User talk:Jpbowen/Archive 7

londontown .(com)

Hi, there's a discussion taking place about the number of links to the above website. It really concerns recent links by a specific poster but as you have placed the majority of their links I thought you may wish to add to the discussion athttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Spam#Possibly_spam_links_to_www.londontown.com_.2F_londonhotelsinsight.com thanks. Thundernlightning (talk) 10:05, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know, I added some comments to the discussion. — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 13:06, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Fellows of the Royal Society of Arts

I noticed that you had not participated in the reposted discussion yet, so I thought I'd point you to it in case you had missed it: Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2011 March 25#Category:Fellows of the Royal Society of Arts. Cheers, -- Black Falcon ^(talk) 18:39, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I had missed it. I have contributed and have listed it underWikipedia:WikiProject_Deletion_sorting/Arts#Categories. — Jonathan Bowen(talk) 22:30, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Borough Group

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Borough Group, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.cliffholden.co.uk/borough.shtml.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See ourcopyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:36, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I believe the text is now sufficiently different and referenced from multiple sources, but if there is a specific issue, please let me know the details. — Jonathan Bowen(talk) 22:14, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

NPP

Hi Jpbowen/Archive 7. Thank you for patrolling new pages. I'm curious to know why you passed Lero (software engineering) as suitable for inclusion. Patrolling not only prevents the wrong kind of pages staying online, but is also an opportunity to do some basic improvements and tag them for attention.There is currently a drive to enhance the quality of patrolling - you can help: please read the new tips and tricks at WP:NPP and if there's anything that is not clear, don't hesitate to ask me on my talk page. You may even wish to make your own suggestions for NPP improvement. Happy editing! --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:21, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I see now that this is a page you created yourself. Do note that as a reviewer, you should be aware of creation policy for new pages. Please be sure to review WP:Reviewer - the right can be rescinded. Thanks. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:24, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, I pressed "Save page" accidentally instead of "Preview", a slip of the fingers. I have now wikified the page. — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 09:31, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Glyn Lewis

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to readthe guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Glyn Lewis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. UtherSRG (talk) 15:13, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I believe there are enough references, etc., I can add more information, etc. I have added a note on the talk page. — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 15:36, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for helping with the Bribie Island Seaside Museum page, Jonathan.Robertwhyteus (talk) 21:24, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome. I have just updated and combined duplicate references in the Bribie Island Seaside Museum article too. — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 22:09, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

We're recruiting art lovers!

Archives of American Art Wikimedia Partnership - We needyou!

Hi! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at the Smithsonian Archives of American Art and I'm recruiting Wikipedians who are passionate about art to participate in furthering art coverage on Wikipedia. I am planning contests and projects that will allow you access, no matter where you live, to the world's largest collection of archives related to American art. Please sign up to participate here, and I look forward to working with you!SarahStierch (talk) 00:14, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I have added my name. — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 08:54, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Message at Talk:Debut novel

Left a question at Talk:Debut_novel#Choice_of_image, Sadads (talk) 14:49, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See there for a response! — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 15:06, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Replied, thanks for fixing consistency on the article BTW. Do you regularly do novels stuff? We can always use more support at WP:Novels, we have a huge backlog of articles tagged with problems right now, Sadads (talk) 15:40, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am normally to be seen working on museums and art, but am interested in all cultural aspects. I am working through Category:Novels to diffuse articles with more specific categories and also do a general tidy. I hope this helps a bit anyway! — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 16:03, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Archives of American Art Update!

Hi! I just wanted to deliver a little news about the Archives of American Art partnership project! We have released our amazing barnstar to the world, learn how you can earn one here! We will be having a Backstage Pass tour later this month which will be announced this week, and an upcoming contest in which major contributors can win some amazing goodies from the Archives and Smithsonian, allowing for international involvement! Thanks again for your interest and I look forward to your continued participation in this ongoing project to better coverage on American art history on Wikipedia! SarahStierch (talk) 18:12, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Alice Prochaska

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Alice Prochaska, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.some.ox.ac.uk/843-2972/all/1/Dr_Alice_Prochaska.aspx.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See ourcopyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:43, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have reworded the article so I believe the text is different re copyright issues. Perhaps someone can check this. — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 13:57, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sally Jones

The article Sally Jones has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No claim to notability, just a standard level presumably competent journalist

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.Milowent • ^talkblp-r 18:45, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I will not oppose retention if sources can be added, however.--Milowent• ^talkblp-r 18:46, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I have reverted to a previous version with references and better indication of notability. The article seems to have suffered rather! — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 21:51, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of a paragraph

