User talk:Jpbowen/Archive 13

Nomination of SMH Books for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article SMH Books is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SMH Books until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tacyarg (talk) 21:14, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly a small publisher. —Jonathan Bowen (talk) 11:15, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Skakavac, Sarajevo, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Sutjeska and Skakavac.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Corrected, thank you. —Jonathan Bowen (talk) 13:13, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1840 establishments in Estonia

A tag has been placed on Category:1840 establishments in Estonia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

This message was automatically delivered by QEDKbot. 14:30, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1840 in Estonia

A tag has been placed on Category:1840 in Estonia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

This message was automatically delivered by QEDKbot. 14:42, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Martine Syms, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Institute of Contemporary Art.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:28, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Corrected, thank you. —Jonathan Bowen (talk) 13:13, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Francis, Day & Hunter Ltd., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Broadway.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:24, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Corrected, thank you. —Jonathan Bowen (talk) 12:11, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 23

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Ann Pasternak Slater

added a link pointing to Oxford High School

Park Town, Oxford

added a link pointing to ITV

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:35, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Corrected, thank you. —Jonathan Bowen (talk) 11:26, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Indica Gallery, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Dunbar.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:17, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Corrected by Narky Blert, thank you. —Jonathan Bowen (talk) 11:26, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your status in WikiProject Inclusion

Hello, Jpbowen. Wikipedia:WikiProject Inclusion is believed to be inactive. It looks like you sympathize with inclusionism, but do not take an active role in this project. Thus, I will move you to the list of inactive participants after a month. Feel free to move back to the list of active participants when you are ready to contribute. 84.120.7.178 (talk) 22:25, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am still active personally on this issue! —Jonathan Bowen (talk) 11:13, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good. I am assessing the health of the project; I will contact you when this process is done. 84.120.7.178 (talk) 21:35, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Inclusion#Status as of 2020 --Guy Macon (talk) 04:26, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1819 in Austria

A tag has been placed on Category:1819 in Austria requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:38, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it should be the Austrian Empire at this time. I have added a {{db-author}}. —Jonathan Bowen (talk) 20:02, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1826 in Austria

A tag has been placed on Category:1826 in Austria requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:50, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it should be the Austrian Empire at this time. I have added a {{db-author}}. —Jonathan Bowen (talk) 11:15, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bobby Tulloch, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Corrected, thank you. —Jonathan Bowen (talk) 11:11, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of San Francisco Book Review for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article San Francisco Book Review is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/San Francisco Book Review until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. czar 22:45, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Digital transformation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Digital technology.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Corrected, thank you. —Jonathan Bowen (talk) 12:14, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:16, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Justin Picard

Hi there. Would you be willing to take the time and have a look at this draft? It had been pending review for over 3 months before it was declined yesterday, but I'm concerned that the two reviewers who've taken a look so far aren't 100% clear on notability criteria for academics, so I'd feel more comfortable getting an opinion from a reviewer with a track record in academia (especially computer engineering) like yourself. The pending review backlog also hasn't looked like diminishing significantly for months. Davykamanzi → talk • contribs • alter ego 12:54, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Since he is an industrialist rather than an academic, you probably need general notability guidelines under WP:BIO, especially WP:BASIC. Articles specifically on him (e.g., with his name in the title) in reliable publications (e.g., a national newspaper or magazine) would help. If there are none yet, perhaps best to save the article until there are some. I hope this helps and good luck! —Jonathan Bowen (talk) 13:28, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Invisible Barnstar
		For all your work on museums Akrasia25 (talk) 18:04, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reading Town Regatta

Proposed deletion of Reading Town Regatta

The article Reading Town Regatta has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence from third-party sources provided to show that this is a notable event.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cripesohblimey (talk) 10:08, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I added further references and information. —Jonathan Bowen (talk) 12:14, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hinksey

