -- Jreferee t/c 20:25, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

AfD closures

Rather than tell me how wrong I was to close certain afd's maybe your time would be better spent dealing with the current afd backlog Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. If my decisions were so wrong why haven't you re-opened them? RMHED (talk) 01:03, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

Jreferee, please review this comment on my talk page by an uninvolved senior editor. GRBerry 01:18, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

I WAS DIRECTED HERE TO TALK ABOUT WHY SHIBBY HAS BEEN DELETED FROM WIKIPEDIA. I MANAGE THE UK POP PUNK BAND AND ITS SILLY THAT WE'RE NOT REPRESENTED ON HERE.

MARK ADAMS MSA MUSIC MARK@MSAMUSIC.CO.UK —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.193.61.240 (talk) 07:59, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you! I appreciate the userbox...I put it on my userpage. Nikki311 03:12, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

Malayalam Miffed

I just got a little harsh with you on the Mappila Malayalam AfD. I researched every reference to that article, googled it 5 different ways and checked every link, researched it in outside biblio-sources, contacted a few people I know I Kerela both Indian and American that run orphanages there, and there is not one thing to substantiate that as a dialect in and of itself. It is being connected to Islam for some reason and some one on a the Malayalam page tried to create Buddhist Malayalam, Jewish Malayalam, Hindu Malayalam, etc. The primary contributor is confused along religious and ethnic lines and he is creating his own dialects and putting them Wiki. This is merely a case of someone making things up as original unacademic research in an area where a linguistics authority is needed.

I was a bit miffed that you posed that I censor my opinions and then I see that you are an established Admin. Not Kosher---Iconoclast.Horizon (talk) 19:57, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!

Hey, thanks!!! :) Didn't know it got noticed... Anyways, I actually wanted to have YakBak in a crazy, colourful way, but my signature became toooo long to be acceptable. So I settled for yak. The concept got stuck in my head cos the band, Audio Adrenaline used to credit one of its members with actually doing the Yak-Bak on their records... Way too funky. :D aJCfreak yAk 21:45, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

The NAS

Glad to see that the links to it are increasing! :) Acalamari 03:01, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Heh, heh, good posting! I use my own userspace template, User:Acalamari/RFAcongratulations, to give to new admins, though I sometimes write a personal posting depending on the situation. My template gives them the Admins' T-shirt and a link to the school. Even if a new admin has been given more than one link to the school, I think that's a good sign because if more people recommend it, more people will visit the school. Good one for asking Deskana to include the school in his posting to new admins; I know that at least one bureaucrat, Warofdreams, includes a link to the school in his postings to new admins. Acalamari 17:17, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

RMHED

He has now switched from controversially closing AfDs to controversially tagging every episode in TV series (currently Heroes and Star Trek) with Notability tags. Is this user in need of a block to let him know that WP is not about making points to others based on our own personal opinions? Mr Which^??? 16:29, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

If you think RMHED's actions meet Wikipedia:Disruptive editing, perhaps explain your reasoning to RMHED on his talk page. If that does not work, try Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. -- Jreferee t/c 17:09, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

I've tried on his talk. He's flippant and clear that he doesn't care what others think. As for AN/I, we're not admins, and I don't care to wade into that morass. I went to an admin that had interacted with him (you), after trying to discuss his actions at his talk page. Mr Which^??? 17:18, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

It's not clear to me whether RMHED's actions meet Wikipedia:Disruptive editing. The best place to get an opinion on that is at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. -- Jreferee t/c 17:30, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Okay. I may take it to another admin, but AN/I isn't really an option for me. Too much drama. Mr Which^??? 17:34, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Democrat In Name Only

Regarding your post on my talk page--I certainly believe everything I said about the article and would support having something there. However, generating content is not really my thing on WP, so I'm not going to take a stab at writing a new article. I hope somebody does, though. Croctotheface (talk) 04:33, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

RfA thanks

Just wanted to say thanks for supporting me! Please find your thank you card here, should you wish to see it. I'm honored to have received your support; don't know if you remember, but you helped me out with some questions I had early on, and I really appreciated it :) All the best, ~Eliz81^(C) 23:19, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

re: Signing with a different name

Hello, I noticed that you left a message on my talkpage and then deleted it, so I thought I would clarify the issue that you brought up. Danielrocks123 is my old user name, I recently had it changed to Dantheman531, which is how it appears when I leave my signature now. Hope this helps. --דניאל - Dantheman531 02:10, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. I previously figured it out, so I deleted the message. But I appreciate your post. : ) -- Jreferee t/c 13:52, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

Somewhat-Belated RfA Thanks

Tapadh Leibh (Thank You)...

...for helping me navigate the waters of my surprisingly peaceful RFA, which closed successfully with 85 supports, 1 oppose, and 0 neutral.

I would particularly like to thank Acalamari and Alison, my nominators, and everyone who watched the page and ran the tally.

If there is anything I can do to be of service in the future, please feel free to contact me. (Oh, and if you hate RfA Thankspam, please forgive me. I promise I won't block you for deleting it ;-))

And forgive me if I need a Wikibreak now and then (like now. I'm exhausted!). You wouldn’t want to see me climbing the Reichstag, now would you?

Off to flail around with my new mop! (what?!)

Kathryn NicDhàna ♫♦♫
This RfA thanks inspired by Neranei's, which was inspired by VanTucky's which was in turn inspired by LaraLove's which was inspired by The Random Editor's, which was inspired by Phaedriel's original thanks.