Hello. Check out this diff and let me know what you think: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Literary_editor&action=historysubmit&diff=441580665&oldid=347823975 Sincerely,GeorgeLouis (talk) 19:03, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I have added a reference section and a "fact" query to the literary editor article. I agree that "state editor" seems unrelated (directly anyway), although personally I would have moved this and added a "fact" query or reference. — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 08:55, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yet again

I think you may wish to contributehere.Moonraker (talk) 08:17, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I have added my thoughts. — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 16:43, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Diana, Princess of Wales Memorial Fountain.JPG

A tag has been placed on File:Diana, Princess of Wales Memorial Fountain.JPG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —innotata 15:46, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Barley Mow, Long Wittenham

The article Barley Mow, Long Wittenham has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

It's just a pub. Old, yes. Notable, no.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 09:19, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have updated the article considerably and added references to demonstrate notability. For example, it has been called "the best known of all Thames pubs", it is covered by Pevsner, it is a listed building, etc. — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 20:45, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

But Daphne Guinness drinks there so it must be notable, or so your intellectual chum Alf would have us believe. Top of da mawnin sorr! Oh she's in Wiki because she's more important than a dead cat. Of cawse. Grow up before I throw up. —Preceding unsigned comment added by93.186.22.242 (talk) 14:27, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Unhelpful edits have been made from the above IP address between May and September 2011. Please desist, read, and follow Wikipedia guidelines before making any further edits. —Jonathan Bowen (talk) 15:07, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination ofFile:VaticanMuseumStaircase.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:VaticanMuseumStaircase.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:23, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Uffizi Hallway.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Uffizi Hallway.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:48, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Uffizi Gallery, Florence.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Uffizi Gallery, Florence.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedydeletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:49, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Error on Edinburgh University Music Society

Hi, re your recent edit to Edinburgh University Music Society: you can't format the value of|background= in {{infobox musical artist}} in the way you did as it changed the infobox display. I've now corrected it. Thanks Rjwilmsi 08:27, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know! — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 15:07, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Joan Miró and Qrpedia

Hello! I've seen that are you are a member of the Wikiproject: Visual Arts and I would like to ask you for some help. The Wikipedia in Catalan have reached an agreement with the Joan Miró Foundation: They will include QRpedia codes next to the highlights of his upcoming exhibition about Joan Miró. It's the most important exhibit in the last 20 years, and has passed summer at Tate in London, this autumn will be in Barcelona, and then will go toNGA in Washington. The articles have been made in Catalan and are being translated into English, and I would like you to help us whether monitoring the translation, translating articles or expanding or translating them to other languages. The more languages we have, the better the experience for the user. You can find more information about the Wikiproject here. Thank you in advance!.--Kippelboy (talk) 11:40, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It sounds like a great project, I saw the Miró exhibition at Tate Modern in London. I am afraid I only speak English with any fluency, but I can proofread and improve pages translated into English. — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 12:45, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Museum architects

Category:Museum architects, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atthe category's entry on the Categories for discussionpage. Thank you. Elekhh (talk) 10:49, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of SMH Books

The article SMH Books has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Seems to be nothing more than an advert. Fails WP:GNG

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.Charles (talk) 21:32, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a reference. I believe the article is adequately referenced from several sources. —Jonathan Bowen (talk) 22:45, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Works inspired by J. R. R. Tolkien

Category:Works inspired by J. R. R. Tolkien, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 15:02, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The linkWikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2011_October_20#Category:Works_inspired_by_J._R._R._Tolkienin the renaming box does not exist, so how can this be discussed? — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 12:08, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Works inspired by people

Category:Works inspired by people, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker(talk) 15:20, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have contributed to the discussion. The change would narrow the category, perhaps invalidating entries. — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 12:08, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello Jpbowen/Archive 7! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Architecture

Hi Jonathan! Please don't reduce lead pics to thumbnail size. Everything else in that article has been kept to thumbnail, and for the most part selected so as to be clear at that size. However, the lead pic of Florence cathedral has been enlarged for visual clarity, for comparison between the external view and the plan, and in order to support a number of lines of explanatory text. Given the significance of this building, as defined by the text underneath it, it warrant the extra pixels. Amandajm (talk) 10:05, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am not convinced that the Duomo in Florence, wonderful as it is, deserves such prominence in a general article on architecture. Anyone wishing to see the picture in more detail can just click on it. Can you convince me otherwise? — Jonathan Bowen (talk)

Oslo International Poetry Festival

Oslo is the capital of Norway, it is not in Sweden. xx --93.97.60.172 (talk) 23:06, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the correction, I must have had Sweden on my mind for just reason! —Jonathan Bowen (talk) 12:08, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:DBLP name