The article Hinksey has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Interesting though it is, I haven't been able to find any sources that would indicate this place name is individually notable (though of course the several places bearing the name are likely to be). I can't access the Gelling chapter cited, but the entry in the Dictionary of British Place-Names is very brief and deals with North Hinksey and South Hinksey rather than the name itself. As far as I can tell there's no scope for a disambiguation page here as all the various Hinkseys would be partial title matches.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 18:55, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I added further references and information. —Jonathan Bowen (talk) 12:14, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hinksey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carfax.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:31, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Corrected, thank you. —Jonathan Bowen (talk) 12:14, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 31

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Field Studies Council, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Natural History Museum.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:20, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Corrected, thank you. —Jonathan Bowen (talk) 12:14, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Historic sites in American Samoa

A tag has been placed on Category:Historic sites in American Samoa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:08, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I added an entry, there may be more too. —Jonathan Bowen (talk) 12:14, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 31

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chris Welch, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peter Grant.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Corrected, thank you. —Jonathan Bowen (talk) 12:14, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Robert Orchard for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Robert Orchard is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Orchard until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Tacyarg (talk) 19:43, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I added references to demonstrate notability. —Jonathan Bowen (talk) 15:54, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Parks in Kuwait

A tag has been placed on Category:Parks in Kuwait requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

I re-added entries, deleted through bad editing. —Jonathan Bowen (talk) 15:54, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:28, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reinhard Strohm

Thank you for Reinhard Strohm! I had been redlinking him everytime I used cited his book(s)... nice to see it as a blue link now :) Aza24 (talk) 06:42, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, you are welcome. —Jonathan Bowen (talk) 15:54, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lamb & Flag, Oxford, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christminster.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Updated link, thank you. —Jonathan Bowen (talk) 11:27, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

MGP

Please see this. --Omnipaedista (talk) 01:44, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, it would be good to have an (ideally online) citation that actually confirms this. —Jonathan Bowen (talk) 15:24, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Michael S. K. Grant

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Michael S. K. Grant requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 06:33, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I added more and better references. —Jonathan Bowen (talk) 15:24, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dubai Creative Clusters Authority, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Free zone.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Corrected, thank you. —Jonathan Bowen (talk) 15:24, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Iain Borden, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Crystal Palace.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Corrected, thank you. —Jonathan Bowen (talk) 20:57, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:MuseumsWiki

Hi Jonathan, Template:MuseumsWiki has been nominated for deletion. Please comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Best, --ThT (talk) 15:10, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I added a "Keep" message. —Jonathan Bowen (talk) 16:41, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gülermak

The article Gülermak has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline nor the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:51, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gülermak for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gülermak is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gülermak until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:50, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of ISO/IEC 4909

The article ISO/IEC 4909 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:55, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gülermak, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kolin.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Association for the Education and Guardianship of International Students for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Association for the Education and Guardianship of International Students is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Association for the Education and Guardianship of International Students until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Pi (Talk to me!) 23:09, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Council of International Schools, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page International.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Red Sand (Riyadh), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Filipino.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: IGI Global (July 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Multiple references have been added, but almost none of them is independent and so WP:CORPDEPTH is still not met. As noted in previous declines/comments, there needs to be some mention of the criticism against the company, which appears to be their main claim to notability; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5487745/ is certainly a reliable source for this.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:IGI Global and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:IGI Global, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 09:49, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Babbage (film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Babbage (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Babbage (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

BOVINEBOY2008 19:19, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shai Azoulay, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arad.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Souq Qabil, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eid.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Real estate companies disestablished in 2013

A tag has been placed on Category:Real estate companies disestablished in 2013 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:41, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merges

Hello. You created Creative computing a few years back; please see relevant merge I suggested: Talk:Computational_creativity#Merge_from_Artificial_imagination_and_Creative_computing. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:48, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Winchester School, Jebel Ali has been accepted

The Winchester School, Jebel Ali, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 19:33, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Service companies disestablished in 2013

A tag has been placed on Category:Service companies disestablished in 2013 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:31, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nakheel Properties (September 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Salimfadhley was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nakheel Properties and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nakheel Properties, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Salimfadhley (talk) 19:45, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jpbowen! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Salimfadhley (talk) 19:45, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]