Dean24

I would like to report this user for recreating an already deleted page...-Razorflame (talk) 17:13, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

You posted {{db-group}} on the Badminton cricket club and the page was speedy deleted. There is are warning schemes at Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace. If any apply, just add the warnings as needed and the user automatically will be reported based on the posted warning level. -- Jreferee t/c 17:43, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for November 26th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 3, Issue 48	26 November 2007	About the Signpost

Arbitration Committee elections: Candidate profiles	WikiWorld comic: "Cursive"
News and notes: Ombudsman commission, fundraiser, milestones	Wikipedia in the News
WikiProject Report: Education in Australia	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:13, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Spime DRV

Precisely because I was a closing admin, it would be kinda pompous to "endorse" myself. I don't want to weigh in during the review, unless I am asked for additional explanations or I have to contest some statements. `'Míkka>t 19:54, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

RfA question

Mouse strain. Tim Vickers (talk) 20:24, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your vote of confidence and feel free to add me to you Rolodex now, but you should know that Tim Vickers is a big molecular biology geek too.--DO11.10 (talk) 22:37, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Why?

Did you delete Velvet Sky there were other sources that backed up her claims than MySpace and she's certainly notable considering she is one of the first TRUE TNA Knockout wrestlers, remember this is an encyclopedia not a ditatorship why did no one care to notify me that my creation was being deleted--KingMorpheus (talk) 23:26, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

DYK backlogged again

Hi, Template talk:Did you know backlogged six hours (a full cycle), your attention would be appreciated. Benjiboi 22:34, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Generalized Ozaki cost function

Thx for your note on the above article. There about 289,000 "Google Scholar" hits for "cost function" but only 1 for "Ozaki cost function" (an article by the same author as for the "A Nonhomothetic Generalized Leontief Cost Function Based on Pooled Data" reference in the WP article). So, it does not seem to have enough scholarly attestation to survive a request for deletion of the article. Further, there is not even a "Cost function" article for WP. So, the above article would seem to have a very limited audience. Sorry. --Thomasmeeks (talk) 23:43, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Moonriddengirl

Good job! But I pointed out how nuanced her good critcial thinking skills are.:) Cheers, 02:11, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Knicksfan4ever

I interacted with him early on, when he was screwing up while trying to keep his articles from being deleted. I came to the conclusion that he was a sincere, but truly frustrated newbie. I see that it has escalated pretty unpleasantly. I left him an offer to help, and I hope he will take it. You may not like me much, but you know that I'm a stickler for notability and proper sourcing. Kww (talk) 12:42, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

I try not to take a personal interest in any thing I do on Wikipedia and my interest in things usually only last about three days. This combination keeps me from generating bad feelings and/or holding grudges towards others. I have no bad feelings towards you and I see it as that we merely had a disgreement. Knicksfan4ever is new and his/her reaction is typical of someone used to contributing on the Internet in places outside of Wikipedia. Most people have a rocky start with the Wikiway. I'm sure Knicksfan4ever will do fine. -- Jreferee t/c 15:13, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks to both of you guys, you are correct with your assessments, I am a newbie trying to feel myself around and learn. I've been using wikipedia for about a year to do research on an array of subjects and found it to be helpful. Someone else created the article that was deleted and I found out about it, which is why I decided to join because I felt it was notable and I went through the proper channels to discuss, but instead of receiving help, it felt like I was being ganged up on. I was not trying to "wikistalk" or badger anyone, truly not the case. After receiving a response from the nominator I did some research and did notice that the edits that were made on certain pages, which made me come to the conclusion that it was personal, which is why I exchanged words (should I say text) with the person. I do agree it went a little too far and I may have let my natural human emotions get the best of me via the internet, especially about something I feel so passionately about. I do plan to correct the page along wikipedia's guidelines, I'm in the process of reading how it works, donate and have others donate to keep wikipedia going. It's a great tool!!! I just feel like everytime I make an edit to correct the page Lizz Robbins it will keep getting deleted, just like it was when I made the first edit. Thanks again, BTW, I am a female, but a huge tomboy at heart (smile)Knicksfan4ever (talk) 16:19, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Swalwell, Alberta

I'm reopening the AFD, even if it will likely end up being kept anyway. I will also admonish the user who closed it. --Coredesat 19:28, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

spamming talk pages

Please stop.--Doc^g 23:13, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Mass talk page postings

It may be a better idea to mention that on WP:AN or some other community page rather than mass posting a message (many people do not appreciate this). John Reaves 23:14, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

No, really, please stop. This would be far better off at a central place, and the last thing we need is you blocked for mass-messaging. Daniel 23:18, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, you are continuing and are not responding to concerns here. I've blocked you for 15 min. I'm happy to lift this if you agree to stop and talk this over.--Doc^g 23:20, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Too bad it came to this, but you were given ample time to respond. John Reaves 23:22, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

John. I saw your and Docs' post at 23:17, 28 November 2007, stopped posting, and logged off as I had some pressing business. I wasn't aware I that you or anyone else was requesting a response as well. Doc's 23:19 block was two minutes after I stopped and logged off. Doc, why didn't you check my contributions before blocking me? Doc your block was wrong and you owe me an apology. -- Jreferee t/c 00:49, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

I have responded on my talk page. Daniel 01:11, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Me too, but since there's an accusation here about me, I will respond here too. I did check your contributions - maybe there was 69 seconds between my last refresh of your contributions loading and my finishing deciding on the duration of the block and what to write in the block summary. Sorry for that delay.--Doc^g 01:14, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

That is a reasonable explanation. No hard feelings. As I posted in several other locations, I regret the concern I cause in everyone. -- Jreferee t/c 02:01, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Re: Classification of admins

My user name will probably be an orphan category. Aquarius • talk 01:10, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

I added myself to the Letter category (in case it isn't obvious,--and it isn't :P--A and O are capital because of Alpha and Omega). Cheers! · AndonicO ^Talk 03:36, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Added myself too. :) Yonatan ^talk 15:17, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Dlohcierekim

Wow. You made me blush. :) Thank you. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 13:13, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

About “Justice as Fairness” and “Equity (Law)”. Rawls belongs in Philosophy of Law or Philosophy of Politics, not in Equity (Law).