Template:DBLP name has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:48, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of T-commerce

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to readthe guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on T-commerce requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contactone of these administrators to request that the administratoruserfy the page or email a copy to you. ΣΑΠΦ (Sapph)^Talk 14:44, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Jpbowen. You have new messages at LadyofShalott's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello, Jpbowen. You have new messages at Alison's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Category Hiking Trails in Italy

See my proposal to upmerge Category:Footpaths in Italy to Category:Hiking trails in Italy Hugo999 (talk) 03:56, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note that a footpath is not necessarily a hiking trail. — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 10:44, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Summit Series request

Hi there, I've been trying to get some feedback on aproposed article expansion I've prepared about a non-profit with which I have a potential COI, so far without luck. I've justposted a note to WikiProject Organizations' Talk page, which I recognize is semi-active at best. If you'd be interested in looking at it and sharing your thoughts about whether it's ready to go live, I'd appreciate it. Cheers, WWB Too (talk) 16:42, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, never mind—another editor has taken up the request. Best, WWB Too (talk) 20:49, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK, good luck! — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 10:44, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In Hakan Erdogmus, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Springer(check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:33, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have corrected this. — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 10:44, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Epidaurus Theater.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Epidaurus Theater.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:30, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It looks OK to me, is this a mistake? — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 10:44, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Cambridge

Wikiproject Cambridge is now part of Wikipedia:WikiProject East Anglia.Wilbysuffolk Talk to me 21:08, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Robin Gandy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peppard (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:33, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Corrected to Rotherfield Peppard, thank you. — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 11:30, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Barley Mow, Clifton Hampden for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Barley Mow, Clifton Hampden is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Barley Mow, Clifton Hampden until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 19:42, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination withdrawn after a WP:Speedy Keep suggestion. — Jonathan Bowen(talk) 00:06, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing todisambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read theFAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Alex Wilkie (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to FRS

Sara Diamond (academic)(check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to University of the Arts

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Links corrected, thank you. — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 00:03, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dubai Museum

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to readthe guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Dubai Museum requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Epeefleche (talk) 05:27, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that previous versions of Dubai Museum were not copyright violations. Would it not have been better to role back to the last version without copyright problems? Could you restore that last such version into my area for re-installation rather than having to start from scratch again? Many thanks. — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 12:08, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

PS Are you sure that http://www.weknowdubai.com/70743/dubai-museum/ was not copied from the Wikipedia entry and what evidence do you have of this either way? Is there an easy way to check such things. I would be interested in information if so. — Jonathan Bowen(talk) 12:17, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Museum

If you look at the page that it appears to be copied from, that is the more robust one -- with further specific info such as hours, contact info, etc. And the style in both is not the encyclopedic tone, but that used by advert-like sites. If you ask the deleting nom to userfy it for you, I'm sure he/she will be happy to do so, and you can restore a non-copyvio version. Or you can start from scratch and create a non-copyvio version. Best.--Epeefleche (talk) 16:24, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree apart from the opening time details, WeKnowDubai Dubai Museum page copies the Wikipedia page in encyclopaedic style, even with the same photograph from Wikimedia Commons. I see the Dubai Museum Wikipedia page has been restored so I guess someone else does too. If you look at the revision history of the Dubai Museum Wikipedia page, the information was built up over several days by Orionist in May 2010. A copyvio would normally be a single cut-and-paste with little evidence of original work as there is here. I would suggest that you should do more research on the revision history of a Wikipedia page before suggesting copyvio in future. I hope this helps in your contribution to Wikipedia. —Jonathan Bowen (talk) 11:31, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Ivor Grattan-Guinness, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Fontana and Duckworth(check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have corrected these. — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 11:31, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to join Stanford's WikiProject!

As a current or past contributor to a related article, I thought I'd let you know about WikiProject Stanford University, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Stanford University. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks and related articles. Thanks!

ralphamale (talk) 21:49, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the invitation, although I am not a great expert on this! —Jonathan Bowen (talk) 11:31, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Alexander Abingdon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mason (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter

Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter Volume I, Issue III February 2012 Front cover \| Feature \| News and announcements \| Humor \| Want ads
To contribute to the next newsletter, please visit the Newsletter draft page. ARS Members automatically receive this newsletter. To opt out, please remove your name from the recipients list.

