User talk:TarzanBoy24

Poor guy. Contributed a lot to this site and has been blacklisted for it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C5:2284:C600:4D02:1BD1:8500:79F2 (talk) 00:04, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

JoshuaIsTheFalco and TarzanBoy24 Differences

There is a big difference between JoshuaIsTheFalco and TarzanBoy24. Falco edited railways, demographics and created pages. JoshuaIsTheFalco died in early January and in its place. TarzanBoy24 was created, it now scans Wikipedia and adds, fixes and challenges contributors on there sources, geography and maths. It has no interest in railways or demographics. Just geography, sources and removing original research. So they are different from one and other. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TarzanBoy24 (talk • contribs) 23:02, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What utter rubbish. The global rename log shows that JoshuaIsTheFalco was renamed to TarzanBoy24 (per request at meta). Since they are therefore the same person, the actions of the former are inherited by the latter; and indeed, the contributions by JoshuaIsTheFalco are nil and the list of contributions by TarzanBoy24 include many where the signature of JoshuaIsTheFalco was used. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 21:21, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Here's some advice - I don't particularly want to block you again, so pack it in with the edit summaries like this (especially when there actually nothing wrong with the sentence you changed), this and this. Thanks, Black Kite (talk) 21:16, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Black Kite: User already warned about those edits [1] Meters (talk) 22:08, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Neither of your pings will work, Meters. You need a new line and a full sig, like this: @Black Kite: Bishonen | talk 22:18, 25 January 2020 (UTC).[reply]

Ah, I missed that. Still, no harm in making the point again. Black Kite (talk) 13:09, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple accounts

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:32, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What on earth made you think it was acceptable to create a new account while under sanctions and scrutiny with this one? -- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:32, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User talk:2A00:23C5:D90B:9F00:9D50:3D13:3A38:828E

Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as User talk:2A00:23C5:D90B:9F00:9D50:3D13:3A38:828E, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:13, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Continued socking

As you continue to sock, I've switched your block to indefinite. You are not permitted to edit Wikipedia under any account or IP while the block on this account remains in place. Any edits you make while evading your block are may be subject to rollback per WP:BANREVERT.

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 16:45, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS 29092

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

TarzanBoy24 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #29092 was submitted on 2020-02-21 23:48:17. This review is now closed.

Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:01, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS 29146

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

TarzanBoy24 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #29146 was submitted on 2020-02-25 08:38:32. This review is now closed.

Favonian (talk) 16:50, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS 29530

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

TarzanBoy24 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #29530 was submitted on 2020-03-18 23:16:40. This review is now closed.

 --Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 03:29, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]