Justice works by rules while equity works by discretion (two processes which are not mutually exclusive, more like interdependent). It is sort of like the duality of electricity and magnetism. You have some finite total energy to apportion between a rule which you adopt now but which only approximates the justice you seek to foster and a delegation of the rest to the discretion of the decision maker at the time subject to objection and application of further rules (hence the duality). Think lazy evaluation versus structure of computer programs for implementing an algorithm. --Jrgetsin (talk) 13:43, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for your exhaustive support note with review

Dear Jreferee, Thank you for supporting in my recent RfA. Words nor pictures can express my heartfelt appreciation at the confidence the community has shown me. I am both heartened and humbled by this confidence. I will carry the lessons learned from the constructive criticism I have received with me as I edit Wikipedia, and heed those lessons. Special thanks to Pedro and Henrik as nominators. Special thanks to Rudget who wanted to. A very special thanks to Moonriddengirl for her eloquence. Cheers, Dlohcierekim 16:42, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

re: Classification of admins

I'd love to add my name, but I'm not sure exactly where it'd go (my intention is that it was to be unique and funny in a Who's on First kind of way, not to represent anything really, and the "0" for the "o" is so that it wouldn't be too confusing (and because "You" was already taken at a few websites I use.) Y0u | Y0ur talk page 20:26, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

LGBT WikiProject Newsletter

Delivered on 20:05, 3 December 2007 (UTC). SatyrBot 21:13, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for December 3rd, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 3, Issue 49	3 December 2007	About the Signpost

Signpost interview: New Executive Director Sue Gardner	Arbitration Committee elections: Elections open
Possible license migration sparks debate	Featured articles director names deputy
Software bug fixed, overuse of parser function curtailed	WikiWorld comic: "Wordplay"
News and notes: Wikipedian honored, fundraiser, milestones	Wikipedia in the News
WikiProject Report: LGBT studies	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 09:29, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Ken Evoy

This may be the most active WikiPedia talk page ever. The point of this note is to ask for your insight, Jreferee. Back in September 2007, you added a lot of GREAT research about Ken Evoy in order to support the overturning of an AfD of his article: Ken Evoy. That conversation can be found here...AfD conversation

Before I could implement your research findings (thanks for that, by the way...you seem to have access to some powerful info databases) the article got a "COI" on it because of a SiteSell representative signing onto WikiPedia. I'm at a loss for how to get the tag off now that they have mentioned they will no longer contribute (not sure if they decided to leave WikiPedia altogether or just not touch the Ken Evoy article). In your opinion, Jreferee, is there something special that I need to do? Your insight is appreciated as I'd like to have at least one good WikiPedia article before moving on to others! Maltiti2005 21:10, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Block on Islam/animals page

Hey Jreferee, could you review the relevance of the block protection on the Islam and animals page please? If it’s no longer necessary I’d like to do some work on the page. I left a formal request on the talk page. Thanks, --S.dedalus (talk) 06:17, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

I second that opinion. I wanted to somewhat expand the article and was surprised to find that it is blocked. Please unblock it. -- Gabi S. (talk) 20:20, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for December 10th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 3, Issue 50	10 December 2007	About the Signpost

Wikipedia dragged into German politics over Nazi images	Wales comments on citing Wikipedia produce BBC correction
WikiWorld comic: "Kilroy was here"	News and notes: Elections, Wikimania 2009, milestones
Wikipedia in the News	WikiProject Report: Greater Manchester
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:35, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Pyroterrorism article

Thanks for your note. It looks like the Pyroterrorism article has been deleted. Jayjg ^(talk) 03:12, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

Happy Holidays

You got a Christmas card! → → →

Wishing you and yours the very best of the holiday season. May the coming year bring you peace, joy, health and happiness. God bless us, every one! -- ALLSTARecho 21:30, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for December 17th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 3, Issue 51	17 December 2007	About the Signpost

From the editor: ArbCom elections, holiday publication
Former Wikimedia employee's criminal history detailed	Möller resigns from board, joins foundation as employee
Google announces foray into user-generated knowledge	WikiWorld comic: "Tractor beam"
News and notes: Elections, Wikimania 2009, milestones	Wikipedia in the News
WikiProject Report: Plants	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 19:06, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Hartmut Gründler. new article /dec11 07. Help required

Hello, Jreferee. Since you offered assistance to authors of biographies I would like to describe what I have been doing and where I think I need some help. In January 2007 I started an an article on "Hartmut Gründler" in the German Wikipedia. (I knew the Gandhi-adherent Gründler since 1975 and cooperated with him until his fire suicide mid November 1977, which he committed out of protest against the misinformation of the German Government in its atomic energy policy. I keep an archive of his writings and documents about him [about 1000 documents listed up] and prepare to write a new biography of him. I have already published some of his writings, in 1997.) Some weeks ago I translated into English my wiki-text, which had been thoroughly revised by my German administrators, and started to put the stub into the English wikipedia. In the recent days I added the rest (two photoes still need to be inserted). My request now is: a) Could you have a look at my article? b) What have I to do to change the status of "stub-class" into the appropriate status of an ordinary article? c) Where can I find the guidelines for the additional insertion of the two envisaged photos, the one of the German text and a second one whose author I still have to find out. d) Could you help me with the correct wordings of the categories (which I simply copied from the German article)? e) Are there any further helpful suggestions you could make to enhance my article? With kind greetings, --Wilfried Huefler (talk) 11:25, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Sun

Hi, When are you going to unprotect Sun? Thanks, 81.109.216.245 (talk) 15:19, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for December 26th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 3, Issue 52	26 December 2007	About the Signpost

Wales appoints six arbitrators	Board approves expansion, up to 11 trustees possible
WikiWorld comic: "Molasses"	News and notes: Stewards, Senate testimony, milestones
Wikipedia in the News	WikiProject Report: Plants
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 13:25, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Happy New Year

Hello Jreferee, I hope you had a pleasant New Year's Day, and that 2008 brings further success, health and happiness! ...Here's to another year of DYK!.... ~ Blnguyen (bananabucket) 07:10, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Proposed article on Laurence Caruana

Hello Jreferee

I recently posted a stub for an article on Laurence Caruana. I posted it on the discussion page, awaiting some feedback before trying to post it as an article (I'm not sure if this was proper procedure - please advise). Could you please cast a sympathetic eye over it? I would greatly appreciate any advice you might have - particularly as I would like to post it without causing any issues. You can find the stub at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Laurence_Caruana

Thanks for your time and patience,

Jemecache (talk) 18:31, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

---

Thanks in advance,

---

Hello again,

It seems it was wrong to try posting a proposed article on Laurence Caruana on the discussion page - it was immediately deleted! Well, live n' learn.