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing todisambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read theFAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Ann Leslie (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Current affairs

Jon Gomm (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to The Telegraph

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Corrected, thanks. —Jonathan Bowen (talk) 19:24, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

New cfds regarding "Old Fooians"

Two new cfds propose the renaming of some twenty categories. Most of those who took part in last year's cfd "Former pupils by school in the United Kingdom" seem unaware of them, so I am notifying all those who took part in that discussion, to improve the quality of the discussion by broadening participation to more fully achieve consensus. Please consider contributinghereand here.Moonraker (talk) 13:20, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for letting me know, I have contributed to the discussions. — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 18:35, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 5

Hi. When you recently edited Tree tunnel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Avenue (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have updated the link. — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 18:35, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Museum places

What is Museum places? And why is Covent Garden categorised as a Museum place?SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 16:31, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Museum places includes places related to museums (e.g., through their name or location). Covent Garden is the location of the London Transport Museum, as mentioned in the article. I hope this helps. — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 16:39, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You know that there is already a category for locating museums in a particular area? For the Transport Museum, there is: Category:Museums in Westminster. Judging from thediscussion on this category, the category was kept because it would hold places that are museums, such as Museumsquartier, Metropolitan Zoological Park and Museum District,Museum District, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, etc, not that it would duplicate existing museum location categories. SilkTork'^{✔Tea time}' 00:52, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 12

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing todisambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read theFAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Exhibition Road (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Science Museum

Museum Lane (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Science Museum

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:36, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 10:27, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

List of rock formations in the United Kingdom

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:List of rock formations in the United Kingdom. proposal regarding the scope of the list. -- Bejnar (talk) 19:08, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I support the proposal and have said so on the talk page. — Jonathan Bowen(talk) 10:28, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 19

Hi. When you recently edited Conroy Baronets, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Montgomery (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 10:27, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Random selected self-education question

I would like to pick the brain of more experienced users about the ongoing exchange between [User:Grandmaster] and a couple of administrators. Grandmaster suggests to restrict access to some and potentially to all articles in Armenia-Azerbaijan by excluding new users [2]. You can reply on my home page if you wish. Dehr (talk) 19:50, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not my field, I'm afraid. — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 17:28, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Old Dragons

Category:Old Dragons, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atthe category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 23:57, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Commented. — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 17:28, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 4

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing todisambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read theFAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Fine Arts College (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Camden

I Blame Coco (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Keyboard

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:20, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Corrected, thanks. — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 17:28, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Healthcare in Oxfordshire

Category:Healthcare in Oxfordshire, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Karl.brown (talk) 02:06, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Noted, thank you. — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 17:28, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 11

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing todisambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read theFAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

George Cawkwell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Procurator and Bryn Mawr

Liu Xiang (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Putuo

Loel Guinness (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Oriental Institute

St Bernard's Road (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to King Charles I

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Corrected, thank you for the useful service. — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 17:28, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Adrian Bryan-Brown for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleAdrian Bryan-Brown is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adrian Bryan-Brown until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jay Tepper (talk) 16:39, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Commented and improved the article. — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 17:28, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Old Harrovians

Category:Old Harrovians, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atthe category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Andy Dingley (talk) 09:52, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Commented, thank you. — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 17:28, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 18

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing todisambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read theFAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

The Silent Traveller in Oxford(check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Blitz, Methuen and Line drawing

Hollesley Bay, Suffolk(check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Trawler

Liu Xiang (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Putuo District

Signal Books (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Current affairs

The Silent Traveller in London(check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Blitz

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:16, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Corrected, thanks! — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 17:28, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Science lovers wanted!

Hi! I'm serving as the wikipedian-in-residence at the Smithsonian Institution Archives until June! One of my goals as resident, is to work with Wikipedians and staff to improve content on Wikipedia about people who have collections held in the Archives -most of these are scientists (from anthropologists to zoologists) who held roles within the Smithsonian and/or federal government. I thought you might like to participate since you are interested in the sciences! Sign up to participate here and dive into articles needing expansion and creation on our to-do list. Feel free to make a request for images or materials at therequest page, and of course, if you share your successes at theoutcomes page you will receive the SIA barnstar! Thanks for your interest, and I look forward to your participation! SarahStierch (talk) 19:23, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 25

Hi. When you recently edited Quantum3D, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageEVC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Four Freedoms (Norman Rockwell)

Thanks for your contributions to Four Freedoms (Norman Rockwell). Unfortunately, due to some data loss, I had to do a major revert and many of your changes were lost. I hope you will attempt to improove this article as you had before.--TonyTheTiger(T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 04:26, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Artchive for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Artchive is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Artchive until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Studerby (talk) 21:53, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Software system

The article Software system has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

It really is a synonym for software and should be redirected there. A merge has been proposed but there is nothing to merge in my opinion.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.M4gnum0n (talk) 10:30, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have clarified the difference between "software system" and "software" with references in the article and removed the notice. — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 14:44, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Software system for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleSoftware system is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Software system until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Andy Dingley (talk) 15:36, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of He Jifeng and Unifying Theories of Programming for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articles He Jifeng and Unifying Theories of Programming are suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or should be deleted.