I've now posted the proposed article in my sandbox. It can be found by going to [jemecache/sandbox]. Could you please cast an eye over it before I try to post it?

I also have a question. If (after I post it) someone tags the article with a template that questions notability, what is the usual procedure for responding? How long does the template remain, and who removes it? Can I remove it? Is it normal for someone to put a template, without at least discussing the issue first? So far, I haven't found a wiki policy that explains all this. - Thanks!

Jemecache (talk) 17:21, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for January 14th, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 4, Issue 3	14 January 2008	About the Signpost

From the editor: A new weekly feature
Special: 2007 in Review	Wikimania 2009 bidding ends, jury named
Controversial non-administrator rollback process added	Supposed advance draft of Jobs keynote surfaces on talk page
WikiWorld comic: "The Nocebo Effect"	News and notes: Fundraiser ends, $500,000 donation, milestones
Wikipedia in the News	Tutorial: Fundamentals of editing
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:29, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Gypsy Bare knuckle fighter

Hi, im trying to write bois on many gypsy bare knuckle fighters, to add to a boxing wikipedia page listed bare knuckle fighters, the problem with gypsies is they have a way of only passing knowledge by way of speach, and most gypsies over the age of 45 dont read or write, how ever there is some books on the fighters and I can add web content.. can you help me to write maybe two sentence boi on about five fighters.86.162.219.155 (talk) 18:51, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

LGBT WikiProject Newsletter

Delivered sometime in January 2008 (UTC). SatyrBot (talk) 23:36, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for January 21st, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 4, Issue 4	21 January 2008	About the Signpost

Special: 2007 in Review, Part II	New parser preprocessor to be introduced
Commons Picture of the Year contest in final round	WikiWorld comic: "Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo"
News and notes: Freely-licensed music, milestones	Wikipedia in the News
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 23:57, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Image query

Hello Jreferee. You might remember me from a discussion we had regarding Image:NREAGANKISSCASKET1.jpg, a photo of Nancy Reagan kissing President Reagan's casket in the Capitol rotunda. During the undeletion discussion, the issue of the image being iconic was brought up; I would like to inquire as to what circumstances an image can be uploaded under fair use because it is 'iconic' (such as this image). The Nancy Reagan image certainly is iconic, and I believe it was deleted because, as you correctly pointed out, I had a lack of understanding Wikipedia's image policies. I'm much more in-tune now and feel it is time to revisit this issue, as User:IronGargoyle stated on the deletion review page. I was wondering if you could shed some light on how to do this. Thanks, Happyme22 (talk) 03:45, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for January 28th, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 4, Issue 5	28 January 2008	About the Signpost

From the editor: New feature
Special: 2007 in Review, Part III	Signpost interview: John Broughton
New parser preprocessor introduced	Best of WikiWorld: "Truthiness"
News and notes: Estonian Wikipedia, Picture of the Year, milestones	Wikipedia in the News
Tutorial: Reporting and dealing with vandals	WikiProject Report: Molecular and Cellular Biology
Wikipedia Dispatches: Banner year for Featured articles	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 03:48, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Help

I need help for making a menu for myself.Can you help me? 5faizan (talk) 18:12 4 February 2008

WP:Miscellany_for_deletion/User:BQZip01/Comments#User:BQZip01.2FComments

If you remember, you weighed in on the use of user pages to draft a future RFC, and whether such use might count as an attack page if not promptly converted from a personal on-wiki collection of evidence about a person into an actual RFC or ArbCom case. The above is an ongoing discussion of one such user page; part of the question is what counts as a "reasonable" period of time to bring the RFC or delete the draft. (Opinions differ from "a few days" to "several months.") The discussion seems to be floundering a bit on what this policy means, so, if you're interested, I thought you might have input to add. (If not, sorry to bug you.) Thanks. --TheOtherBob 15:29, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for February 4th, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 4, Issue 6	4 February 2008	About the Signpost

Special: 2007 in Review, Part IV	Tensions in journalistic use of Wikipedia explored
Best of WikiWorld: "Calvin and Hobbes"	News and notes: Milestones
Wikipedia in the News	Tutorial: Adding citations
Dispatches: New methods to find Featured Article candidates	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:09, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:KateLorigPublicity.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:KateLorigPublicity.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 13:23, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:TownTopicsLogo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:TownTopicsLogo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:12, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for February 11th, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 4, Issue 7	11 February 2008	About the Signpost

Petition seeks to remove images of Muhammad	Foundation's FY2007 audit released
Vatican claims out-of-context Wikipedia quote was used to attack Pope	Best of WikiWorld: "W"
News and notes: Working group, Wik-iPhone, milestones	Wikipedia in the News
Tutorial: Basic dispute resolution	Dispatches: Great saves at Featured article review
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:44, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Restore Article

Digital Paint: Paintball 2 has recently satisfied the general notability criteria (WP:N) by being featured in the PC Gamer UK magazine, as seen here. In several weeks, it will be on the magazine's main site, which will provide further proof of publication. Could this article please be restored? If not, what steps do I need to take for it to be possible?