The articles will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/He Jifeng until a consensus is reached, and your contribution to the discussion is welcome. --Lambiam 21:25, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Zhou Chaochen for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleZhou Chaochen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zhou Chaochen until a consensus is reached, and your contribution to the discussion is welcome. --Lambiam 15:02, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your Erdős number

The MathSciNet collaboration distance calculator gives you an Erdős number of 3. Could you please give a citation for a joint publication with an Erdős co-author? Ntsimp (talk) 15:23, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the link, see: Jonathan P. Bowen and Robin J. Wilson,Visualising Virtual Communities: From Erdős to the Arts. In Stuart Dunn, Jonathan P. Bowen, and Kia Ng (eds.), London 2012 Conference Proceedings, Electronic Workshops in Computing (eWiC), British Computer Society, 2012, pages 238–244. — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 11:16, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Keith Ingram

The article Keith Ingram has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:BIO

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.TM 02:49, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have added further reference to demonstrate notability. In particular, his obituary appeared in The Times and he is extensively mentioned in the obituary of Michael Gover in The Independent, two of the UK's leading national newspapers, was well as being mentioned in books. — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 10:23, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Keith Ingram for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleKeith Ingram is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keith Ingram until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. TM 21:54, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 19

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing todisambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read theFAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Chris Gollon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to East London

College of Public Speaking(check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Gordon House

Isaac Wake (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Barrington

Panos Aravantinos (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Constructivism

Royal National Children's Foundation(check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Cobham

St John on Bethnal Green(check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Belfry

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 04:06, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Links corrected, thank you. — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 23:25, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

Paradise Street, Oxford(check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Greyfriars and Blackfriars

Adrian Morris (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Stephen Cox

High Street, Oxford (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Carfax

John Mason (diplomat)(check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Drayton

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Links corrected, thank you. — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 23:25, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

Fyfield Road (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Catalan

Rawlinson Road (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Oxford High School

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:30, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Links corrected, thank you. — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 22:17, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

Frenchay Road (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Orientalist

Garford Road (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to St John's College

Marks Hall (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Deer park

Museum Street (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Steeple

North Oxford (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Summertown

Worcester College, Oxford(check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Word of God

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Links corrected, thank you. — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 22:17, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Moreton Road, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Boyd (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Corrected, thank you. — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 14:33, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lonsdale Square, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Firebomb(check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:45, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Corrected, thank you. — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 16:29, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

First ever Oxford Wiki Meetup

You are invited to the first ever Oxford Wiki Meetup which will take place at The Four Candles, 51 George Street, Oxford, OX1 2BE on Sunday 4 November 2012 from 1.00 pm.

I hope as many people as possible will be able to attend so that we can make this a regular event. If you have never been to one, this is an opportunity to meet other Wikipedians in an informal atmosphere for Wiki and non-Wiki related chat and for beer or food if you like. Experienced and new contributors are all welcome. This event is definitely not restricted just to discussion of Oxford related topics. Bring your laptop if you like and use the free Wifi or just bring yourself. Even better, bring a friend! Click the link for full details. Looking forward to seeing you. Philafrenzy (talk) 10:12, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the information, I have registered. — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 10:17, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited St Frideswide's Church, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page St Thomas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:35, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Corrected, thank you. — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 10:17, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Faculty by university in Ireland

Category:Faculty by university in Ireland, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on theCategories for discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl(talk) • (contribs) 16:05, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Noted. — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 10:17, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Topic ban of User:Novaseminary for persistent disruptive editing at Douglas Tait (stuntman)

Hi JP,

Some time ago, you were involved in an AfD discussion here. Ever since then, one of the users who voted to delete has waged a one-man campaign against the BLP and is now at[1] because of his unrelenting, disruptive edits. Please review the discussion and contribute. Thank you.2602:304:5EA1:52A9:4191:1232:48D4:51E3(talk) 03:41, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the information. — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 10:17, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

F. X. Reid nominated for deletion

[2]. You may wish to contribute to the discussion. Mzilikazi1939 (talk) 11:27, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have contributed, thank you. — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 10:17, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wolvercote Common, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Owen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Corrected, thank you. — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 10:17, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]