I apologize if this isn't the correct place to request its restoration, here is the original deletion review. Thank you for your time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.13.165.19 (talk) 21:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for February 18th and 25th, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 4, Issue 8	18 February 2008	About the Signpost

From the editor
Michael Snow, Domas Mituzas appointed to Board of Trustees	WikiWorld: "Thinking about the immortality of the crab"
News and notes: Administrator desysopped, milestones	Wikipedia in the News
Tutorial: Getting an article to featured article status	Dispatches: FA promotion despite adversity
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Volume 4, Issue 9	25 February 2008	About the Signpost

Signpost interview: Michael Snow	Controversial RfA results in resysopping of ^demon
Sockpuppeting administrator desysopped, community banned	Two major print encyclopedias cease production
WikiWorld: "Hyperthymesia"	News and notes: Wikimania Call for Participation, milestones
Wikipedia in the News	WikiProject Report: Family Guy
Dispatches: A snapshot of featured article categories	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:28, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Notice of Inactivity

In trying to deliver the LGBT Project newsletter, SatyrBot detected a period of three months of inactivity from this account. You have been placed in our "Inactive Members" section. If this has been done in error, please let my bot owner know and change your status in he project. Thanks! SatyrBot (talk) 17:39, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Leo J. Meyer

Please have a look at the DRV for Leo J. Meyer (currently seen at User:Meyerj) located at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2008 March. Its my opinion that the article met the standards for verifiability and notability. I would appreciate your input into the matter. MrPrada (talk) 18:30, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for March 3rd, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 4, Issue 10	3 March 2008	About the Signpost

Wales' relationship, breakup with journalist Rachel Marsden raises questions about possible improprieties	Eleven users apply for bureaucratship
Signpost interview: Domas Mituzas	Role of hidden categories under discussion
Book review: Wikipedia: The Missing Manual	Military history WikiProject elections conclude, nine elected
Best of WikiWorld: "Extreme ironing"	News and notes: Encyclopedia of Life, Wikipedian dies, milestones
Dispatches: April Fools mainpage featured article	WikiProject Report: Football
Tutorial: How to use an ImageMap	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:55, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:ChristianPotenzaPublicity.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:ChristianPotenzaPublicity.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rossrs (talk) 13:00, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

A-class review of the William Stacy article

Hello Jreferee. Last summer you had kindly nominated the William Stacy article to appear under the Did you know... section. I’ve recently noticed that you are a member of WikiProject Biography, so I wanted to ask for your help (if you are interested). Since last summer, the William Stacy article achieved GA-class, and then underwent a biography peer review here. I submitted the article for a biography A-class review here during December, but there seems to be a lack of A-class reviewers. If you have the time, and if you are interested or inclined to review the article, I would appreciate. If not, no problem. Thank you, ColWilliam (talk) 01:47, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Derek Smart WP:BLP article assistance

Hello, for sometime now, the Derek Smart article has come under various attacks. To the extent that most of the editors who seem to have tenure, are no longer even vetting the entries. For e.g. today I made various revisions under the WP:BLP guidelines and also left notes in the talk page. Another editor, SwatJester who has done such blanking before, simply came in and revert the change without so much as even reading it nor indicating why he did that. This is clearly abuse. If you read the changes I made, you will see that not only were they factual but also perfectly correct for a closely watched [WP:BLP] article. Can you help? Otherwise, its just going to end up being yet another revert war and with the erroneous data being left in place.Ho Lee Cow (talk) 15:11, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Please view the Derek Smart Arbitration Case remedies, as well as Ho Lee Cow's contributions. It's extremely likely that this editor is a sockpuppet of Derek Smart. ⇒SWATJester ^{Son of the Defender} 18:37, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for March 13th and 17th, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 4, Issue 11	13 March 2008	About the Signpost

From the editor
Accusations of financial impropriety receive more coverage	Best of WikiWorld: "Five-second rule"
News and notes: New bureaucrat, Wikimania bids narrowed, milestones	Wikipedia in the News
Dispatches: Vintage image restoration	WikiProject Report: Professional wrestling
Tutorial: Summary of policies	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Volume 4, Issue 12	17 March 2008	About the Signpost

Best of WikiWorld: "The Rutles"	News and notes: Single-user login, election commission, milestones
Wikipedia in the News	Dispatches: Changes at peer review
WikiProject Report: Tropical cyclones	Tutorial: Editing Monobook, installing scripts
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 23:07, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for March 24th, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 4, Issue 13	24 March 2008	About the Signpost

Single User Login enabled for administrators	Best of WikiWorld: "Clabbers"
News and notes: $3,000,000 grant, milestones	Wikipedia in the News
Dispatches: Banner shells tame talk page clutter	WikiProject Report: Video games
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:34, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for March 31st, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 4, Issue 14	31 March 2008	About the Signpost

Wikimania 2009 to be held in Buenos Aires	Sister Projects Interview: Wikisource
WikiWorld: "Hammerspace"	News and notes: 10M articles, $500k donation, milestones
Dispatches: Featured content overview	WikiProject Report: Australia
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 21:16, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:MBarm.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:MBarm.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Kelly ^hi! 00:51, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:MBstom.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:MBstom.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Kelly ^hi! 00:52, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:MBneck1.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:MBneck1.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Kelly ^hi! 00:53, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:MBneck2.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:MBneck2.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Kelly ^hi! 00:54, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for April 7th and 14th, 2008.

Sorry, it seems that the bot quit before completing its run last week. Here is the last two weeks' worth of Signpost. Ralbot (talk) 08:27, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 4, Issue 15	7 April 2008	About the Signpost

April Fools' pranks result in temporary blocks for six admins	WikiWorld: "Apples and oranges"
News and notes: 100 x 5,000, milestones	Wikipedia in the News
Dispatches: Reviewers achieving excellence	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Volume 4, Issue 16	14 April 2008	About the Signpost

From the editor
Interview with the team behind one of the 2,000th featured articles	Image placeholders debated
WikiWorld: "Pet skunk"	News and notes: Board meeting, milestones
Wikipedia in the News	Dispatches: Featured article milestone
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:27, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Stephanie Adams Article On Wiki

You once mentioned the article on Stephanie Adams being at the "Start" stage, but recently I tried to add more to it and it seems to be significantly thorough already. Do you think it has upgraded to "B"? How do you change that? Maybe you can take a look for yourself. Have a great day. 69.204.224.140 (talk) 00:23, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for April 21st, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 4, Issue 17	21 April 2008	About the Signpost

BLP deletion rules discussed amidst controversial AFD	Threat made against high school on Wikipedia, student arrested
Global login, blocking features developed	WikiWorld: "Disruptive technology"
News and notes: Wikimania security, German print Wikipedia, milestones	Wikipedia in the News
Dispatches: Monthly updates of styleguide and policy changes	WikiProject Report: The Simpsons
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 16:58, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for May 2nd and 9th, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 4, Issue 18	2 May 2008	About the Signpost

From the editor
Wikimedia Board to expand, restructure	Arbitrator leaves Wikipedia
Bot approvals group, checkuser nominations briefly held on RfA	WikiWorld: "World domination"
News and notes: Board elections, milestones	Wikipedia in the News
Dispatches: Did You Know ...	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Volume 4, Issue 19	9 May 2008	About the Signpost

Sister Projects Interview: Wikiversity	WikiWorld: "They Might Be Giants"
News and notes: Board elections, milestones	Wikipedia in the News
Dispatches: Featured content from schools and universities	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:02, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for May 12th, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 4, Issue 20	12 May 2008	About the Signpost

Explicit sexual content draws fire	Sighted revisions introduced on the German Wikipedia
Foundation receives copyright claim from church	Board to update privacy policy, adopts data retention policy
Update on Citizendium	Board candidacies open through May 22
Two wiki events held in San Francisco Bay Area	New feature enables users to bypass IP blocks
WikiWorld: "Tony Clifton"	News and notes: Autoconfirmed level, milestones
Wikipedia in the News	Dispatches: Changes at Featured lists
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 10:09, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Somatic Responses

I spent about fifteen minutes trying to find just the info on there, okay? This is not a snippet from the band page. This is information that is hard to find. I would consider you right, except that Somatic Responses are no less notable than Rabia Sorda - an another article on an indie electronic band that I created - and this article actually contains information that people can't just find without typing it into Google.
I hate this about you admins sometimes. You deleate articles on things just because you haven't heard of them. Stormchaser (talk) 01:52, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Wait, never mind. The article that I saw deleted was one with different capitalization. Never mind. Tee hee. Stormchaser (talk) 01:52, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Scott McGregor

Please do not delet the page for Australian model Scott McGregor. He is Australia's highest profile male model and there are no other resources on the internet that provide a valuable summary on the man himself. He is also a television presenter on Austrtalia's highest rating subscriber TV network. There are many far less noatble people with a Wikipedia entry, it would be a shame to see this page disappear. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Benjwilson (talk • contribs) 03:05, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Censoring the Truth!!

Hello, seems sockpuppets associated with user Dbroamge and user Johnmc are trying to censor the TRUTH!!! Why is it necessary to courtesy blank? Why is Johnmc turning a blind eye? [2]. Fundie Blaster (talk) 07:28, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for May 19th and 26th, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 4, Issue 21	19 May 2008	About the Signpost

Pro-Israeli group's lobbying gets press, arbitration case	Board elections: Voting information, new candidates
Sister Projects Interview: Wikibooks	WikiWorld: "Hodag"
News and notes: Russian passes Swedish, milestones	Wikipedia in the News
Dispatches: Good article milestone	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Volume 4, Issue 22	26 May 2008	About the Signpost

Board elections: Candidate questions	Single User Login opt-in for all users
Community-related news sources grow	WikiWorld: "Tomcat and Bobcat"
News and notes: Wikimedia DE lawsuit, milestones	Wikipedia in the News
Dispatches: Featured sounds	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:56, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 2, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 4, Issue 23	2 June 2008	About the Signpost

Board elections open	WikiWorld: "Facial Hair"
Wikipedia in the News	Dispatches: Style guide and policy changes
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:16, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Assistance needed with reviving B. Scott entry

Hi Jreferee, a few months ago you helped me bring back the Feast of Fools entry and I am looking for assistance with another. The entry for Internet celebrity B. Scott was deleted in January of 2008 and I'm looking to re-write it and re-post it; but I need to get his entry restored so I can work on the copy and get it approved. If you can assist I'd be incredibly grateful! Thanks again for any help you can offer. RcktManChgo (talk) 08:29, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 9, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 4, Issue 24	9 June 2008	About the Signpost

Board elections continue	WikiWorld: "Triskaidekaphobia"
News and notes: Military media mention, milestones	Wikipedia in the News
Dispatches: Main page day	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:08, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Assistance needed with David Rappaport Biography

Hi Jreferee!! I have been searching for information regarding biographies of deceased persons to no avail and am hoping you can help me. David Rappaport is deceased and I am currently working with his family and others on The Wizard (TV series). David's Wiki biography does need a lot of work, but he did not leave a published biography before his death. The only book published which includes David is a slanderous book published without knowledge or permission of his family/estate. I'm pretty certain that no one who has edited his page has used this book. Other information that is used is taken from news articles, interviews, theatre programmes, etc. I would like to help David's family/estate create a Wikipedia biography page that would make everyone proud and give Wikipedia readers correct information. What are the guidelines for Biographies of Deceased Persons where citations can only come from family/estate, published theatre programmes, etc.? Is this something that would qualify for permanent semi-protection? Does Wikipedia need to hear directly from David's family before proceeding? Do I need to request becoming an admin in order to help with this issue? If you could please help with this issue I would greatly appreciate it. Please also feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you need to. Thank you so much for all of your time and help in this matter!! Simon McKay (talk) 23:46, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 23 and 26, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 4, Issue 25	23 June 2008	About the Signpost

From the editor
Board elections completed; results forthcoming	WikiWorld: "John Hodgman"
News and notes: Military media mention, milestones	Dispatches: How Wikipedia's 1.0 assessment scale has evolved
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Volume 4, Issue 26	26 June 2008	About the Signpost

Ting Chen wins 2008 Board Election	ArbCom's BLP "special enforcement" remedy proves controversial
Global group discussions in progress	WikiWorld: "Raining animals"
News and notes: Foundation hires, milestones	Dispatches: Reliable sources in content review processes
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:45, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 30, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 4, Issue 27	30 June 2008	About the Signpost

Private arbitration case criticized, vacated	Other ArbCom announcements reviewed in wake of controversy
Statistical model identifies potential RfA candidates	WikiWorld: "Mike Birbiglia and the Perils of Sleepwalking"
News and notes: Board votes released, milestones	Wikipedia in the News
Dispatches: Sources in biology and medicine	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 04:44, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Removed from Signpost spamlist

Hi! I'm Ral315, editor-in-chief of the Wikipedia Signpost. It appears that you have not edited in at least a few months. To avoid spamming your talk page any further, should you be on leave, your name has been removed from the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to continue receiving the Signpost on your talk page, please leave a note on my talk page to that effect, and I will restore your name, and keep you on the list indefinitely. Ral315 (talk) 07:07, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

My user page

Why did you create my user page? How do I delete it? --G4rfunkel (talk) 17:44, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:David_holt.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:David_holt.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Rettetast (talk) 14:12, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Comment

Royalmate1 has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Awsome userpage I love how its all organized and laid out and your are one of the best admins on the wiki. Hope this made your day better :D Royalmate1 00:22, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Tasmanian Rugby League

You rejected a speedy delete claiming that notability is asserted in the article Tasmanian Rugby League, however I can't see it.

The reality is that:

• This is a defunct amateur competition
• Tasmania is Australia's second smallest state with a tiny population
• It is an insignificant sport which is all but unknown in the state
• The article has no links to it
• The organisation is run by one guy with a miniscule budget such that they can't even afford their own website
• The competition has existed on and off for 2 years in 2 decades
• The page had no credible sources
• The page had no links to it (apart from nav boxes)

As a note of comparison, the article Nauru Australian Football Association was deleted on notability grounds, yet it is the governing body of a country for a national sport with over 70 years of history and a team in a World Cup !

Sometimes I truly don't understand wikipedia's double standards ... --Rulesfan (talk) 05:26, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Piotr Blass

I have nominated Piotr Blass, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Piotr Blass (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 05:14, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

HFED!

	HAPPY FIRST EDIT DAY!	from the BIRTHDAYCOMMITTEE
	Wishing Jreferee/Archive 15 a very Happy First Edit Day! Have a fantastic day! From the Wikipedia Birthday Committee

- -The Spooky One (talk to me) 01:05, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not a Movie, Book or TV Guide

Should Wikipedia become a one stop Movie, Book or TV Guide?
Please make your views known at WT:NOT#Wikipedia is not a Movie, Book or TV Guide. --Gavin Collins (talk) 10:26, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

You or someone requested a photo of the Harry Aubrey Toulmin, Sr. statue in Fountain Square in Springfield. I went there and took several photos, but could not find that statue. Do you you know where it is?

Springfieldohio (talk) 15:57, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Biography page needing attention

Could you please take a look at the biography of Nasdijj and the discussion on its talk page? As I wrote much of the article, it's me that's being accused of bias: however, as the article is semi-protected the person who wants to correct the bias can't do anything unless I agree with it, which seems unhealthy. There are also some personal comments about named people in the comments section which seem a bit out of place: however, again, as the person accused of bias I'm uncomfortable with doing too much to antagonise the other user further. Thanks, Vizjim (talk) 09:05, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Image:PPSJIIIinstructions.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:PPSJIIIinstructions.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:07, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Image:Powersin 1901.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Powersin 1901.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. JaGa^talk 22:56, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

David Ferguson (impresario)

Hello! Would you be able to take a quick look at the David Ferguson (impresario) page and the associated controversy? I have been accused of sock-puppetry for holding the same opinions as the main authority on the article by a fellow with a strange obsession with Ferguson's Legal History. I have been trying to improve the article but I am afraid of being stopped by this fellow. Both of two main participants appear to have a COI of sorts, as DrJamesX wrote the article as an independent biographer and has seen his work vandalised, and UwishiwasjohnG (formerly CassandraR, long story) appears to have a personal vendetta against the subject of the article; I think he may have been involved in some of the petty litigation he continually posts. I am new at this Wikipedia thing but I'm very interested in this particular case, it's given me a chance to learn the ropes and some of the rules around wiki. I have enjoyed the channce to contribute on such a hot-button article, and I don't wish to have my editing privileges revoked by someone with an agenda who, as I have come to understand, may be violating the standards of the WP:BLP rules. I would therefore like to request your help in moderating the issue before it affects more users like me. Switchintoglide (talk) 04:33, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:FrederickVanNuys.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:FrederickVanNuys.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

User:Rcktmanil/B. Scott

Hi Jreferee, about a year ago you helped me get the article for Feast of Fools (podcast) back online, and I am in need of your assistance again. I have recently finished re-writing the page for Internet Celebrity B. Scott and need someone to look it over and offer suggestions and/or assistance in getting it back online. The page was located at B. Scott previously. I also have questions about image usage for an image I tried to use on the draft but got deleted. I appreciate any support you can offer! Thanks for your time. RcktManChgo (talk) 09:29, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 09:10, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:MillwallBrickMagazine.JPG)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:MillwallBrickMagazine.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? J Milburn (talk) 00:56, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Biography of Richard T. Whitcomb

I saw that you were an admin on project biography - I was hoping you could include the article "Richard T. Whitcomb" in this project and increase the importance factor. I was shocked to come across the article as a stub with no importance factors - he is well known in mechanical and aerospace engineering for his accomplishments (see area rule and wingtip device for starters). I'll add what I can to the article but it would be great if it got a lot more attention than it is. I apologize if there is a better suited place for requesting this, but I didn't see it on the biography project page. Tevonic (talk) 21:07, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Asking for your advice,

Dear Jreferee, Given your experience with writing bios, would you please provide me with some comments and suggestions with respect to the discussion page of Guity Novin article which has rated as a start-class. I want to make it into the criterion for GA-class and since the wiki instruction says:

• comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing.

I used the Frida Kahlo's article which is on a similar topic (a woman painter) as my model. Frida's article starts with her father (Guillermo Kahlo (1872-1941), was born Carl Wilhelm Kahlo in Pforzheim, Germany. etc. ) and her mother (Frida's mother, Matilde Calderón y Gonzalez, was a devout Catholic of primarily indigenous, etc.) The article then talk about the Mexican Revolution and so on. Here is the new article I have written New Article. I have written history of graphic design and some other articles but not a bio and I intend to write the bio of some graphic artists. I really appreciate if you can help me and let me know if I am on the right track to make the above article into a GA-Class. Many thanks--Artaxerex (talk) 03:38, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of List of Sunday (only) newspapers in the United States

I have nominated List of Sunday (only) newspapers in the United States, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Sunday (only) newspapers in the United States. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Johnelwayrules (talk) 01:16, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:ChristianPotenzaHolland.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:ChristianPotenzaHolland.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:13, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:FinlayAJMcdonaldpub.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:FinlayAJMcdonaldpub.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 71.176.83.93 (talk) 02:30, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

The Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter (September 2009)

David Petraeus

• 22:29, 13 September 2007 Jreferee protected David Petraeus ‎ (High rates of revision of, vandalism by, and/or undo of unregistered users. Page noted at http://www.wikirage.com [edit=autoconfirmed:move=autoconfirmed])

If you're still around, I've started a review of this protection to see if it's still considered necessary. See talk:David Petraeus. --TS 01:35, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

Request for Participation in Wikipedia Research

Jreferee,

Your Request for Adminship (RfA) process was reviewed and studied by our research team at Carnegie Mellon University early in our project to gain insights into the process. We reviewed what voters discussed about your case, and what qualifications you brought to the table as a candidate. In total 50 cases were personally read and reviewed, and we based our further research questions in part on your case.

In continuing our research, I would like to personally invite you to participate in a survey we are conducting to get perspective from people who have participate in the RfA process. The survey will only take a few minutes of your time, and will aid furthering our understanding of online communities, and may assist in the development of tools to assist voters in making RfA evaluations. We are NOT attempting to spam anyone with this survey and are doing our best to be considerate and not instrusive in the Wikipedia community. The results of this survey are for academic research and are not used for any profit nor sold to any companies. We will also post our results back to the Wikipedia community.

This survey is part of an ongoing research project by students and faculty at the Carnegie Mellon University School of Computer Science and headed by Professor Robert Kraut.

Take the survey

Thank you!

If you have any questions or concerns, feel free comment on my talk page.

CMUResearcher (talk) 19:10, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!

Happy First Edit Day, Jreferee, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day!

GrooveDog • oh hai 01:21, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

Happy first edit day

	HAPPY FIRST EDIT DAY!	from the BIRTHDAYCOMMITTEE
	Wishing Jreferee/Archive 15 a very Happy First Edit Day! Have a fantastic day! From the Wikipedia Birthday Committee

Vatsan34 (talk) 08:15, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Teachers TV cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Teachers TV cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:53, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Douglas Sandy Warner 2001.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Douglas Sandy Warner 2001.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Angus McLellan (Talk) 19:33, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

Coffee is bullying and threatening an editor about removing PROD tags

As an admin can you look at this please? I message a couple of other admins too. User_talk:Power.corrupts#Warning Ikip 05:43, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter

The Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter Issue 2 (January 2010) Previous issue | Next issue

Content

The community is currently

deciding whether

60,000

articles should be deleted.

background

• News items and announcements
• Contest

• Featured editor: Teeninvestor
• Featured administrator: WereSpielChequers

• Want ads
• Feature: FeydHuxtable: Search Techniques

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.  ChaosMaster_Chat 02:34, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Htoulminbookletpg1.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Htoulminbookletpg1.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 16:21, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Also File:Htoulminbookletpg2.JPG, File:Htoulminbookletpg3.JPG, and File:Htoulminbookletpg4.JPG. —Bkell (talk) 16:21, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Also File:Bdarst5.jpg. —Bkell (talk) 16:29, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Harry A Toulmin Sr.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Harry A Toulmin Sr.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:29, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Reassesment

Hi, I've expanded this article a bit and sourced it. Can you reassess it. --Commander _{(Ping Me)} 07:00, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

Suspension of admin privileges due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative privileges of users who have been inactive for one year, meaning administrators who have made neither any edits nor any logged actions in over one year. As a result of this discussion, your administrative privileges have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these privileges reinstated, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. RL0919 (talk) 21:45, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Abdulsalami Abubakar.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Abdulsalami Abubakar.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have questions, please post them here.
• I will automatically remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please ask an admin to turn it off here.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 02:28, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

working to get this biography into the wikipedia projects official page

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edith_Flagg if you can take a look at it, much appreciated.....

i also worked on these pages for the galapagos, they would be for wikipedia projects of ecuador ....http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tortuga_Bay

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Itabaca_Channel

cheers and have a great day! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.155.7.252 (talk) 04:33, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Happy Slip Logo.JPG)

Thanks for uploading File:Happy Slip Logo.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:08, 4 October 2012 (UTC)